Wearable motion-based platform for functional spine health assessment.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2023-104840
Prasath Mageswaran, Jonathan Dufour, Alexander Aurand, Gregory Knapik, Hamed Hani, Dukagjin M Blakaj, Safdar Khan, Nasir Hussain, Maneesh Tiwari, Jayesh Vallabh, Tristan Weaver, William S Marras
{"title":"Wearable motion-based platform for functional spine health assessment.","authors":"Prasath Mageswaran, Jonathan Dufour, Alexander Aurand, Gregory Knapik, Hamed Hani, Dukagjin M Blakaj, Safdar Khan, Nasir Hussain, Maneesh Tiwari, Jayesh Vallabh, Tristan Weaver, William S Marras","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain is a significant burden to society and the lack of reliable outcome measures, combined with a prevailing inability to quantify the biopsychosocial elements implicated in the disease, impedes clinical decision-making and distorts treatment efficacy. This paper aims to validate the utility of a biopsychosocial spine platform to provide standardized wearable sensor-derived functional motion assessments to assess spine function and differentiate between healthy controls and patients. Secondarily, we explored the correlation between these motion features and subjective biopsychosocial measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted on healthy controls (n=50) and patients with low back pain (n=50) to validate platform utility. The platform was used to conduct functional assessments along with patient-reported outcome assessments to holistically document cohort differences. Our primary outcomes were motion features; and our secondary outcomes were biopsychosocial measures (pain, function, etc).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results demonstrated statistically significant differences in motion features between healthy and patient cohorts across anatomical planes. Importantly, we found velocity and acceleration in the axial plane showed the largest difference, with healthy controls having 49.7% and 55.7% higher values, respectively, than patients. In addition, we found significant correlations between motion features and biopsychosocial measures for pain, physical function and social role only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study validated the use of wearable sensor-derived functional motion metrics in differentiating healthy controls and patients. Collectively, this technology has the potential to facilitate holistic biopsychosocial evaluations to enhance spine care and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05776771.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104840","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low back pain is a significant burden to society and the lack of reliable outcome measures, combined with a prevailing inability to quantify the biopsychosocial elements implicated in the disease, impedes clinical decision-making and distorts treatment efficacy. This paper aims to validate the utility of a biopsychosocial spine platform to provide standardized wearable sensor-derived functional motion assessments to assess spine function and differentiate between healthy controls and patients. Secondarily, we explored the correlation between these motion features and subjective biopsychosocial measures.

Methods: An observational study was conducted on healthy controls (n=50) and patients with low back pain (n=50) to validate platform utility. The platform was used to conduct functional assessments along with patient-reported outcome assessments to holistically document cohort differences. Our primary outcomes were motion features; and our secondary outcomes were biopsychosocial measures (pain, function, etc).

Results: Our results demonstrated statistically significant differences in motion features between healthy and patient cohorts across anatomical planes. Importantly, we found velocity and acceleration in the axial plane showed the largest difference, with healthy controls having 49.7% and 55.7% higher values, respectively, than patients. In addition, we found significant correlations between motion features and biopsychosocial measures for pain, physical function and social role only.

Conclusions: Our study validated the use of wearable sensor-derived functional motion metrics in differentiating healthy controls and patients. Collectively, this technology has the potential to facilitate holistic biopsychosocial evaluations to enhance spine care and improve patient outcomes.

Trial registration number: NCT05776771.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于运动的可穿戴平台,用于功能性脊柱健康评估。
引言:腰痛是社会的一个重大负担,缺乏可靠的结果测量,再加上普遍无法量化与该疾病有关的生物心理社会因素,阻碍了临床决策,扭曲了治疗效果。本文旨在验证生物-心理-社会脊柱平台的实用性,该平台可提供标准化的可穿戴传感器衍生的功能性运动评估,以评估脊柱功能并区分健康对照组和患者。其次,我们探讨了这些运动特征与主观生物心理社会测量之间的相关性。方法:对健康对照组(n=50)和腰痛患者(n=5 0)进行观察性研究,以验证平台的实用性。该平台用于进行功能评估以及患者报告的结果评估,以全面记录队列差异。我们的主要结果是运动特征;我们的次要结果是生物心理社会测量(疼痛、功能等)。结果:我们的结果表明,在解剖平面上,健康和患者队列的运动特征存在统计学上的显著差异。重要的是,我们发现轴平面上的速度和加速度差异最大,健康对照组的值分别比患者高49.7%和55.7%。此外,我们发现运动特征与疼痛、身体功能和社会角色的生物心理社会测量之间存在显著相关性。结论:我们的研究验证了可穿戴传感器衍生的功能性运动指标在区分健康对照组和患者方面的应用。总之,这项技术有可能促进整体的生物-心理-社会评估,以加强脊柱护理并改善患者的预后。试验注册号:NCT05776771。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in spontaneously breathing patients: a low-cost strategy. Comparing modalities of opioid education in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized pilot trial. Peripheral nerve microanatomy: new insights into possible mechanisms for block success. Evolving Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine fellowship application process: a program director survey. Mortality in patients undergoing thoracotomy with continuous neuraxial analgesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1