Johann Gottlieb Steeb on Human Diversity: Synthesizing Kant and Blumenbach

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2019-07-19 DOI:10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.7.2.0352
J. V. Gorkom
{"title":"Johann Gottlieb Steeb on Human Diversity: Synthesizing Kant and Blumenbach","authors":"J. V. Gorkom","doi":"10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.7.2.0352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article shows that Johann Gottlieb Steeb supported different aspects of Kant's theory of race. Despite the growing research on Kant's racial and biological theory, one finds no mention of Steeb in these interpretations. However, his work is relevant because of his attempt in 1785 to synthesize Kant's preformationist terminology with Blumenbach's epigenetic theory. This article aims at understanding this synthesis. Recent interpreters of Kant presuppose that preformationism excluded epigenesis. But already in 1785 Steeb saw the possibility of integrating Kant's germs into a discourse that was to a large extent dominated by Blumenbach. Steeb's synthesis primarily implied that the concepts of germs and race could be amended to Blumenbach's understanding of human diversity.","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":"7 1","pages":"352 - 371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.7.2.0352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This article shows that Johann Gottlieb Steeb supported different aspects of Kant's theory of race. Despite the growing research on Kant's racial and biological theory, one finds no mention of Steeb in these interpretations. However, his work is relevant because of his attempt in 1785 to synthesize Kant's preformationist terminology with Blumenbach's epigenetic theory. This article aims at understanding this synthesis. Recent interpreters of Kant presuppose that preformationism excluded epigenesis. But already in 1785 Steeb saw the possibility of integrating Kant's germs into a discourse that was to a large extent dominated by Blumenbach. Steeb's synthesis primarily implied that the concepts of germs and race could be amended to Blumenbach's understanding of human diversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约翰·戈特利布·斯蒂布论人类多样性:康德与布鲁门巴赫的综合
摘要:本文表明约翰·戈特利布·斯蒂布支持康德种族理论的不同方面。尽管对康德的种族和生物学理论的研究越来越多,但人们发现在这些解释中没有提到斯蒂布。然而,他的工作是相关的,因为他在1785年试图将康德的预形成主义术语与Blumenbach的表观遗传理论综合起来。本文旨在理解这种综合。最近对康德的解释假定,预形成论排除了表观发生。但是早在1785年,Steeb就看到了将康德的细菌整合到一个很大程度上由Blumenbach主导的话语中的可能性。Steeb的综合理论主要意味着细菌和种族的概念可以根据Blumenbach对人类多样性的理解进行修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Philosophy of Race
Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.
期刊最新文献
Being Black and Woman in a Racist and Sexist Society: Locating an Existential Standpoint Philosophy in Mamphela Ramphele’s Autobiography Race, Intellectual Racism, and the Opened Door Rodney, Mills, and Rousseau: Revisiting the Social Contract Idea “Why Race Still Matters” Can Iqaba Possess Ontological Legitimacy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1