Differences Between Traditional and Modern Technology in the Acquisition of New Ski Knowledge

Q4 Social Sciences Studia Sportiva Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.5817/sts2022-2-27
Marin Marinovic, Danijela Kuna, Ivan Macan
{"title":"Differences Between Traditional and Modern Technology in the Acquisition of New Ski Knowledge","authors":"Marin Marinovic, Danijela Kuna, Ivan Macan","doi":"10.5817/sts2022-2-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Video materials have been used as teaching tools for many years. With the development of modern technology, new video devices have appeared that have greatly improved the quality and capabilities of video materials. This study was conducted with the purpose of investigating and comparing the current traditional and modern ways of recording ski elements. In the traditional way of recording, the cameraman stands on the ski slope and uses a camera to record a demonstration of the ski element of the skier moving toward him. On the other hand, the modern way of recording was made with the Gopro 360 max, which allows you to record video while skiing. \nMethods: The sample of respondents who evaluated the quality of the traditional and the Gopro 360 max videos for three skiing elements consisted of 149 students (105 male and 44 female) from the Faculty of Kinesiology Osijek. Prior to the video quality assessment test, the performance of the ski elements was explained to the students using traditional and modern video footage. When solving the ski knowledge test, students had the opportunity to watch and use traditional and/or modern videos. \nResults: The average score that students achieved on the ski knowledge test was 8.9 ± 2.48 points (74.16 ± 0.21%). When evaluating the quality and contribution of the videos, students rated the usefulness of the traditional method of video recording with an average score of 3.01 ± 1.25, while the modern method of video recording received an average usefulness score of 3.79 ± 1.07. The difference between the traditional and modern video recording was statistically significant at the p < 0.01 level. \nConclusion: The obtained results indicate that the way the Gopro360 max records and presents the skiing elements contributes significantly to the quality of the presentation and the acquisition of specific skiing knowledge compared to the traditional recording method. \nKeywords: Gopro360 max, ski elements, knowledge test","PeriodicalId":36179,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sportiva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sportiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/sts2022-2-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Video materials have been used as teaching tools for many years. With the development of modern technology, new video devices have appeared that have greatly improved the quality and capabilities of video materials. This study was conducted with the purpose of investigating and comparing the current traditional and modern ways of recording ski elements. In the traditional way of recording, the cameraman stands on the ski slope and uses a camera to record a demonstration of the ski element of the skier moving toward him. On the other hand, the modern way of recording was made with the Gopro 360 max, which allows you to record video while skiing. Methods: The sample of respondents who evaluated the quality of the traditional and the Gopro 360 max videos for three skiing elements consisted of 149 students (105 male and 44 female) from the Faculty of Kinesiology Osijek. Prior to the video quality assessment test, the performance of the ski elements was explained to the students using traditional and modern video footage. When solving the ski knowledge test, students had the opportunity to watch and use traditional and/or modern videos. Results: The average score that students achieved on the ski knowledge test was 8.9 ± 2.48 points (74.16 ± 0.21%). When evaluating the quality and contribution of the videos, students rated the usefulness of the traditional method of video recording with an average score of 3.01 ± 1.25, while the modern method of video recording received an average usefulness score of 3.79 ± 1.07. The difference between the traditional and modern video recording was statistically significant at the p < 0.01 level. Conclusion: The obtained results indicate that the way the Gopro360 max records and presents the skiing elements contributes significantly to the quality of the presentation and the acquisition of specific skiing knowledge compared to the traditional recording method. Keywords: Gopro360 max, ski elements, knowledge test
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滑雪新知识获取中传统技术与现代技术的差异
用途:视频材料作为教学工具已使用多年。随着现代技术的发展,新型视频设备的出现大大提高了视频材料的质量和性能。本研究的目的是调查和比较当前传统和现代的滑雪要素记录方法。在传统的记录方式中,摄影师站在滑雪坡上,用相机记录滑雪者向他移动的滑雪元素的演示。另一方面,现代的录制方式是Gopro 360 max,它可以让你在滑雪时录制视频。方法:选取来自俄西耶克大学运动学院的149名学生(男105名,女44名)作为调查对象,对传统和Gopro 360 max三个滑雪项目的视频质量进行评估。在视频质量评估测试之前,我们用传统和现代的视频片段向学生们解释了滑雪元素的性能。在解决滑雪知识测试时,学生有机会观看和使用传统和/或现代视频。结果:学生在滑雪知识测试中的平均得分为8.9±2.48分(74.16±0.21%)。在评价视频的质量和贡献时,学生对传统录像方法的有用性评分平均为3.01±1.25分,对现代录像方法的有用性评分平均为3.79±1.07分。传统录像与现代录像在p < 0.01水平上差异有统计学意义。结论:所得结果表明,与传统的记录方法相比,Gopro360 max记录和呈现滑雪要素的方式对呈现质量和特定滑雪知识的获取有显著的帮助。关键词:Gopro360 max,滑雪要素,知识测试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Sportiva
Studia Sportiva Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Regional Disparities Among Teams in Selected Countries with a Focus on Age Variations Examining Diversity and Team Satisfaction: A Quantitative Analysis in Czech Urban and Rural Contexts Kiteboarding Injuries Aerobic Endurance - Finding Optimal Rowing Ergometer Settings to Match Physiological Demands of Running Analysis of University Students' Perspectives on Physical Activity and Mandatory Physical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1