Contractual obligations as an element of transaction costs of the exchange deal

IF 1.9 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Intelligenza Artificiale Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI:10.24891/IA.24.3.252
V. Plotnikov, S. S. Kanapinova
{"title":"Contractual obligations as an element of transaction costs of the exchange deal","authors":"V. Plotnikov, S. S. Kanapinova","doi":"10.24891/IA.24.3.252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subject. This article discusses the issues relating to the reflection of contractual obligations in the accounting system as an economic category of transaction costs.\nObjectives. The article aims to describe a market-based approach to defining contractual obligations as transaction costs of the organization and the specifics of their separate reflection in the accounting system. It also aims to define the content of the organization's obligations in terms of the rights of claim for economic resources to reduce the gap between accounting theory and institutional theory.\nMethods. For the study, we used the theory of institutional economics, the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting that help expand the scope of accounting by incorporating market relations reflecting the obligations to provide exchange transactions.\nResults. The article defines and proves the importance of the obligations of the exchange transaction parties to reflect them in the accounting system, and that transaction costs expressed by obligations determine the future rights of the market agents. The economic content of the exchange transaction parties' contractual obligations is significantly different from the accounting understanding of receivables and payables. The article proposes to separate the transaction costs determined by the exchange transaction parties' obligations, subsequently capitalizing and reflecting them in financial (integrated) reporting in the structure of client (reputational) capital.\nConclusions. It is necessary and possible to develop the accounting theory by incorporating new economic phenomena, such as the contractual obligations of the exchange transaction parties. This approach will help change the retrospective view of understanding accounting information to some extent.","PeriodicalId":42055,"journal":{"name":"Intelligenza Artificiale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligenza Artificiale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24891/IA.24.3.252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Subject. This article discusses the issues relating to the reflection of contractual obligations in the accounting system as an economic category of transaction costs. Objectives. The article aims to describe a market-based approach to defining contractual obligations as transaction costs of the organization and the specifics of their separate reflection in the accounting system. It also aims to define the content of the organization's obligations in terms of the rights of claim for economic resources to reduce the gap between accounting theory and institutional theory. Methods. For the study, we used the theory of institutional economics, the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting that help expand the scope of accounting by incorporating market relations reflecting the obligations to provide exchange transactions. Results. The article defines and proves the importance of the obligations of the exchange transaction parties to reflect them in the accounting system, and that transaction costs expressed by obligations determine the future rights of the market agents. The economic content of the exchange transaction parties' contractual obligations is significantly different from the accounting understanding of receivables and payables. The article proposes to separate the transaction costs determined by the exchange transaction parties' obligations, subsequently capitalizing and reflecting them in financial (integrated) reporting in the structure of client (reputational) capital. Conclusions. It is necessary and possible to develop the accounting theory by incorporating new economic phenomena, such as the contractual obligations of the exchange transaction parties. This approach will help change the retrospective view of understanding accounting information to some extent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合同义务是交易所交易成本的组成部分
主题本文讨论了合同义务作为交易成本的一个经济类别在会计制度中的反映问题。目标。本文旨在描述一种基于市场的方法,将合同义务定义为组织的交易成本,以及它们在会计系统中单独反映的具体情况。它还旨在从经济资源请求权的角度界定组织义务的内容,以缩小会计理论与制度理论之间的差距。方法。在这项研究中,我们使用了制度经济学的理论,即财务报告的概念框架,该框架通过纳入反映提供外汇交易义务的市场关系来帮助扩大会计的范围。后果文章定义并证明了交易所交易方义务在会计制度中反映的重要性,以及义务所表示的交易成本决定了市场主体的未来权利。交换交易方合同义务的经济内容与应收账款和应付账款的会计理解存在显著差异。该条建议将由交易所交易方义务确定的交易成本分开,随后将其资本化并反映在客户(声誉)资本结构中的财务(综合)报告中。结论。结合新的经济现象,如交易所交易方的合同义务,发展会计理论是必要的,也是可能的。这种方法将在一定程度上有助于改变对会计信息理解的回顾性观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligenza Artificiale
Intelligenza Artificiale COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Special Issue NL4AI 2022: Workshop on natural language for artificial intelligence User-centric item characteristics for personalized multimedia systems: A systematic review Combining human intelligence and machine learning for fact-checking: Towards a hybrid human-in-the-loop framework A framework for safe decision making: A convex duality approach Grounding End-to-End Pre-trained architectures for Semantic Role Labeling in multiple languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1