Engagement partner specialization and corporate disclosure transparency

Hua Lee , Hsien-Li Lee , Chen-Chin Wang
{"title":"Engagement partner specialization and corporate disclosure transparency","authors":"Hua Lee ,&nbsp;Hsien-Li Lee ,&nbsp;Chen-Chin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.intacc.2017.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores the association of audit partners' industry specialization with corporate disclosure transparency and the latter's informativeness. The distinctive institutional designs of partner signature requirement and Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System (<em>IDTRS</em>) adopted in Taiwan allow us to empirically address the issue. We posit and find that the rankings from the <em>IDTRS</em> are higher for firms audited by industry specialist engagement partners than for firms audited by non-specialist engagement partners. Additionally, the results show that the probability of informed trade (<em>PIN</em>) proxy for information asymmetry is negatively associated with the rankings for clients of industry specialist engagement partners, but not for clients of industry non-specialist engagement partners. The results are robust with respect to alternative estimation method and alternative measures of industry specialization. Overall, the evidence suggests that industry specialist engagement partners enhance the credibility of corporate disclosure transparency, through which information asymmetry is further declined. The evidence provides policy implications to the partner signature requirement adopted in Taiwan and China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101232,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Accounting","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 354-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intacc.2017.10.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020706316300991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This paper explores the association of audit partners' industry specialization with corporate disclosure transparency and the latter's informativeness. The distinctive institutional designs of partner signature requirement and Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System (IDTRS) adopted in Taiwan allow us to empirically address the issue. We posit and find that the rankings from the IDTRS are higher for firms audited by industry specialist engagement partners than for firms audited by non-specialist engagement partners. Additionally, the results show that the probability of informed trade (PIN) proxy for information asymmetry is negatively associated with the rankings for clients of industry specialist engagement partners, but not for clients of industry non-specialist engagement partners. The results are robust with respect to alternative estimation method and alternative measures of industry specialization. Overall, the evidence suggests that industry specialist engagement partners enhance the credibility of corporate disclosure transparency, through which information asymmetry is further declined. The evidence provides policy implications to the partner signature requirement adopted in Taiwan and China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
业务合作伙伴专业化和公司信息披露透明度
本文探讨了审计合伙人的行业专业化与公司信息披露透明度及其信息量的关系。台湾独特的合作伙伴签名制度设计和资讯披露与透明度排名制度(IDTRS),让我们可以从经验上解决这个问题。我们假设并发现,由行业专家审计合伙人审计的公司在IDTRS中的排名高于由非专业审计合伙人审计的公司。此外,结果表明,信息不对称的知情交易(PIN)代理概率与行业专业业务合作伙伴客户的排名呈负相关,但与行业非专业业务合作伙伴客户的排名无关。对于行业专业化的替代估计方法和替代度量,结果是稳健的。总体而言,证据表明行业专家参与伙伴提高了企业信息披露透明度的可信度,从而进一步降低了信息不对称。研究结果对台湾和中国采用的合作伙伴签名要求提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Reporting and the Informativeness of Financial Analysts’ Stock Recommendations Climate-Related Financial Risk: Insights from a Semisystematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Financial Reporting Informal Institutions and Audit Pricing: Cross-Country Evidence of National Culture and Audit Fees Discussion of “Climate-Related Financial Risk: Insights from a Semisystematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Financial Reporting” Choice of Participation Method in Setting International Accounting Standards: Evidence from EFRAG as an Intermediary for Indirect Participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1