Response to Dusík and Bond

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.1080/14615517.2022.2038534
R. Slootweg
{"title":"Response to Dusík and Bond","authors":"R. Slootweg","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2038534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Dusík and Bond introduce the EU taxonomy on green finance as an opportunity to kick off the much-needed revolution in environmental impact assessment (EIA). The persistent weaknesses of EIA lead to negative trade-offs between the social, economic, and environmental domains. In my response, I attribute the apparent weakness of EIA to processes in society, and not so much to the instrument itself. Weaknesses that may hinder the implementation of the EU taxonomy as well. Yet, there seems to be a window of opportunity in society, to move from the limited and flawed ‘do not harm’ approach to a transition-focused ‘do good’ approach. The taxonomy provides a way forward, and EIA has the potential to avoid the taxonomy from becoming a green washing instrument. But it is the EIA community that has to take the necessary steps; the financial world will not look to the EIA for help.","PeriodicalId":47528,"journal":{"name":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","volume":"40 1","pages":"99 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2022.2038534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dusík and Bond introduce the EU taxonomy on green finance as an opportunity to kick off the much-needed revolution in environmental impact assessment (EIA). The persistent weaknesses of EIA lead to negative trade-offs between the social, economic, and environmental domains. In my response, I attribute the apparent weakness of EIA to processes in society, and not so much to the instrument itself. Weaknesses that may hinder the implementation of the EU taxonomy as well. Yet, there seems to be a window of opportunity in society, to move from the limited and flawed ‘do not harm’ approach to a transition-focused ‘do good’ approach. The taxonomy provides a way forward, and EIA has the potential to avoid the taxonomy from becoming a green washing instrument. But it is the EIA community that has to take the necessary steps; the financial world will not look to the EIA for help.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回复Dusík和Bond
Dusík和Bond介绍了欧盟的绿色金融分类,以此为契机,开启了急需的环境影响评估(EIA)革命。环境影响评价的持续薄弱导致了社会、经济和环境领域之间的负面权衡。在我的回答中,我将环境影响评估的明显弱点归咎于社会进程,而不是工具本身。这些弱点也可能阻碍欧盟分类法的实施。然而,社会上似乎有机会从有限和有缺陷的“不伤害”方法转向以过渡为重点的“做好事”方法。该分类法提供了前进的方向,而EIA有可能避免分类法成为绿色洗涤工具。但是,环评界必须采取必要的措施;金融界不会指望EIA提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
22.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This is the international, peer-reviewed journal of the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA). It covers environmental, social, health and other impact assessments, cost-benefit analysis, technology assessment, and other approaches to anticipating and managing impacts. It has readers in universities, government and public agencies, consultancies, NGOs and elsewhere in over 100 countries. It has editorials, main articles, book reviews, and a professional practice section.
期刊最新文献
A game theoretic decision-making approach to reduce mine closure risks throughout the mine-life cycle Consideration of risks to people and the environment related to accidents on natural gas transmission pipelines in LUP and SEA processes in Poland Landscape, EIA and decision-making. A case study of the Vistula Spit Canal, Poland SEA and EIA: uncertain boundaries in Spain Influence factors on the quality of regulatory impact analysis in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1