Constrained by Localized Attention Focus: The Negative Effect of Firm-Specific Knowledge on Exploratory Firm Innovation

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1017/mor.2023.11
B. N. Sullivan, Kaixian Mao, Heli Wang
{"title":"Constrained by Localized Attention Focus: The Negative Effect of Firm-Specific Knowledge on Exploratory Firm Innovation","authors":"B. N. Sullivan, Kaixian Mao, Heli Wang","doi":"10.1017/mor.2023.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Integrating the resource-based view (RBV) and attention-based view (ABV), this study explores the impact of firm-specific knowledge (FSK) on a firm's exploratory innovation and the role of government support in this process. We argue that firms with a high degree of specificity in their knowledge assets tend to have a more localized attention focus, leading to those firms with less exposure to distant and diverse information and knowledge. Consequently, such firms are likely to have reduced exploratory innovative outputs. However, government resource support could expand a firm's attention focus beyond local searches, mitigating its negative effects. Based on a unique combined two-wave survey and archival data from over 500 firms in China, we find that the level of FSK is negatively related to a firm's exploratory innovation output. We provide evidence that localized attention focus partially mediates the negative effect of FSK on firms’ exploratory innovation. We further reveal that state ownership and state financial support for firm innovation weaken the negative main effect. This study makes important contributions to the literatures on the RBV, FSK, and firm innovation.","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2023.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating the resource-based view (RBV) and attention-based view (ABV), this study explores the impact of firm-specific knowledge (FSK) on a firm's exploratory innovation and the role of government support in this process. We argue that firms with a high degree of specificity in their knowledge assets tend to have a more localized attention focus, leading to those firms with less exposure to distant and diverse information and knowledge. Consequently, such firms are likely to have reduced exploratory innovative outputs. However, government resource support could expand a firm's attention focus beyond local searches, mitigating its negative effects. Based on a unique combined two-wave survey and archival data from over 500 firms in China, we find that the level of FSK is negatively related to a firm's exploratory innovation output. We provide evidence that localized attention focus partially mediates the negative effect of FSK on firms’ exploratory innovation. We further reveal that state ownership and state financial support for firm innovation weaken the negative main effect. This study makes important contributions to the literatures on the RBV, FSK, and firm innovation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部关注约束:企业特有知识对探索性企业创新的负面影响
本研究将基于资源的观点(RBV)和基于注意力的观点(ABV)相结合,探讨了企业特定知识(FSK)对企业探索性创新的影响以及政府支持在这一过程中的作用。我们认为,知识资产具有高度特异性的公司往往具有更本地化的注意力焦点,导致这些公司较少接触到遥远和多样化的信息和知识。因此,这些公司的探索性创新产出可能会减少。然而,政府资源支持可以将公司的注意力扩展到本地搜索之外,减轻其负面影响。基于一项独特的双波调查和来自中国500多家企业的档案数据,我们发现FSK水平与企业的探索性创新产出呈负相关。我们提供的证据表明,局部注意力集中在一定程度上中介了FSK对企业探索性创新的负面影响。我们进一步揭示了国家所有制和国家财政对企业创新的支持弱化了负主效应。本研究对RBV、FSK和企业创新的研究有重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Corporate Social Irresponsibility in Business: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda Working with a Mask: How and When Workplace Mask Wearing Decreases Employee Emotional Exhaustion Commentary on Perspective Article: ‘Institutional Logics: Motivating Action and Overcoming Resistance to Change’ – Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, and Danyang Li
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1