Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210219
G. Hanley, Jin-zhu Niu, Jihee Han, S. Fung, H. Bryant, J. Kwon, D. Huntsman, Sarah J. Finlayson, J. McAlpine, Dianne Miller, C. Earle
{"title":"Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis","authors":"G. Hanley, Jin-zhu Niu, Jihee Han, S. Fung, H. Bryant, J. Kwon, D. Huntsman, Sarah J. Finlayson, J. McAlpine, Dianne Miller, C. Earle","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period. Methods: Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations. Results: A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS). Interpretation: The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period. Methods: Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations. Results: A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS). Interpretation: The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011 - 2016年机会性输卵管切除术:描述性分析
背景:机会性输卵管切除术(Opportunistic salpingectomy, OS)是指在子宫切除术过程中出于良性指征切除输卵管或代替输卵管结扎,以预防卵巢癌。我们确定了子宫切除术和输卵管绝育时的OS率,并检查了它们在研究期间的变化情况。方法:使用加拿大卫生信息研究所出院摘要数据库和加拿大所有省份和地区(魁北克省除外)2011 - 2016财政年度的国家门诊护理报告系统的数据,我们对所有15岁及以上接受子宫切除术或输卵管绝育的患者进行了描述性分析。我们排除了那些有任何妇科癌症诊断代码和接受单侧输卵管切除术的患者。我们检查了在子宫切除术中发生卵巢脱落的比例,并比较了输卵管绝育发生卵巢脱落的比例和输卵管结扎的比例。结果:研究共纳入318528名参与者(平均年龄42.5岁)。包含OS的子宫切除术比例从2011年的15.4%上升到2016年的35.5%。在输卵管绝育方面,手术成功率从2011年的6.5%上升到2016年的22.0%。2016年,各司法管辖区的差异相当大,不列颠哥伦比亚省的比例最高(53.2%的子宫切除术和74.0%的输卵管绝育手术涉及OS)。解释:2011年至2016年期间,OS的发生率有所上升,但在所包括的司法管辖区之间存在相当大的差异。我们的研究表明,在许多包括在内的司法管辖区,OS率还有上升的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study". Neighbourhood deprivation, distance to nearest comprehensive stroke centre and access to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Social determinants of access to timely elective surgery in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional population level study. The success of publicly funded rotavirus vaccine programs for preventing community- and hospital-acquired rotavirus infections in Canadian pediatric hospitals: an observational study. Trends in hospital coding for people experiencing homelessness in Canada, 2015-2020: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1