Current views on oncolytic adenoviruses for cancer therapy

Sankha Bhattacharya
{"title":"Current views on oncolytic adenoviruses for cancer therapy","authors":"Sankha Bhattacharya","doi":"10.2174/1573394718666220511115638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nOncolytic viruses replicate and spread in tumors at the same time, resulting in increased cytotoxicity and the reversal of tumor immune suppression. Among other viruses, recombinant adenoviruses that replicated in tumor cells were clinically tested via intratumoral or systemic administration. Although oncolytic virus replication kills tumor cells on its own, it may also activate the immune system, which can aid in tumor control. Viruses can be modified to improve their selectivity and effectiveness. Adenovirus genomes can be easily designed to incorporate various tumor-targeting pathways and therapeutic transgenes to improve antitumor properties. Poor tumor targeting, intratumoral expansion, and virocentric immune responses are all linked to low efficacy. As a result, more effective oncolytic adenoviruses that can be used alone or in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy are needed. Oncolytic Adenovirus (OAds) has long been considered a potential biotherapeutic agent against various cancers due to its ability to replicate cancer cells while remaining dormant in healthy cells selectively. Several preclinical studies using genetic engineering technology have increased antitumor OAds in various cancers in recent years. Systemic OAds administration is hampered by poor targeting tropism to healthy tissues, low-level ad receptors on tumor cells, and pre-existing neutralizing antibodies. Various discoveries have been made to overcome these barriers, including stem cells, nanoparticles, polymer shielding, extracellular vesicles, hydrogels, and microparticles (MPs). These carriers may improve Oncolytic viruses’ therapeutic efficacy by improving transfection, circulatory survival, cellular interactions, specific targeting, and immune response. The structure and biology of adenoviruses, the different types of OAds, and the efficacy of different carriers in the systemic administration of OAds were all examined in this review.\n","PeriodicalId":43754,"journal":{"name":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573394718666220511115638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses replicate and spread in tumors at the same time, resulting in increased cytotoxicity and the reversal of tumor immune suppression. Among other viruses, recombinant adenoviruses that replicated in tumor cells were clinically tested via intratumoral or systemic administration. Although oncolytic virus replication kills tumor cells on its own, it may also activate the immune system, which can aid in tumor control. Viruses can be modified to improve their selectivity and effectiveness. Adenovirus genomes can be easily designed to incorporate various tumor-targeting pathways and therapeutic transgenes to improve antitumor properties. Poor tumor targeting, intratumoral expansion, and virocentric immune responses are all linked to low efficacy. As a result, more effective oncolytic adenoviruses that can be used alone or in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy are needed. Oncolytic Adenovirus (OAds) has long been considered a potential biotherapeutic agent against various cancers due to its ability to replicate cancer cells while remaining dormant in healthy cells selectively. Several preclinical studies using genetic engineering technology have increased antitumor OAds in various cancers in recent years. Systemic OAds administration is hampered by poor targeting tropism to healthy tissues, low-level ad receptors on tumor cells, and pre-existing neutralizing antibodies. Various discoveries have been made to overcome these barriers, including stem cells, nanoparticles, polymer shielding, extracellular vesicles, hydrogels, and microparticles (MPs). These carriers may improve Oncolytic viruses’ therapeutic efficacy by improving transfection, circulatory survival, cellular interactions, specific targeting, and immune response. The structure and biology of adenoviruses, the different types of OAds, and the efficacy of different carriers in the systemic administration of OAds were all examined in this review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
溶瘤腺病毒用于癌症治疗的最新观点
溶瘤病毒同时在肿瘤中复制和传播,导致细胞毒性增加和肿瘤免疫抑制的逆转。在其他病毒中,通过肿瘤内或全身给药对在肿瘤细胞中复制的重组腺病毒进行临床测试。尽管溶瘤病毒复制会自行杀死肿瘤细胞,但它也可能激活免疫系统,从而有助于控制肿瘤。可以对病毒进行修饰以提高其选择性和有效性。腺病毒基因组可以很容易地设计成结合各种肿瘤靶向途径和治疗性转基因,以提高抗肿瘤特性。肿瘤靶向性差、肿瘤内扩张和以病毒为中心的免疫反应都与低疗效有关。因此,需要更有效的溶瘤腺病毒,可以单独使用,也可以与化疗或免疫疗法联合使用。溶瘤腺病毒(OAds)长期以来一直被认为是一种潜在的抗各种癌症的生物治疗剂,因为它能够复制癌症细胞,同时选择性地在健康细胞中保持休眠状态。近年来,一些使用基因工程技术的临床前研究增加了各种癌症的抗肿瘤OAd。全身OAds给药受到健康组织靶向性差、肿瘤细胞上低水平ad受体和预先存在的中和抗体的阻碍。为了克服这些障碍,已经有了各种发现,包括干细胞、纳米颗粒、聚合物屏蔽、细胞外囊泡、水凝胶和微粒(MP)。这些载体可以通过改善转染、循环存活、细胞相互作用、特异性靶向和免疫反应来提高溶瘤病毒的治疗效果。本文对腺病毒的结构和生物学、不同类型的OAd以及不同载体在OAd系统给药中的疗效进行了综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Current Cancer Therapy Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in clinical oncology, cancer therapy and pharmacology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cancer therapy.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Challenges Associated with Approval of Anticancer Products to Facilitate the Regulatory Approvals: A Cross-sectional Study Bibliometric Analysis to Improve Combined Treatment Strategies for Glioblastoma in America Odor generation pattern of swine manure according to the processing form of feed. Childhood Heart Tumors: Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatments Metformin (The Miracle Drug) Kinetics in Different Diseases such as Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1