Comparison of Deformation Vectors Due to Earthquake in Subduction Zone and Sumatran Fault for Each Phase of Earthquake Cycle

F. Monica, Vira Friska, D. Arisa, Marzuki Marzuki
{"title":"Comparison of Deformation Vectors Due to Earthquake in Subduction Zone and Sumatran Fault for Each Phase of Earthquake Cycle","authors":"F. Monica, Vira Friska, D. Arisa, Marzuki Marzuki","doi":"10.25077/jif.14.2.73-85.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the deformation in West Sumatra due to the earthquakes in the subduction zone and the Sumatran Fault. The Mw6.0 Mentawai earthquake 2019 with a thrust fault mechanism and the Mw5.4 South Solok earthquake 2019 with a strike-slip fault mechanism were used as case studies for the subduction zone and Sumatran Fault, respectively. The deformation was observed using 12 SuGAr (Sumatra GPS Array) and 8 InaCORS (Indonesian Continuously Operating Reference Station) stations, which were processed using GAMIT/GLOBK software. There are differences in the deformation vectors of the two earthquakes. The Mentawai earthquake experienced larger energy accumulation than the South Solok earthquake. The coseismic phase of the Mentawai earthquake experienced the largest horizontal shift at the SLBU station, which was 15.48 mm in the direction of S29.96W, while the South Solok earthquake is found to horizontally shift the CSDH station at the size of 5.75 mm towards S11.45E. The postseismic phase of the Mentawai earthquake lasted 60 days, longer than the South Solok earthquake (20 days). The difference in deformation characteristic between these two earthquakes found in this study will be valuable information in modeling earthquakes in Sumatra.","PeriodicalId":52720,"journal":{"name":"JIF Jurnal Ilmu Fisika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIF Jurnal Ilmu Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/jif.14.2.73-85.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study compares the deformation in West Sumatra due to the earthquakes in the subduction zone and the Sumatran Fault. The Mw6.0 Mentawai earthquake 2019 with a thrust fault mechanism and the Mw5.4 South Solok earthquake 2019 with a strike-slip fault mechanism were used as case studies for the subduction zone and Sumatran Fault, respectively. The deformation was observed using 12 SuGAr (Sumatra GPS Array) and 8 InaCORS (Indonesian Continuously Operating Reference Station) stations, which were processed using GAMIT/GLOBK software. There are differences in the deformation vectors of the two earthquakes. The Mentawai earthquake experienced larger energy accumulation than the South Solok earthquake. The coseismic phase of the Mentawai earthquake experienced the largest horizontal shift at the SLBU station, which was 15.48 mm in the direction of S29.96W, while the South Solok earthquake is found to horizontally shift the CSDH station at the size of 5.75 mm towards S11.45E. The postseismic phase of the Mentawai earthquake lasted 60 days, longer than the South Solok earthquake (20 days). The difference in deformation characteristic between these two earthquakes found in this study will be valuable information in modeling earthquakes in Sumatra.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俯冲带与苏门答腊断裂地震周期各期地震变形向量比较
本文比较了西苏门答腊地区俯冲带地震和苏门答腊断层地震引起的形变。以具有逆冲断层机制的2019年明打威Mw6.0地震和具有走滑断层机制的2019年南索洛Mw5.4地震分别为俯冲带和苏门答腊断层的案例研究。利用12个SuGAr(苏门答腊GPS阵列)站和8个InaCORS(印度尼西亚连续运行参考站)站观测变形,采用GAMIT/GLOBK软件进行处理。这两次地震的变形矢量是不同的。明打威地震比南索洛克地震经历了更大的能量积累。明打威地震同震相在SLBU台站水平偏移最大,向S29.96W方向偏移15.48 mm,而南索洛地震使CSDH台站水平偏移5.75 mm,向S11.45E方向偏移。明打威地震的震后阶段持续了60天,比南索洛克地震(20天)要长。本研究中发现的这两次地震变形特征的差异将为苏门答腊地震模拟提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of River Flow and Water Quality Using IOT-based Smart Buoys Environment Monitoring System Particle Size Improvement and Layer Absorption of Metil Halida MAPbI3 Perovskite Doping Phenethylammonium Iodide (PEAI) Efficiency at Maximum Power of Endoreversible Quantum Otto Engine with Partial Thermalization in 3D Harmonic Potential Wind Gust Parameterization Assessment under Convective and Non-convective Events: A Case Study at the Kertajati International Airport An Analysis of the Schrodinger Equation Model for the Distribution Rate of Stock Returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1