Sludge and transaction costs

IF 5.1 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.1017/BPP.2021.12
S. Shahab, Leonhard K. Lades
{"title":"Sludge and transaction costs","authors":"S. Shahab, Leonhard K. Lades","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2021.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Behavioral scientists have begun to research ‘sludge,’ excessive frictions that make it harder for people to do what they want to do. Friction is also an important concept in transaction-cost economics. Nevertheless, sludge has been discussed without explicit referral to transaction costs. Several questions arise from this observation. Is the analogy to friction used differently in both literatures? If so, what are the key differences? If not, should we develop the concept of sludge when the well-established literature on transaction costs already exists? This conceptual article shows that sludge and transaction costs are related, but distinct, concepts, and that the literature on sludge can benefit from incorporating elements from transaction-cost research. For example, we suggest defining sludge as aspects of the choice architecture that lead to the experience of costs, organize sludges using a typology inspired by the transaction-cost literature, highlight specificity, uncertainty, and frequency as important determinants of the ‘sludginess’ of choice architecture, and show that sludge audits can be conducted using methods developed in the transaction-cost literature.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"372 5","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2021.12","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2021.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Behavioral scientists have begun to research ‘sludge,’ excessive frictions that make it harder for people to do what they want to do. Friction is also an important concept in transaction-cost economics. Nevertheless, sludge has been discussed without explicit referral to transaction costs. Several questions arise from this observation. Is the analogy to friction used differently in both literatures? If so, what are the key differences? If not, should we develop the concept of sludge when the well-established literature on transaction costs already exists? This conceptual article shows that sludge and transaction costs are related, but distinct, concepts, and that the literature on sludge can benefit from incorporating elements from transaction-cost research. For example, we suggest defining sludge as aspects of the choice architecture that lead to the experience of costs, organize sludges using a typology inspired by the transaction-cost literature, highlight specificity, uncertainty, and frequency as important determinants of the ‘sludginess’ of choice architecture, and show that sludge audits can be conducted using methods developed in the transaction-cost literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
污泥和交易成本
行为科学家已经开始研究“污泥”,即让人们更难做自己想做的事的过度摩擦。摩擦也是交易成本经济学中的一个重要概念。然而,关于污泥的讨论没有明确提及交易成本。从这一观察中产生了几个问题。在两篇文献中对摩擦的类比使用不同吗?如果有,关键的区别是什么?如果不是这样,我们是否应该在交易成本的成熟文献已经存在的情况下发展污泥的概念?这篇概念性的文章表明,污泥和交易成本是相关但不同的概念,并且关于污泥的文献可以从纳入交易成本研究的元素中受益。例如,我们建议将污泥定义为导致成本体验的选择架构的各个方面,使用受交易成本文献启发的类型化来组织污泥,强调特殊性、不确定性和频率是选择架构“污泥性”的重要决定因素,并表明可以使用交易成本文献中开发的方法进行污泥审计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of timers and precommitments on handwashing: a randomised controlled trial in a kitchen laboratory Beliefs, observability and donation revision in charitable giving: evidence from an online experiment The paradox of disclosure: shifting policies from revealing to resolving conflicts of interest Harnessing heterogeneity in behavioural research using computational social science Deception aversion, communal norm violation and consumer responses to prosocial initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1