Performance Comparison of Computational Methods for the Prediction of the Function and Pathogenicity of Non-coding Variants.

IF 11.5 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.gpb.2022.02.002
Zheng Wang, Guihu Zhao, Bin Li, Zhenghuan Fang, Qian Chen, Xiaomeng Wang, Tengfei Luo, Yijing Wang, Qiao Zhou, Kuokuo Li, Lu Xia, Yi Zhang, Xun Zhou, Hongxu Pan, Yuwen Zhao, Yige Wang, Lin Wang, Jifeng Guo, Beisha Tang, Kun Xia, Jinchen Li
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Computational Methods for the Prediction of the Function and Pathogenicity of Non-coding Variants.","authors":"Zheng Wang, Guihu Zhao, Bin Li, Zhenghuan Fang, Qian Chen, Xiaomeng Wang, Tengfei Luo, Yijing Wang, Qiao Zhou, Kuokuo Li, Lu Xia, Yi Zhang, Xun Zhou, Hongxu Pan, Yuwen Zhao, Yige Wang, Lin Wang, Jifeng Guo, Beisha Tang, Kun Xia, Jinchen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.gpb.2022.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-coding variants in the human genome significantly influence human traits and complex diseases via their regulation and modification effects. Hence, an increasing number of computational methods are developed to predict the effects of variants in human non-coding sequences. However, it is difficult for inexperienced users to select appropriate computational methods from dozens of available methods. To solve this issue, we assessed 12 performance metrics of 24 methods on four independent non-coding variant benchmark datasets: (1) rare germline variants from clinical relevant sequence variants (ClinVar), (2) rare somatic variants from Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC), (3) common regulatory variants from curated expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) data, and (4) disease-associated common variants from curated genome-wide association studies (GWAS). All 24 tested methods performed differently under various conditions, indicating varying strengths and weaknesses under different scenarios. Importantly, the performance of existing methods was acceptable for rare germline variants from ClinVar with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.4481-0.8033 and poor for rare somatic variants from COSMIC (AUROC = 0.4984-0.7131), common regulatory variants from curated eQTL data (AUROC = 0.4837-0.6472), and disease-associated common variants from curated GWAS (AUROC = 0.4766-0.5188). We also compared the prediction performance of 24 methods for non-coding de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorder, and found that the combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD) and context-dependent tolerance score (CDTS) methods showed better performance. Summarily, we assessed the performance of 24 computational methods under diverse scenarios, providing preliminary advice for proper tool selection and guiding the development of new techniques in interpreting non-coding variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12528,"journal":{"name":"Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10787016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.02.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-coding variants in the human genome significantly influence human traits and complex diseases via their regulation and modification effects. Hence, an increasing number of computational methods are developed to predict the effects of variants in human non-coding sequences. However, it is difficult for inexperienced users to select appropriate computational methods from dozens of available methods. To solve this issue, we assessed 12 performance metrics of 24 methods on four independent non-coding variant benchmark datasets: (1) rare germline variants from clinical relevant sequence variants (ClinVar), (2) rare somatic variants from Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC), (3) common regulatory variants from curated expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) data, and (4) disease-associated common variants from curated genome-wide association studies (GWAS). All 24 tested methods performed differently under various conditions, indicating varying strengths and weaknesses under different scenarios. Importantly, the performance of existing methods was acceptable for rare germline variants from ClinVar with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.4481-0.8033 and poor for rare somatic variants from COSMIC (AUROC = 0.4984-0.7131), common regulatory variants from curated eQTL data (AUROC = 0.4837-0.6472), and disease-associated common variants from curated GWAS (AUROC = 0.4766-0.5188). We also compared the prediction performance of 24 methods for non-coding de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorder, and found that the combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD) and context-dependent tolerance score (CDTS) methods showed better performance. Summarily, we assessed the performance of 24 computational methods under diverse scenarios, providing preliminary advice for proper tool selection and guiding the development of new techniques in interpreting non-coding variants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非编码变异功能和致病性预测计算方法的性能比较。
人类基因组中的非编码变异通过其调控和修饰作用对人类性状和复杂疾病产生重大影响。因此,越来越多的计算方法被用来预测人类非编码序列中变异的影响。然而,缺乏经验的用户很难从数十种可用方法中选择合适的计算方法。为了解决这个问题,我们在四个独立的非编码变异基准数据集上评估了 24 种方法的 12 个性能指标:(1)来自临床相关序列变异(ClinVar)的罕见种系变异;(2)来自癌症中体细胞突变目录(COSMIC)的罕见体细胞变异;(3)来自编辑的表达量性状位点(eQTL)数据的常见调控变异;以及(4)来自编辑的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的疾病相关常见变异。所有 24 种测试方法在不同条件下的表现都不尽相同,这表明在不同情况下它们的优缺点也各不相同。重要的是,对于来自 ClinVar 的罕见种系变异,现有方法的性能是可以接受的,接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为 0.4481-0.8033,而对于来自 COSMIC 的罕见体细胞变异(AUROC = 0.4984-0.7131)、来自已整合 eQTL 数据的常见调控变异(AUROC = 0.4837-0.6472)和来自已整合 GWAS 的疾病相关常见变异(AUROC = 0.4766-0.5188),现有方法的性能较差。我们还比较了 24 种方法对自闭症谱系障碍中的非编码从头突变的预测性能,发现注释依赖性删除法(CADD)和上下文依赖性容许度评分法(CDTS)显示出更好的性能。总之,我们评估了 24 种计算方法在不同情况下的性能,为正确选择工具提供了初步建议,并为开发解释非编码变异的新技术提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
844
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics (GPB) is the official journal of the Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences / China National Center for Bioinformation and Genetics Society of China. It aims to disseminate new developments in the field of omics and bioinformatics, publish high-quality discoveries quickly, and promote open access and online publication. GPB welcomes submissions in all areas of life science, biology, and biomedicine, with a focus on large data acquisition, analysis, and curation. Manuscripts covering omics and related bioinformatics topics are particularly encouraged. GPB is indexed/abstracted by PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Scopus, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts, CSCD, among others.
期刊最新文献
Review and Evaluate the Bioinformatics Analysis Strategies of ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag Data. Identification of highly repetitive barley enhancers with long-range regulation potential via STARR-seq CpG island definition and methylation mapping of the T2T-YAO genome Pindel-TD: a tandem duplication detector based on a pattern growth approach SMARTdb: An Integrated Database for Exploring Single-cell Multi-omics Data of Reproductive Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1