Fragmentation Analysis of Capisaan Surface Karst Landscape through Changes in Land Use and Land Cover using FRAGSTATS

IF 0.4 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.61310/mndjstecbe.1049.23
Jayson Caranza, Margaret M. Calderon, Rico C. Ancog, Myrna G. Carandang, C. Rebancos
{"title":"Fragmentation Analysis of Capisaan Surface Karst Landscape through Changes in Land Use and Land Cover using FRAGSTATS","authors":"Jayson Caranza, Margaret M. Calderon, Rico C. Ancog, Myrna G. Carandang, C. Rebancos","doi":"10.61310/mndjstecbe.1049.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in land cover mainly brought by humans could alter how landscapes function, which has an impact on the variety and health of the local biota. This study examined the fragmentation shifts of the Capisaan Cave System surface landscape by looking at changes in land use and land cover using Landsat images, ArcGIS and Google Earth imageries to generate classified land covers for the years 2001, 2005, 2010, 2016 and 2019. Fragmentation was analyzed through FRAGSTATS with forest; shrubland and orchard (SO); and agriculture and clearing (AC) as class types. Results showed that the most significant change in the landscape was in the year 2010 with AC significantly increasing its area and aggregation causing other class types to exhibit more fragmentation. Forest and SO covers displayed huge losses indicated by decreased class area and average size of patches accompanied by a more subdivided landscape shown by their increased number of patches. Although forest and SO slightly recovered in the class area in 2016, values were far from recovering to 2001 values. FRAGSTATS data suggest lowering biodiversity values and paying importance to reserve size in the maintenance of species diversity. The edge effect as a result of class and landscape fragmentation in forest vegetation might have been reduced at the landscape level as indicated by the reduced fractal dimension, as well as sustaining patch cohesion and increased clumpiness. However, abatement of edge effect could be easily limited and reversed if the reduction of the total area of forest available in the landscape continues.","PeriodicalId":40697,"journal":{"name":"Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61310/mndjstecbe.1049.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in land cover mainly brought by humans could alter how landscapes function, which has an impact on the variety and health of the local biota. This study examined the fragmentation shifts of the Capisaan Cave System surface landscape by looking at changes in land use and land cover using Landsat images, ArcGIS and Google Earth imageries to generate classified land covers for the years 2001, 2005, 2010, 2016 and 2019. Fragmentation was analyzed through FRAGSTATS with forest; shrubland and orchard (SO); and agriculture and clearing (AC) as class types. Results showed that the most significant change in the landscape was in the year 2010 with AC significantly increasing its area and aggregation causing other class types to exhibit more fragmentation. Forest and SO covers displayed huge losses indicated by decreased class area and average size of patches accompanied by a more subdivided landscape shown by their increased number of patches. Although forest and SO slightly recovered in the class area in 2016, values were far from recovering to 2001 values. FRAGSTATS data suggest lowering biodiversity values and paying importance to reserve size in the maintenance of species diversity. The edge effect as a result of class and landscape fragmentation in forest vegetation might have been reduced at the landscape level as indicated by the reduced fractal dimension, as well as sustaining patch cohesion and increased clumpiness. However, abatement of edge effect could be easily limited and reversed if the reduction of the total area of forest available in the landscape continues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于FRAGSTATS的土地利用和土地覆盖变化对Capisaan地表岩溶景观的碎片化分析
主要由人类带来的土地覆盖变化可能会改变景观的功能,从而影响当地生物群的多样性和健康。本研究通过使用Landsat图像、ArcGIS和Google Earth图像来观察土地利用和土地覆盖的变化,以生成2001年、2005年、2010年、2016年和2019年的分类土地覆盖,从而研究了Capisaan洞穴系统地表景观的碎片化变化。碎片化通过森林的FRAGSTATS进行分析;灌木林和果园(SO);以及农业和清算(AC)作为类别类型。结果显示,景观变化最显著的是在2010年,AC的面积和聚集性显著增加,导致其他类别表现出更多的碎片化。森林和SO覆盖显示出巨大的损失,表现为等级面积和斑块的平均大小的减少,伴随着斑块数量的增加,景观更加细分。尽管2016年该类地区的森林和SO略有恢复,但价值远未恢复到2001年的价值。FRAGSTATS的数据表明,在维持物种多样性方面,降低了生物多样性的价值,并重视保护区的规模。森林植被类别和景观破碎化产生的边缘效应可能在景观层面上有所减少,如分形维数的降低所示,同时也保持了斑块的内聚性和结块性的增加。然而,如果景观中可用森林总面积的减少继续下去,边缘效应的消除可能很容易受到限制和逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology
Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Fragmentation Analysis of Capisaan Surface Karst Landscape through Changes in Land Use and Land Cover using FRAGSTATS Sustainable Management for Spiralling Whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Infesting Guava and Its Effects on the Natural Enemies’ Complex Prevalence of Streptococci spp. and Unexpected Non-Streptococci Strains Associated with Bovine Mastitis Infection in Dairy Cattle in Region IV-A, Philippines Building the Waray-waray Neural Language Model using Recurrent Neural Network Utilization of Forage Crops as an Effective and Eco-friendly Method for Weed Growth Control and Distribution in an Immature Rubber Plantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1