The Determinants of Tax-Based Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of State Governments

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Performance & Management Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1080/15309576.2022.2115089
Hakyeon Lee, J. S. Butler
{"title":"The Determinants of Tax-Based Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of State Governments","authors":"Hakyeon Lee, J. S. Butler","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2022.2115089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To determine why state governments often use tax-based incentives, this study focuses on five major tax-based incentives: job creation tax credits, investment tax credits, R&D credits, property tax abatements, and customized job training subsidies. The statistical results indicate that a state government’s prevailing political ideology influences the choice of economic development activities. Accordingly, a more liberal state is less likely to use property tax abatements and customized job-training subsidies, and more likely to use job creation tax credits and R&D tax credits. Further, competition does not operate to trigger tax-based incentives. State economic conditions are not significantly related to the use of incentives. This result could imply the prevalence of political factors in the use of incentives.","PeriodicalId":47571,"journal":{"name":"Public Performance & Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Performance & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2115089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract To determine why state governments often use tax-based incentives, this study focuses on five major tax-based incentives: job creation tax credits, investment tax credits, R&D credits, property tax abatements, and customized job training subsidies. The statistical results indicate that a state government’s prevailing political ideology influences the choice of economic development activities. Accordingly, a more liberal state is less likely to use property tax abatements and customized job-training subsidies, and more likely to use job creation tax credits and R&D tax credits. Further, competition does not operate to trigger tax-based incentives. State economic conditions are not significantly related to the use of incentives. This result could imply the prevalence of political factors in the use of incentives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
税收激励的决定因素:对州政府的实证分析
摘要为了确定州政府为什么经常使用基于税收的激励措施,本研究重点关注五种主要的基于税收的奖励措施:创造就业税收抵免、投资税收抵免、研发抵免、财产税减免和定制的就业培训补贴。统计结果表明,一个州政府的主流政治意识形态会影响经济发展活动的选择。因此,一个更自由的州不太可能使用财产税减免和定制的就业培训补贴,更有可能使用创造就业的税收抵免和研发税收抵免。此外,竞争并不能引发基于税收的激励措施。国家经济状况与激励措施的使用没有显著关系。这一结果可能意味着在使用激励措施时普遍存在政治因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
16.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Determinants of Adaptive Capacity: The Nonprofit Sector in the Turbulent COVID-19 Environment in Belarus and Ukraine Effect of Citizen Incivility on Self-Sacrifice of Public Service Motivation and Turnover Intention of Street-Level Bureaucrats: Mediating Effect of Emotional Exhaustion Where Do Citizens Place Blame for Service Delivery Failure? A Closer Look at Public-Private Partnerships Trust and Public Service Motivation The Influences of Ambidexterity, New Public Management and Innovation on the Public Service Quality of Government Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1