The Therapeutic Efficacy of Freeze-Dried Human Amniotic Membrane Allograft Gel for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Phase-1 Clinical Trial.

Aida Rezaei-Nejad, Mohammad-Amir Amirkhani, Alireza Ebrahimi, Seyyed-Mojtaba Ghorani, Emad Alamoutifard, Mohammad-Ali Nilforoushzadeh, Mahsa Mollapour-Sisakht
{"title":"The Therapeutic Efficacy of Freeze-Dried Human Amniotic Membrane Allograft Gel for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Phase-1 Clinical Trial.","authors":"Aida Rezaei-Nejad,&nbsp;Mohammad-Amir Amirkhani,&nbsp;Alireza Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Seyyed-Mojtaba Ghorani,&nbsp;Emad Alamoutifard,&nbsp;Mohammad-Ali Nilforoushzadeh,&nbsp;Mahsa Mollapour-Sisakht","doi":"10.1177/15347346231204246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are classified as hard-to-heal wounds, which occur in approximately 15% of diabetic patients. Several interventions have shown efficacy in reducing the risk of amputation among patients with DFU, including timely diagnosis and management of infection and ischemia, debridement of necrotic tissues, reducing mechanical pressure on ulcers, and patient education. One major challenge in the management of DFUs is optimizing wound care to improve healing outcomes. Recently, interdisciplinary approaches proposed a new generation of wound dressing which increased efficacy and significantly decreased the healing time. The current study assessed the healing characteristics of chronic DFUs treated with lyophilized amniotic membrane gel (LAMG) in combination with standard care, versus a placebo hydrogel with standard care. In total, 18 patients (8 male, 10 female) were randomly assigned to the control group, which received standard care and a gelatin scaffold (placebo), or the intervention group, which received standard care along with LAMG. We evaluated the reduction in wound size and assessed the patient's health-related quality of life over 9 weeks. In the LAMG group (n = 9) and the Placebo group (n = 9), the wounds were reduced in size by a mean of 73.4% ± 15.3% and 13.1% ± 10.1%, respectively (<i>P</i> = .008). Patients treated with LAMG demonstrated significant improvements in the scores related to physical function, physical limitation, physical pain, general health, social function, emotional problems, and energy levels compared to the control group. The findings of this study indicate that using the LAMG with standard care significantly enhances wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231204246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are classified as hard-to-heal wounds, which occur in approximately 15% of diabetic patients. Several interventions have shown efficacy in reducing the risk of amputation among patients with DFU, including timely diagnosis and management of infection and ischemia, debridement of necrotic tissues, reducing mechanical pressure on ulcers, and patient education. One major challenge in the management of DFUs is optimizing wound care to improve healing outcomes. Recently, interdisciplinary approaches proposed a new generation of wound dressing which increased efficacy and significantly decreased the healing time. The current study assessed the healing characteristics of chronic DFUs treated with lyophilized amniotic membrane gel (LAMG) in combination with standard care, versus a placebo hydrogel with standard care. In total, 18 patients (8 male, 10 female) were randomly assigned to the control group, which received standard care and a gelatin scaffold (placebo), or the intervention group, which received standard care along with LAMG. We evaluated the reduction in wound size and assessed the patient's health-related quality of life over 9 weeks. In the LAMG group (n = 9) and the Placebo group (n = 9), the wounds were reduced in size by a mean of 73.4% ± 15.3% and 13.1% ± 10.1%, respectively (P = .008). Patients treated with LAMG demonstrated significant improvements in the scores related to physical function, physical limitation, physical pain, general health, social function, emotional problems, and energy levels compared to the control group. The findings of this study indicate that using the LAMG with standard care significantly enhances wound healing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冻干人羊膜移植物凝胶治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:一期临床试验。
糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)被归类为难以愈合的伤口,约15%的糖尿病患者会出现这种情况。一些干预措施已显示出在降低DFU患者截肢风险方面的有效性,包括及时诊断和管理感染和缺血、坏死组织清创、减轻溃疡的机械压力以及患者教育。DFU管理中的一个主要挑战是优化伤口护理以提高愈合效果。最近,跨学科的方法提出了新一代伤口敷料,它提高了疗效并显著缩短了愈合时间。目前的研究评估了冻干羊膜凝胶(LAMG)与标准护理相结合治疗慢性DFU与安慰剂水凝胶与标准护理的愈合特性。总共有18名患者(8名男性,10名女性)被随机分配到对照组和干预组,对照组接受标准护理和明胶支架(安慰剂),干预组接受标准治疗和LAMG。我们评估了伤口大小的减少,并评估了患者在9周内与健康相关的生活质量。在LAMG组中(n = 9) 安慰剂组(n = 9) ,伤口的大小平均减少了73.4% ± 15.3%和13.1% ± 10.1%(P = .008)。与对照组相比,接受LAMG治疗的患者在与身体功能、身体限制、身体疼痛、总体健康、社会功能、情绪问题和能量水平相关的评分方面表现出显著改善。这项研究的结果表明,在标准护理下使用LAMG可显著提高伤口愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. Analysis of Genetic Risk Factors Associated with Charcot Foot Based on the FinnGen Study R9 Data: A Wide-angle Mendelian Randomization Study. Manifestations of Endocrine Disease in the Lower Extremities: Beyond the Diabetic Foot. Evolving Strategies in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Early Tissue Resection Versus Watchful Waiting After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1