Blood pressure control and response rates with zofenopril compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients.

Csaba Farsang
{"title":"Blood pressure control and response rates with zofenopril compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients.","authors":"Csaba Farsang","doi":"10.1080/08038020701561737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium antagonists are today extensively used as first-line monotherapy as well as appropriate combination therapy in mild to moderate hypertension. In a parallel-group study, using clinically recommended doses, the ACEI zofenopril was compared with the calcium antagonist amlodipine in respect of their antihypertensive properties. In the study, 303 hypertensive patients, aged 18-75 years, were compared in terms of antihypertensive response and adverse effects after treatment with zofenopril, 30-60 mg once daily or amlodipine 5-10 mg od. After receiving the lower starting dose, up-titration was optional at 4 weeks to the higher dose if diastolic pressure (DBP) was 90 mmHg or more or if a decrease from base line of < 10 mmHg was present. After 4 weeks and appropriate up-titration of dose in non-responder patients, there were significant and similar reductions of sitting DBP by -10.0 and -9.9 mmHg and systolic blood pressure (SBP) by -13.0 and -13.2 mmHg the in the zofenopril and amlodipine groups, respectively. After 12 weeks of therapy, there were further reductions in blood pressure (BP) by the respective therapies. Thus, the higher zofenopril dose lowered SBP/DBP by 15.7/12.0 mmHg and the higher amlodipine dose by 17.1/ 12.2 mmHg (ns). Also, at the end of the study, the percentage of patients controlled (with sitting DBP < 90 mmHg) was 61.4% in the amlodipine and 62.2% in the zofenopril group and the percentage controlled (with sitting DBP < 90 mmHg and/or a decrease of at least 10 mmHg) was 76.4 in the amlodipine and 70.1 in the zofenopril groups (both ns). We conclude that SBP as well as DBP were substantially reduced in mild to moderate hypertensive patients over 12 weeks treatment with zofenopril or amlodipine in monotherapy. Thus, given the size of the BP reduction, such treatments are likely to produce beneficial cardiovascular outcome effects in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"2 ","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08038020701561737","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038020701561737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium antagonists are today extensively used as first-line monotherapy as well as appropriate combination therapy in mild to moderate hypertension. In a parallel-group study, using clinically recommended doses, the ACEI zofenopril was compared with the calcium antagonist amlodipine in respect of their antihypertensive properties. In the study, 303 hypertensive patients, aged 18-75 years, were compared in terms of antihypertensive response and adverse effects after treatment with zofenopril, 30-60 mg once daily or amlodipine 5-10 mg od. After receiving the lower starting dose, up-titration was optional at 4 weeks to the higher dose if diastolic pressure (DBP) was 90 mmHg or more or if a decrease from base line of < 10 mmHg was present. After 4 weeks and appropriate up-titration of dose in non-responder patients, there were significant and similar reductions of sitting DBP by -10.0 and -9.9 mmHg and systolic blood pressure (SBP) by -13.0 and -13.2 mmHg the in the zofenopril and amlodipine groups, respectively. After 12 weeks of therapy, there were further reductions in blood pressure (BP) by the respective therapies. Thus, the higher zofenopril dose lowered SBP/DBP by 15.7/12.0 mmHg and the higher amlodipine dose by 17.1/ 12.2 mmHg (ns). Also, at the end of the study, the percentage of patients controlled (with sitting DBP < 90 mmHg) was 61.4% in the amlodipine and 62.2% in the zofenopril group and the percentage controlled (with sitting DBP < 90 mmHg and/or a decrease of at least 10 mmHg) was 76.4 in the amlodipine and 70.1 in the zofenopril groups (both ns). We conclude that SBP as well as DBP were substantially reduced in mild to moderate hypertensive patients over 12 weeks treatment with zofenopril or amlodipine in monotherapy. Thus, given the size of the BP reduction, such treatments are likely to produce beneficial cardiovascular outcome effects in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唑非普利与氨氯地平对高血压患者血压控制及有效率的比较。
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和钙拮抗剂目前广泛用于轻中度高血压的一线单药治疗以及适当的联合治疗。在一项平行组研究中,使用临床推荐剂量,比较ACEI zofenopril与钙拮抗剂氨氯地平的降压特性。在这项研究中,303名年龄在18-75岁的高血压患者,比较了服用唑非普利、30-60 mg每日一次或氨氯地平5-10 mg每日一次治疗后的降压反应和不良反应。在接受较低的起始剂量后,如果舒张压(DBP)为90mmhg或更高,或者从基线下降< 10mmhg,则可以选择在4周时增加剂量至更高剂量。4周后,对无反应患者适当增加剂量,唑非普利组和氨氯地平组坐位舒张压分别显著降低-10.0和-9.9 mmHg,收缩压(SBP)分别降低-13.0和-13.2 mmHg。治疗12周后,两种治疗方法进一步降低了血压(BP)。因此,高剂量唑非普利降低收缩压/舒张压15.7/12.0 mmHg,高剂量氨氯地平降低17.1/ 12.2 mmHg (ns)。此外,在研究结束时,氨氯地平组和唑非诺普利组控制(坐位舒张压< 90mmhg)的比例分别为61.4%和62.2%,氨氯地平组和唑非诺普利组控制(坐位舒张压< 90mmhg和/或至少降低10mmhg)的比例分别为76.4和70.1(两组均为ns)。我们得出结论,在轻度至中度高血压患者中,单药唑非诺普利或氨氯地平治疗12周后,收缩压和舒张压显著降低。因此,考虑到血压降低的幅度,此类治疗可能对轻度至中度高血压患者产生有益的心血管结局效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-registration studies for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs. Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study. Efficacy and safety of early versus late titration of fixed-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide: ACTUAL study. Clevidipine for severe hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: a VELOCITY trial analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1