Objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning in functional motor symptoms and functional seizures: preliminary findings.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1080/13803395.2023.2245110
Susannah Pick, L S Merritt Millman, Yiqing Sun, Eleanor Short, Biba Stanton, Joel S Winston, Mitul A Mehta, Timothy R Nicholson, Antje A T S Reinders, Anthony S David, Mark J Edwards, Laura H Goldstein, Matthew Hotopf, Trudie Chalder
{"title":"Objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning in functional motor symptoms and functional seizures: preliminary findings.","authors":"Susannah Pick, L S Merritt Millman, Yiqing Sun, Eleanor Short, Biba Stanton, Joel S Winston, Mitul A Mehta, Timothy R Nicholson, Antje A T S Reinders, Anthony S David, Mark J Edwards, Laura H Goldstein, Matthew Hotopf, Trudie Chalder","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2023.2245110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to provide a preliminary assessment of objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning in individuals with functional motor symptoms (FMS) and/or functional seizures (FS). We tested the hypotheses that the FMS/FS group would display poorer objective attentional and executive functioning, altered social cognition, and reduced metacognitive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals with FMS/FS (n = 16) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 17) completed an abbreviated CANTAB battery, and measures of intellectual functioning, subjective cognitive complaints, performance validity, and comorbid symptoms. Subjective performance ratings were obtained to assess local metacognitive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The groups were comparable in age (p = 0.45), sex (p = 0.62), IQ (p = 0.57), and performance validity (p-values = 0.10-0.91). We observed no impairment on any CANTAB test in this FMS/FS sample compared to HCs, although the FMS/FS group displayed shorter reaction times on the Emotional Bias task (anger) (p = 0.01, np2 = 0.20). The groups did not differ in subjective performance ratings (p-values 0.15). Whilst CANTAB attentional set-shifting performance (total trials/errors) correlated with subjective performance ratings in HCs (p-values<0.005, r<sub>s</sub> = -0.85), these correlations were non-significant in the FMS/FS sample (p-values = 0.10-0.13, r<sub>s</sub>-values = -0.46-0.50). The FMS/FS group reported more daily cognitive complaints than HCs (p = 0.006, g = 0.92), which were associated with subjective performance ratings on CANTAB sustained attention (p = 0.001, r<sub>s</sub> = -0.74) and working memory tests (p < 0.001, r<sub>s</sub> = -0.75), and with depression (p = 0.003, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.70), and somatoform (p = 0.003, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.70) and psychological dissociation (p-values<0.005, r<sub>s</sub>-values = 0.67-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest a discordance between objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning in this FMS/FS sample, reflecting intact test performance alongside poorer subjective cognitive functioning. Further investigation of neurocognitive functioning in FND subgroups is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2023.2245110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to provide a preliminary assessment of objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning in individuals with functional motor symptoms (FMS) and/or functional seizures (FS). We tested the hypotheses that the FMS/FS group would display poorer objective attentional and executive functioning, altered social cognition, and reduced metacognitive accuracy.

Method: Individuals with FMS/FS (n = 16) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 17) completed an abbreviated CANTAB battery, and measures of intellectual functioning, subjective cognitive complaints, performance validity, and comorbid symptoms. Subjective performance ratings were obtained to assess local metacognitive accuracy.

Results: The groups were comparable in age (p = 0.45), sex (p = 0.62), IQ (p = 0.57), and performance validity (p-values = 0.10-0.91). We observed no impairment on any CANTAB test in this FMS/FS sample compared to HCs, although the FMS/FS group displayed shorter reaction times on the Emotional Bias task (anger) (p = 0.01, np2 = 0.20). The groups did not differ in subjective performance ratings (p-values 0.15). Whilst CANTAB attentional set-shifting performance (total trials/errors) correlated with subjective performance ratings in HCs (p-values<0.005, rs = -0.85), these correlations were non-significant in the FMS/FS sample (p-values = 0.10-0.13, rs-values = -0.46-0.50). The FMS/FS group reported more daily cognitive complaints than HCs (p = 0.006, g = 0.92), which were associated with subjective performance ratings on CANTAB sustained attention (p = 0.001, rs = -0.74) and working memory tests (p < 0.001, rs = -0.75), and with depression (p = 0.003, rs = 0.70), and somatoform (p = 0.003, rs = 0.70) and psychological dissociation (p-values<0.005, rs-values = 0.67-0.85).

Conclusions: These results suggest a discordance between objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning in this FMS/FS sample, reflecting intact test performance alongside poorer subjective cognitive functioning. Further investigation of neurocognitive functioning in FND subgroups is necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能性运动症状和功能性癫痫的客观和主观神经认知功能:初步发现。
引言:本研究旨在对患有功能性运动症状(FMS)和/或功能性癫痫(FS)的个体的客观和主观神经认知功能进行初步评估。我们测试了FMS/FS组的客观注意和执行功能较差、社会认知改变和元认知准确性降低的假设。方法:患有FMS/FS的个体(n=16)和健康对照组(HC,n=17)完成了一个简短的CANTAB组,并测量了智力功能、主观认知抱怨、表现有效性和共病症状。获得主观表现评分以评估局部元认知准确性。结果:两组在年龄(p=0.45)、性别(p=0.62)、智商(p=0.57)和成绩有效性(p值=0.10-0.91)方面具有可比性。与HCs相比,我们在该FMS/FS样本中的任何CANTAB测试均未观察到损伤,尽管FMS/FS组在情绪偏差任务(愤怒)上表现出较短的反应时间(p=0.01,np2=0.20)。两组在主观表现评级上没有差异(p值0.15)。而CANTAB注意力转移表现(总尝试/错误)与HC的主观表现评级相关(p值ss=-0.85),这些相关性在FMS/FS样本中不显著(p值=0.10-0.13,rs值=-0.46-0.50)。FMS/FS组报告的日常认知投诉比HC组多(p=0.006,g=0.92),这与CANTAB持续注意力(p=0.001,rs=-0.74)和工作记忆测试(p s=-0.75)的主观表现评分有关,抑郁症(p=0.003,rs=0.70)、躯体形态(p=0.003、rs=0.07)和心理分离(p值-值=0.67-0.85)。结论:这些结果表明,在该FMS/FS样本中,客观和主观神经认知功能不一致,反映了完整的测试表现和较差的主观认知功能。有必要进一步研究FND亚组的神经认知功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Psychological correlates of the good old days bias in mild traumatic brain injury. A tale of two constructs: confirmatory factor analysis of performance and symptom validity tests. Toward a cross-cultural understanding of intraindividual variability metrics. Prospective memory is associated with aspects of disability and quality of life in people with epilepsy. Patterns of prospective memory errors differ in persons with multiple sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1