Knowledge Production in Organization Development: An Interiority-based Perspective

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14697017.2019.1628086
D. Coghlan, A. Shani, P. C. Dahm
{"title":"Knowledge Production in Organization Development: An Interiority-based Perspective","authors":"D. Coghlan, A. Shani, P. C. Dahm","doi":"10.1080/14697017.2019.1628086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Contemporary social science philosophy is bedevilled with debates about the nature of knowledge production. This article introduces the philosophical notion of interiority whereby, by focusing on the operations of knowledge production in the human mind, OD scholars and researchers can ground Modes 1 and 2 in a bigger picture of what is common to all research. This perspective which recognizes different ways of knowing in different situations cuts through the polarized differences between Modes 1 and 2. Rather than looking at what is different between them this article explores their complementarity through an interiority-based OD research framework. MAD statement This article focuses on how knowledge is produced in the field of organization development (OD). Mode 1 produces knowledge in a disciplinary context and aims at producing scientific knowledge. Mode 2 focuses on creating knowledge for practical use through a partnership between researchers and practitioners. Both modes are valuable for managers and OD practitioners for how they contribute to knowledge production. A comprehensive framework based on six macrophases in OD knowledge production is advanced by focusing on kind of knowledge that is needed for what purpose (an activity of the human mind which we call interiority).","PeriodicalId":47003,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","volume":"20 1","pages":"81 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14697017.2019.1628086","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2019.1628086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contemporary social science philosophy is bedevilled with debates about the nature of knowledge production. This article introduces the philosophical notion of interiority whereby, by focusing on the operations of knowledge production in the human mind, OD scholars and researchers can ground Modes 1 and 2 in a bigger picture of what is common to all research. This perspective which recognizes different ways of knowing in different situations cuts through the polarized differences between Modes 1 and 2. Rather than looking at what is different between them this article explores their complementarity through an interiority-based OD research framework. MAD statement This article focuses on how knowledge is produced in the field of organization development (OD). Mode 1 produces knowledge in a disciplinary context and aims at producing scientific knowledge. Mode 2 focuses on creating knowledge for practical use through a partnership between researchers and practitioners. Both modes are valuable for managers and OD practitioners for how they contribute to knowledge production. A comprehensive framework based on six macrophases in OD knowledge production is advanced by focusing on kind of knowledge that is needed for what purpose (an activity of the human mind which we call interiority).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织发展中的知识生产:基于内部性的视角
当代社会科学哲学充斥着关于知识生产本质的争论。本文介绍了内在性的哲学概念,通过关注人类思维中知识生产的运作,OD学者和研究人员可以将模式1和2建立在所有研究的共同点的更大图景中。这种观点认识到在不同情况下的不同认知方式,从而突破了模式1和模式2之间的两极分化差异。本文通过基于内部性的OD研究框架,探讨了它们之间的互补性,而不是考察它们之间的不同。MAD声明本文关注的是知识是如何在组织发展(OD)领域产生的。模式1在学科背景下产生知识,旨在产生科学知识。模式2侧重于通过研究人员和从业者之间的伙伴关系创造实用知识。这两种模式对管理者和OD从业者如何为知识生产做出贡献都很有价值。基于OD知识生产的六个宏观阶段,通过关注什么目的所需的知识类型(我们称之为内在性的人类思维活动),提出了一个全面的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Journal of Change Management is a multidisciplinary and international forum for critical, mainstream and alternative contributions - focusing as much on psychology, ethics, culture and behaviour as on structure and process. JCM is a platform for open and challenging dialogue and a thorough critique of established as well as alternative practices. JCM is aiming to provide all authors with a first decision within six weeks of submission.
期刊最新文献
Navigating Tensions in the Organizational Change Process towards Hybrid Workspace It’s Not All About the Self: Exploring the Interplay Between Self-leadership and the Social Work Environment ‘Changing the Course of a Super Tanker’: A Study of Senior and Junior Managers’ Enactments of a Transition Narrative What Makes Us See Someone as a Leader? A Field Theory Approach The Fair Share – Multilevel Distributive Justice as Cross-Level Moderator for the Impact of Restructuring Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1