Necropolitical Screens: Digital Image, Propriety, Racialization

Q3 Arts and Humanities Nordic Journal of Aesthetics Pub Date : 2021-07-02 DOI:10.7146/nja.v30i61-62.127885
Marina Gržinić
{"title":"Necropolitical Screens: Digital Image, Propriety, Racialization","authors":"Marina Gržinić","doi":"10.7146/nja.v30i61-62.127885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How are racism, colonialism, classism, and exploitation re/ produced in images today? This will be my main question. What is the image’s “relation to the imperial, colonial, necropolitical and racial line that cuts global neoliberal capitalism from within and heavily conditions contemporary necropolitical capitalist production” and its financialized/digital images?1 My attempt here is to radicalize the status of images of the digital (financial) mode of production.2 Much like the novel in the 19th century—that as a cultural form allowed the spreading of colonialism despite the monstrous history of racial slavery’s violence, which gave rise to supremacist orders of modernity in the Americas and the imperial capitalist world—the digital image, albeit floats, sustains the race/class/ colonial /exploitative divide. This may sound as a pretty doubtful statement; given all is floating, digital, laisse-faire, borderless? One of the hypotheses I share is that every period of capitalism developed its proper form of extreme re/production. Capitalism is always extreme, and we have to redefine, reformulate what is it that this extreme entails. Technology provides a direct boost to capitalism.","PeriodicalId":38858,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v30i61-62.127885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How are racism, colonialism, classism, and exploitation re/ produced in images today? This will be my main question. What is the image’s “relation to the imperial, colonial, necropolitical and racial line that cuts global neoliberal capitalism from within and heavily conditions contemporary necropolitical capitalist production” and its financialized/digital images?1 My attempt here is to radicalize the status of images of the digital (financial) mode of production.2 Much like the novel in the 19th century—that as a cultural form allowed the spreading of colonialism despite the monstrous history of racial slavery’s violence, which gave rise to supremacist orders of modernity in the Americas and the imperial capitalist world—the digital image, albeit floats, sustains the race/class/ colonial /exploitative divide. This may sound as a pretty doubtful statement; given all is floating, digital, laisse-faire, borderless? One of the hypotheses I share is that every period of capitalism developed its proper form of extreme re/production. Capitalism is always extreme, and we have to redefine, reformulate what is it that this extreme entails. Technology provides a direct boost to capitalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死灵政治屏幕:数字图像、礼仪、种族化
今天,种族主义、殖民主义、阶级主义和剥削是如何在图像中重现的?这将是我的主要问题。这张照片“与帝国、殖民地、坏死政治和种族界线的关系是什么?这种界线从内部切割了全球新自由主义资本主义,并严重制约了当代坏死政治资本主义生产”及其金融化/数字图像?1我在这里的尝试是激进化数字(金融)生产模式图像的地位。2就像19世纪的小说一样——尽管种族奴隶制的暴力历史令人震惊,但作为一种文化形式,殖民主义还是得以传播,这在美洲和帝国资本主义世界引发了现代性的至上主义秩序——数字图像,尽管是浮动的,但却维持着种族/阶级/殖民地/剥削性的鸿沟。这听起来可能是一个相当可疑的说法;考虑到一切都是浮动的、数字的、自由的、无边界的?我赞同的一个假设是,资本主义的每一个时期都发展出了正确的极端再生产形式。资本主义总是极端的,我们必须重新定义、重新表述这种极端意味着什么。技术为资本主义提供了直接的推动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Your Tongue Here (Or Not): On Imagining Whether To Take a Bite (Or Not) Stay with Me: Uncertain Indices and Attentional Presence in Chat Interfaces Kant's "Aesthetic Idea": Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention Nothing to See? Paying Attention in the Dark Environment Attention, Affect, and Aesthetic Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1