Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Management of Pulmonary Oligometastases in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Perspective

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clcc.2023.09.001
Michael X. Fu , Catarina Carvalho , Bella Milan-Chhatrisha , Nishita Gadi
{"title":"Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Management of Pulmonary Oligometastases in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Perspective","authors":"Michael X. Fu ,&nbsp;Catarina Carvalho ,&nbsp;Bella Milan-Chhatrisha ,&nbsp;Nishita Gadi","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer (POM-CRC), metastasectomy<span><span> is the primarily recommended treatment. </span>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as a viable alternative therapy. SBRT efficacy for POM-CRC is poorly delineated compared to selected non-CRC primaries. This perspective article aims to critically summarize the existing evidence regarding efficacy of SBRT in terms of overall survival (OS) and local control (LC), and factors modulating this, in the treatment of POM-CRC. Overall, reasonable LC and OS rates were observed. The wide range of expansions in planning target volume margins introduced variation in pretreatment protocols. Dose-fractionation schedules varied according to patient and tumor characteristics, though leverage of BED</span></span><sub>10</sub><span><span> in select studies enabled standardization. An association between SBRT dose and improved OS and LC was observed across multiple studies. Prognostic factors that were associated with improved LC included: fewer oligometastases, absence of extra-pulmonary metastases, primary </span>tumor histology<span>, and smaller gross tumor volume. Differences in SBRT modality and techniques over time further confounded results. Many studies included patients receiving additional systemic therapies; preprotocol and adjuvant chemotherapies were identified as prognostic factors for LC. SBRT compared with metastasectomy showed no differences in short-term OS and LC outcomes. In conclusion, SBRT is an efficacious treatment for POM-CRC, in terms of OS and LC. Heterogeneity in study design, particularly pertaining to dose protocols, patient selection, and additional therapies should be controlled for future randomized studies to further validate SBRT efficacy.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer (POM-CRC), metastasectomy is the primarily recommended treatment. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as a viable alternative therapy. SBRT efficacy for POM-CRC is poorly delineated compared to selected non-CRC primaries. This perspective article aims to critically summarize the existing evidence regarding efficacy of SBRT in terms of overall survival (OS) and local control (LC), and factors modulating this, in the treatment of POM-CRC. Overall, reasonable LC and OS rates were observed. The wide range of expansions in planning target volume margins introduced variation in pretreatment protocols. Dose-fractionation schedules varied according to patient and tumor characteristics, though leverage of BED10 in select studies enabled standardization. An association between SBRT dose and improved OS and LC was observed across multiple studies. Prognostic factors that were associated with improved LC included: fewer oligometastases, absence of extra-pulmonary metastases, primary tumor histology, and smaller gross tumor volume. Differences in SBRT modality and techniques over time further confounded results. Many studies included patients receiving additional systemic therapies; preprotocol and adjuvant chemotherapies were identified as prognostic factors for LC. SBRT compared with metastasectomy showed no differences in short-term OS and LC outcomes. In conclusion, SBRT is an efficacious treatment for POM-CRC, in terms of OS and LC. Heterogeneity in study design, particularly pertaining to dose protocols, patient selection, and additional therapies should be controlled for future randomized studies to further validate SBRT efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向体放射治疗癌症IV期肺少转移的前景。
在癌症肺少转移(POM-CRC)中,主要推荐的治疗方法是切除转移灶。立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)已被认为是一种可行的替代疗法。与选定的非CRC原发性相比,SBRT对POM-CRC的疗效描述不佳。这篇前瞻性文章旨在批判性地总结SBRT在POM-CRC治疗中的总生存期(OS)和局部控制(LC)疗效的现有证据,以及调节这一疗效的因素。总体而言,观察到合理的LC和OS发生率。规划目标体积裕度的广泛扩展引入了预处理方案的变化。剂量分级方案根据患者和肿瘤特征而变化,尽管BED10在选定研究中的作用使标准化成为可能。在多项研究中观察到SBRT剂量与OS和LC改善之间的相关性。与LC改善相关的预后因素包括:少转移、无肺外转移、原发性肿瘤组织学和较小的总肿瘤体积。随着时间的推移,SBRT模式和技术的差异进一步混淆了结果。许多研究包括接受额外全身治疗的患者;经鉴定,前胶原和辅助化疗是LC的预后因素。SBRT与转移切除术相比,短期OS和LC结果没有差异。总之,就OS和LC而言,SBRT是POM-CRC的有效治疗方法。在未来的随机研究中,应控制研究设计的异质性,特别是与剂量方案、患者选择和额外治疗有关的异质性以进一步验证SBRT的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1