We Usually Give Like This: Social Norms Describe Typical Charitable Causes Supported by Group Members

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1177/08997640231160467
C. Chapman, Lucas J Dixon, Ann Wallin, Tarli K. H. Young, B. Masser, W. Louis
{"title":"We Usually Give Like This: Social Norms Describe Typical Charitable Causes Supported by Group Members","authors":"C. Chapman, Lucas J Dixon, Ann Wallin, Tarli K. H. Young, B. Masser, W. Louis","doi":"10.1177/08997640231160467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Millions of nonprofits compete for a share of the billions of dollars donated to charity each year. Yet how donors select which charities to support remains relatively understudied. Social norms influence whether people give to charity at all, but no research has yet considered whether norms also communicate information about which causes group members typically support. To address this important question, we surveyed 1,735 people from 117 countries to understand whether they identified normative causes typically supported by their social groups. We found different normative giving profiles for men, women, older people, younger people, conservatives, progressives, religious, and nonreligious people, with varying degrees of consensus within each social group. Results demonstrate empirically—and for the first time—that social identities contain normative content about which charitable causes group members typically support. Some causes were relatively universally approved of or avoided. Results can inform nonprofit fundraising strategy around segmentation and targeting.","PeriodicalId":48235,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231160467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Millions of nonprofits compete for a share of the billions of dollars donated to charity each year. Yet how donors select which charities to support remains relatively understudied. Social norms influence whether people give to charity at all, but no research has yet considered whether norms also communicate information about which causes group members typically support. To address this important question, we surveyed 1,735 people from 117 countries to understand whether they identified normative causes typically supported by their social groups. We found different normative giving profiles for men, women, older people, younger people, conservatives, progressives, religious, and nonreligious people, with varying degrees of consensus within each social group. Results demonstrate empirically—and for the first time—that social identities contain normative content about which charitable causes group members typically support. Some causes were relatively universally approved of or avoided. Results can inform nonprofit fundraising strategy around segmentation and targeting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们通常是这样捐赠的:社会规范描述了群体成员支持的典型慈善事业
数以百万计的非营利组织在每年捐赠给慈善机构的数十亿美元中争夺份额。然而,捐助者如何选择支持哪些慈善机构仍然相对缺乏研究。社会规范会影响人们是否向慈善机构捐款,但目前还没有研究考虑规范是否也会传达群体成员通常支持的原因的信息。为了解决这个重要问题,我们调查了来自117个国家的1735人,以了解他们是否确定了通常由其社会群体支持的规范性原因。我们发现,男性、女性、老年人、年轻人、保守派、进步派、宗教人士和非宗教人士的规范性评价各不相同,每个社会群体的共识程度不同。研究结果首次从经验上证明,社会身份包含慈善事业团体成员通常支持的规范性内容。一些原因被普遍认可或避免。结果可以为非营利组织围绕细分和目标制定的筹款策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, the journal of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, is an international, interdisciplinary journal that seeks to enhance the quality of life and general welfare of humanity through effective and appropriate voluntary action by reporting on research and programs related to voluntarism, citizen participation, philanthropy, and nonprofit organizations in societies around the world.
期刊最新文献
Microfoundations of Dynamic Capabilities for Social Innovations in Small Non-Profit Organizations When a Crisis Has a Silver Lining: Social Media P2p Fundraising at the Start of COVID-19 Behind the Crowdsourcing Platform: Assessing Volunteer Recruitment and Engagement Instruments Manager Control Over Outcomes? Nature and Nurture Over Time The Role of Social Media in Nonprofit Organizations’ Fundraising
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1