Effects of Dextrose Supplementation on Chloral Hydrate Sedation: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Prospective Study.

Chonnam medical journal Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-25 DOI:10.4068/cmj.2023.59.3.174
Young Kwon Koh, Han Gil Kang, Young Kuk Cho
{"title":"Effects of Dextrose Supplementation on Chloral Hydrate Sedation: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Prospective Study.","authors":"Young Kwon Koh, Han Gil Kang, Young Kuk Cho","doi":"10.4068/cmj.2023.59.3.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sedation plays a crucial role in successful pediatric imaging, and chloral hydrate is commonly used for this purpose. However, the challenges associated with chloral hydrate administration, such as its unpleasant taste and potential induction of vomiting, remain a concern. Sweet oral solutions have emerged as potential solutions for reducing distress and providing analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of dextrose combined with chloral hydrate with that of conventional sedation methods. This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical study enrolled 160 pediatric outpatients scheduled for echocardiography. Chloral hydrate syrup (100 mg/mL) was supplemented with a dextrose solution (dextrose group) or distilled water (control group) in a 1:10 volume ratio. The sedation achievement time, Skeie scale score, revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score, and side effects (nausea, vomiting, hypoxia, and respiratory depression) were assessed. No significant difference in average time to achieve sedation was observed between the dextrose and control groups (24.4±17.8 vs. 24.7±17.1 min, p=0.92). Both groups demonstrated similar levels of sedation according to the Skeie scale and mean revised FLACC score. Although the occurrence rates of nausea and vomiting had no significant differences, the dextrose group had no cases of vomiting in children aged >24 months compared to the control group, which had three cases (30%). In conclusion, the addition of dextrose to chloral hydrate did not significantly affect sedation time, anxiety, pain reduction, or occurrence of gastrointestinal complications during sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94372,"journal":{"name":"Chonnam medical journal","volume":"59 3","pages":"174-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/74/cmj-59-174.PMC10570855.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chonnam medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2023.59.3.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sedation plays a crucial role in successful pediatric imaging, and chloral hydrate is commonly used for this purpose. However, the challenges associated with chloral hydrate administration, such as its unpleasant taste and potential induction of vomiting, remain a concern. Sweet oral solutions have emerged as potential solutions for reducing distress and providing analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of dextrose combined with chloral hydrate with that of conventional sedation methods. This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical study enrolled 160 pediatric outpatients scheduled for echocardiography. Chloral hydrate syrup (100 mg/mL) was supplemented with a dextrose solution (dextrose group) or distilled water (control group) in a 1:10 volume ratio. The sedation achievement time, Skeie scale score, revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score, and side effects (nausea, vomiting, hypoxia, and respiratory depression) were assessed. No significant difference in average time to achieve sedation was observed between the dextrose and control groups (24.4±17.8 vs. 24.7±17.1 min, p=0.92). Both groups demonstrated similar levels of sedation according to the Skeie scale and mean revised FLACC score. Although the occurrence rates of nausea and vomiting had no significant differences, the dextrose group had no cases of vomiting in children aged >24 months compared to the control group, which had three cases (30%). In conclusion, the addition of dextrose to chloral hydrate did not significantly affect sedation time, anxiety, pain reduction, or occurrence of gastrointestinal complications during sedation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充葡萄糖对水合氯醛镇静作用的影响:一项双盲、随机、前瞻性研究。
镇静在成功的儿科成像中起着至关重要的作用,水合氯醛通常用于此目的。然而,与水合氯醛给药相关的挑战,如其令人不快的味道和潜在的呕吐诱导,仍然令人担忧。甜味口服液已成为减少痛苦和提供镇痛的潜在解决方案。本研究比较了葡萄糖与水合氯醛联合使用与常规镇静方法的疗效。这项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照的临床研究纳入了160名计划进行超声心动图检查的儿科门诊患者。用葡萄糖溶液(葡萄糖组)或蒸馏水(对照组)以1:10的体积比补充水合氯醛糖浆(100mg/mL)。评估镇静完成时间、Skeie量表评分、修正后的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和舒适性(FLACC)评分以及副作用(恶心、呕吐、缺氧和呼吸抑制)。葡萄糖组和对照组达到镇静的平均时间没有显著差异(24.4±17.8 vs.24.7±17.1分钟,p=0.092)。根据Skeie量表和平均修正FLACC评分,两组的镇静水平相似。尽管恶心和呕吐的发生率没有显著差异,但与对照组相比,葡萄糖组在>24个月大的儿童中没有呕吐病例,对照组有3例(30%)。总之,在水合氯醛中添加葡萄糖不会显著影响镇静时间、焦虑、疼痛减轻或镇静期间胃肠道并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery. Beaver Tail Liver: A Morphological Study of Variation in the Left Lobe of the Liver. Comparison of Synergistic Sedation with Midazolam and Propofol Versus Midazolam and Pethidine in Colonoscopies: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. Corticosteroid Therapy Duration and Dosage According to the Timing of Treatment Initiation for Post-COVID-19 Organizing Pneumonia. Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Health Promotion Program for Family Caregivers of Chronic Mental Disorders: A Mixed Methods Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1