Row orientation affects the uniformity of light absorption, but hardly affects crop photosynthesis in hedgerow tomato crops

IF 2.6 Q1 AGRONOMY in silico Plants Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1093/insilicoplants/diab025
M. van der Meer, P. D. de Visser, E. Heuvelink, L. Marcelis
{"title":"Row orientation affects the uniformity of light absorption, but hardly affects crop photosynthesis in hedgerow tomato crops","authors":"M. van der Meer, P. D. de Visser, E. Heuvelink, L. Marcelis","doi":"10.1093/insilicoplants/diab025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Light distribution within canopies is important for plant growth. We aimed to quantify the influence of row orientation on inter- and within-row variation of light absorption and photosynthesis in a hedgerow crop. An experiment with two row orientations of a tomato crop was conducted which was then used to calibrate a functional–structural plant model (FSPM). The FSPM was used to analyse light absorption and photosynthesis for each of the row facing directions in the double-row trellis system (e.g. north- and south-facing rows for the east–west row orientation). The measured leaf area decreased by 18 % and specific leaf area by 10 %, while fruit dry weight increased by 7 % for south-facing compared to north-facing rows, but total plant dry weight did not significantly differ. Model simulations showed a 7 % higher light absorption for the south-facing rows than north-facing rows, while net photosynthesis was surprisingly −4 % lower, due to local light saturation. When in the model leaf area was kept equal between the rows, light absorption for the south-facing rows was 19 % and net photosynthesis 8 % higher than for north-facing rows. We conclude that although south-facing rows would be expected to have a higher photosynthesis than north-facing rows, plants can adapt their morphology such that differences in light absorption and photosynthesis between north- and south-facing rows are minimal. Rows oriented north–south were more uniform in light absorption and photosynthesis than east–west rows, but the overall crop light absorption and photosynthesis were minimally affected (both 3 % lower compared to east–west orientation).","PeriodicalId":36138,"journal":{"name":"in silico Plants","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in silico Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diab025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Light distribution within canopies is important for plant growth. We aimed to quantify the influence of row orientation on inter- and within-row variation of light absorption and photosynthesis in a hedgerow crop. An experiment with two row orientations of a tomato crop was conducted which was then used to calibrate a functional–structural plant model (FSPM). The FSPM was used to analyse light absorption and photosynthesis for each of the row facing directions in the double-row trellis system (e.g. north- and south-facing rows for the east–west row orientation). The measured leaf area decreased by 18 % and specific leaf area by 10 %, while fruit dry weight increased by 7 % for south-facing compared to north-facing rows, but total plant dry weight did not significantly differ. Model simulations showed a 7 % higher light absorption for the south-facing rows than north-facing rows, while net photosynthesis was surprisingly −4 % lower, due to local light saturation. When in the model leaf area was kept equal between the rows, light absorption for the south-facing rows was 19 % and net photosynthesis 8 % higher than for north-facing rows. We conclude that although south-facing rows would be expected to have a higher photosynthesis than north-facing rows, plants can adapt their morphology such that differences in light absorption and photosynthesis between north- and south-facing rows are minimal. Rows oriented north–south were more uniform in light absorption and photosynthesis than east–west rows, but the overall crop light absorption and photosynthesis were minimally affected (both 3 % lower compared to east–west orientation).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行距对篱内番茄作物光吸收均匀性有影响,但对作物光合作用影响不大
冠层内的光分布对植物生长很重要。我们的目的是量化行取向对植物篱作物行间和行内光吸收和光合作用变化的影响。对番茄作物进行了两行定向试验,并用该试验校准了功能-结构植物模型(FSPM)。FSPM用于分析双排格架系统中每个面向方向的光吸收和光合作用(例如,东西行方向的朝北和朝南行)。朝南行比朝北行测定叶面积减少18%,比叶面积减少10%,果实干重增加7%,但植株总干重差异不显著。模型模拟显示,朝南的植物比朝北的植物吸收的光多7%,而由于局部光饱和,净光合作用惊人地低- 4%。在样板叶面积保持行间相等的情况下,朝南行的光吸收比朝北行的高19%,净光合作用比朝北行的高8%。我们得出的结论是,虽然朝南的植物比朝北的植物有更高的光合作用,但植物可以适应它们的形态,使朝北和朝南的植物在光吸收和光合作用方面的差异最小。南北向行比东西向行在光吸收和光合作用方面更均匀,但对作物整体光吸收和光合作用的影响最小(均比东西向低3%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
in silico Plants
in silico Plants Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Model-based inference of a dual role for HOPS in regulating guard cell vacuole fusion. Playing a crop simulation model using symbols and sounds: the ‘mandala’ A Scalable Pipeline to Create Synthetic Datasets from Functional-Structural Plant Models for Deep Learning In a PICKLE: A gold standard entity and relation corpus for the molecular plant sciences A comparison of empirical and mechanistic models for wheat yield prediction at field level in Moroccan rainfed areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1