Water Table Depth Estimates over the Contiguous United States Using a Random Forest Model

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Groundwater Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1111/gwat.13362
Yueling Ma, Elena Leonarduzzi, Amy Defnet, Peter Melchior, Laura E. Condon, Reed M. Maxwell
{"title":"Water Table Depth Estimates over the Contiguous United States Using a Random Forest Model","authors":"Yueling Ma,&nbsp;Elena Leonarduzzi,&nbsp;Amy Defnet,&nbsp;Peter Melchior,&nbsp;Laura E. Condon,&nbsp;Reed M. Maxwell","doi":"10.1111/gwat.13362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Water table depth (WTD) has a substantial impact on the connection between groundwater dynamics and land surface processes. Due to the scarcity of WTD observations, physically-based groundwater models are growing in their ability to map WTD at large scales; however, they are still challenged to represent simulated WTD compared to well observations. In this study, we develop a purely data-driven approach to estimating WTD at continental scale. We apply a random forest (RF) model to estimate WTD over most of the contiguous United States (CONUS) based on available WTD observations. The estimated WTD are in good agreement with well observations, with a Pearson correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) of 0.96 (0.81 during testing), a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.93 (0.65 during testing), and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 6.87 m (15.31 m during testing). The location of each grid cell is rated as the most important feature in estimating WTD over most of the CONUS, which might be a surrogate for spatial information. In addition, the uncertainty of the RF model is quantified using quantile regression forests. High uncertainties are generally associated with locations having a shallow WTD. Our study demonstrates that the RF model can produce reasonable WTD estimates over most of the CONUS, providing an alternative to physics-based modeling for modeling large-scale freshwater resources. Since the CONUS covers many different hydrologic regimes, the RF model trained for the CONUS may be transferrable to other regions with a similar hydrologic regime and limited observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"62 1","pages":"34-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13362","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water table depth (WTD) has a substantial impact on the connection between groundwater dynamics and land surface processes. Due to the scarcity of WTD observations, physically-based groundwater models are growing in their ability to map WTD at large scales; however, they are still challenged to represent simulated WTD compared to well observations. In this study, we develop a purely data-driven approach to estimating WTD at continental scale. We apply a random forest (RF) model to estimate WTD over most of the contiguous United States (CONUS) based on available WTD observations. The estimated WTD are in good agreement with well observations, with a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.96 (0.81 during testing), a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.93 (0.65 during testing), and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 6.87 m (15.31 m during testing). The location of each grid cell is rated as the most important feature in estimating WTD over most of the CONUS, which might be a surrogate for spatial information. In addition, the uncertainty of the RF model is quantified using quantile regression forests. High uncertainties are generally associated with locations having a shallow WTD. Our study demonstrates that the RF model can produce reasonable WTD estimates over most of the CONUS, providing an alternative to physics-based modeling for modeling large-scale freshwater resources. Since the CONUS covers many different hydrologic regimes, the RF model trained for the CONUS may be transferrable to other regions with a similar hydrologic regime and limited observations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用随机森林模型估计美国毗连地区的地下水位深度。
地下水位深度(WTD)对地下水动力学和地表过程之间的联系具有重要影响。由于WTD观测的稀缺性,基于物理的地下水模型在大尺度绘制WTD地图的能力正在增强,然而,与井观测相比,它们在表示模拟WTD方面仍然面临挑战。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种纯数据驱动的方法来估计大陆范围内的WTD。基于可用的WTD观测,我们应用随机森林(RF)模型来估计大部分连续US(CONUS)上的WTD。估计的WTD与油井观测结果非常一致,Pearson相关系数(r)为0.96(测试期间为0.81),Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)为0.93(测试期间0.65),均方根误差(RMSE)为6.87 m(测试期间15.31 m)。在大多数CONUS上,每个网格单元的位置被评为估计WTD的最重要特征,这可能是空间信息的替代。此外,使用分位数回归森林对RF模型的不确定性进行量化。高不确定性通常与具有浅WTD的位置相关。我们的研究表明,RF模型可以在大部分CONUS上产生合理的WTD估计,为大规模淡水资源建模提供了一种基于物理的建模替代方案。由于CONUS涵盖了许多不同的水文状况,因此为CONUS训练的RF模型可以转移到具有类似水文状况和有限观测的其他地区。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Groundwater
Groundwater 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Jupyter Notebooks for Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Analysis, and Optimization with PEST++ Remembering the Big Picture Exploring Freshwater Beneath the Ocean Floor Society News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1