Impact of stroke on people that receive rehabilitation and are living in Ankara, Turkey.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2023-10-08 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036231204321
Orkun Tahir Aran, Barkın Köse, Gunilla Erikson, Susanne Guidetti
{"title":"Impact of stroke on people that receive rehabilitation and are living in Ankara, Turkey.","authors":"Orkun Tahir Aran,&nbsp;Barkın Köse,&nbsp;Gunilla Erikson,&nbsp;Susanne Guidetti","doi":"10.1177/22799036231204321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and practices vary between high and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Knowledge of the perceived impact of stroke in Turkey is limited. Understanding these perceptions can serve as a basis for developing rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>The aim was to investigate and compare the perceived impact of stroke in two groups of people living in Ankara. A cross-sectional study with 150 participants divided by stroke onset (Group I: stroke onset <12 months; Group II: >12 months) was conducted. The Barthel Index was used to describe the level of independence in daily living activities and stroke severity. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0) was used to investigate the perceived impact of stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of mild strokes was 78 and 82%, respectively, and 46% of participants in the total sample were moderately dependent. The impact of stroke was high; mean domain scores were below 50 in six of the eight SIS domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Turkish stroke survivors perceived a higher impact of stroke regardless of the time passed since stroke onset, compared to survivors from other countries, including other LMICs. The high impact among survivors with mostly mild stroke indicates that Turkish survivors might not receive adequate rehabilitation. The content of rehabilitation services needs to be developed, and an evaluation of individually tailored interventions, preferably with a multidisciplinary approach, is warranted to find ways to decrease the perceived impact of stroke among Turkish stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"12 4","pages":"22799036231204321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231204321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and practices vary between high and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Knowledge of the perceived impact of stroke in Turkey is limited. Understanding these perceptions can serve as a basis for developing rehabilitation.

Design and methods: The aim was to investigate and compare the perceived impact of stroke in two groups of people living in Ankara. A cross-sectional study with 150 participants divided by stroke onset (Group I: stroke onset <12 months; Group II: >12 months) was conducted. The Barthel Index was used to describe the level of independence in daily living activities and stroke severity. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0) was used to investigate the perceived impact of stroke.

Results: The proportion of mild strokes was 78 and 82%, respectively, and 46% of participants in the total sample were moderately dependent. The impact of stroke was high; mean domain scores were below 50 in six of the eight SIS domains.

Conclusions: Turkish stroke survivors perceived a higher impact of stroke regardless of the time passed since stroke onset, compared to survivors from other countries, including other LMICs. The high impact among survivors with mostly mild stroke indicates that Turkish survivors might not receive adequate rehabilitation. The content of rehabilitation services needs to be developed, and an evaluation of individually tailored interventions, preferably with a multidisciplinary approach, is warranted to find ways to decrease the perceived impact of stroke among Turkish stroke survivors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风对土耳其安卡拉接受康复治疗和生活的人的影响。
背景:中风康复和实践的临床指南在高收入和低收入国家之间有所不同。土耳其对中风影响的认知有限。了解这些认知可以作为发展康复的基础。设计和方法:目的是调查和比较安卡拉两组人对中风的感知影响。一项横断面研究,150名参与者按中风发作情况进行划分(第一组:中风发作12 月)。Barthel指数用于描述日常生活活动的独立性水平和中风的严重程度。中风影响量表(SIS 3.0)用于研究中风的感知影响。结果:轻度中风的比例分别为78%和82%,总样本中46%的参与者具有中度依赖性。中风的影响很大;八个SIS域中有六个域的平均域得分低于50。结论:与包括其他LMIC在内的其他国家的幸存者相比,无论中风发生后的时间如何,土耳其中风幸存者都感受到了更高的中风影响。大多数轻度中风幸存者的高影响表明,土耳其幸存者可能无法得到充分的康复。康复服务的内容需要制定,有必要对个性化干预措施进行评估,最好采用多学科方法,以找到减少土耳其中风幸存者对中风影响的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
期刊最新文献
Factors on medical clerkship students' quality of life: A survey study. Magseed preoperative localization in non-palpable breast lesions: Our single-center Breast Unit experience. Analyzing diversity trends in dermatology: A comprehensive overview. Reproducibility and explainability in digital pathology: The need to make black-box artificial intelligence systems more transparent. Healthcare students are faced with the issue of the rights of people with disabilities and the quality of services: Are we training future healthcare workers who overemphasize technology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1