Comparison of sleep quality between clear aligner and fixed appliance orthodontic therapies

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.09.002
Zaki Hakami
{"title":"Comparison of sleep quality between clear aligner and fixed appliance orthodontic therapies","authors":"Zaki Hakami","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although available evidence suggests that orthodontic appliances can impact quality of life, there is limited information on the impact of orthodontic appliances on sleep quality. This study aimed to compare sleep quality between patients undergoing orthodontic treatments using conventional fixed appliances and clear aligners.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adult patients attending clinics in Saudi Arabia participated in this cross-sectional study. Sleep quality was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Statistical significance was determined using inferential analysis, with a <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 69 patients included in the study. The average age of a patient (33.12 ± 8.1) who received the clear aligner was significantly higher than those who received the fixed appliance (27.7 ± 5.9) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The variation in the average score of ESS because of the education level was found to be statistically significant (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the mean average ESS and PSQI global scores across the two orthodontic treatment groups. The average sleep latency scores were significantly higher in females than males when analyzing the PSQI component score across sex (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In education, ESS, PSQI global, habitual sleep efficiency, the use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction had a positive, weak, but significant correlation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, this study concluded that regardless of the orthodontic appliances used, there was no statistically significant difference in sleep quality during the treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212443823000954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although available evidence suggests that orthodontic appliances can impact quality of life, there is limited information on the impact of orthodontic appliances on sleep quality. This study aimed to compare sleep quality between patients undergoing orthodontic treatments using conventional fixed appliances and clear aligners.

Methods

Adult patients attending clinics in Saudi Arabia participated in this cross-sectional study. Sleep quality was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Statistical significance was determined using inferential analysis, with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

There were 69 patients included in the study. The average age of a patient (33.12 ± 8.1) who received the clear aligner was significantly higher than those who received the fixed appliance (27.7 ± 5.9) (P < 0.05). The variation in the average score of ESS because of the education level was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the mean average ESS and PSQI global scores across the two orthodontic treatment groups. The average sleep latency scores were significantly higher in females than males when analyzing the PSQI component score across sex (P < 0.05). In education, ESS, PSQI global, habitual sleep efficiency, the use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction had a positive, weak, but significant correlation.

Conclusions

Overall, this study concluded that regardless of the orthodontic appliances used, there was no statistically significant difference in sleep quality during the treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明矫正器和固定矫治器正畸治疗的睡眠质量比较。
背景:尽管现有证据表明正畸矫治器会影响生活质量,但关于正畸矫治具对睡眠质量的影响的信息有限。本研究旨在比较使用传统固定矫治器和透明矫正器进行正畸治疗的患者的睡眠质量。方法:在沙特阿拉伯诊所就诊的成年患者参与了这项横断面研究。使用经验证的阿拉伯语版匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和埃普沃斯睡眠量表(ESS)评估睡眠质量。采用推断分析确定统计学显著性,P<0.05被认为具有统计学显著性。结果:本研究共纳入69例患者。接受透明矫正器的患者的平均年龄(33.12±8.1)显著高于接受固定矫治器的患者(27.7±5.9)(P<0.05)。ESS的平均得分因教育水平的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)两个正畸治疗组。在分析不同性别的PSQI成分得分时,女性的平均睡眠潜伏期得分显著高于男性(P<0.05)。在教育方面,ESS、PSQI全局、习惯性睡眠效率、睡眠药物的使用和日间功能障碍具有正、弱但显著的相关性。结论:总体而言,本研究得出的结论是,无论使用何种正畸矫治器,治疗期间的睡眠质量都没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Nonsurgical treatment of an adult patient with severe transversal skeletal discrepancy: Tooth bone-borne tandem expander and hybrid aligner approach Comparison of the accuracy of bracket axial positioning with and without radiographic support and according to practitioner experience: A three-dimensional study Evaluation of incipient enamel-carious-like lesion treated with hydroxyapatite-chitosan nanocomposite hydrogel. Evaluation of incipient enamel-carious–like lesion treated with hydroxyapatite-chitosan nanocomposite hydrogel Validity of digital analysis versus manual analysis on orthodontic casts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1