Usefulness and barriers of adoption of social media for disability services: an empirical analysis

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transforming Government- People Process and Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1108/tg-06-2022-0094
Sreejith Alathur, Rajesh R. Pai
{"title":"Usefulness and barriers of adoption of social media for disability services: an empirical analysis","authors":"Sreejith Alathur, Rajesh R. Pai","doi":"10.1108/tg-06-2022-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the factors that influence the adoption of social media to meet the service needs of persons with disabilities.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study outlines the social media adoption model in disability services by using theories of persons with disabilities’ resistance, extreme-ableist expressions and exploit-ecological theories. A questionnaire survey is conducted among citizens who participate in disability-related activities.\n\n\nFindings\nThe adoption of social media is influenced by disability norms, administrative and platform support. Emerging trends, such as disability politics and inclusion, are inconsequential.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nResults implicate that frequent sharing of disability rights perspectives and awareness initiatives can enhance social media platforms for disability services.\n\n\nPractical implications\nIn regional disability services, the scope of social media is hampered by a lack of reporting capabilities and a paucity of digital content sensitive to disability.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe disability interest group reported less specialised services enabled by social media from developing nations. The current study addresses this research gap.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2022-0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the factors that influence the adoption of social media to meet the service needs of persons with disabilities. Design/methodology/approach This study outlines the social media adoption model in disability services by using theories of persons with disabilities’ resistance, extreme-ableist expressions and exploit-ecological theories. A questionnaire survey is conducted among citizens who participate in disability-related activities. Findings The adoption of social media is influenced by disability norms, administrative and platform support. Emerging trends, such as disability politics and inclusion, are inconsequential. Research limitations/implications Results implicate that frequent sharing of disability rights perspectives and awareness initiatives can enhance social media platforms for disability services. Practical implications In regional disability services, the scope of social media is hampered by a lack of reporting capabilities and a paucity of digital content sensitive to disability. Originality/value The disability interest group reported less specialised services enabled by social media from developing nations. The current study addresses this research gap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾服务采用社交媒体的有用性和障碍:实证分析
目的本研究旨在探讨影响残障人士使用社交媒体来满足服务需求的因素。本研究运用残障人士抵抗理论、极端主义表达理论和剥削生态理论,勾勒出残障服务中的社交媒体采用模式。对参加残疾相关活动的市民进行问卷调查。社交媒体的采用受到残疾规范、行政和平台支持的影响。诸如残疾政治和包容等新兴趋势是无关紧要的。研究的局限性/启示研究结果表明,经常分享残疾人权利观点和意识举措可以增强残疾人服务的社交媒体平台。在区域残疾服务中,由于缺乏报告能力和缺乏对残疾敏感的数字内容,社交媒体的范围受到了限制。独创性/价值残疾人兴趣小组报告说,发展中国家的社交媒体提供的专业服务较少。目前的研究填补了这一研究空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Flawed charts in pension fund popular reports Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services Automation in public sector jobs and services: a framework to analyze public digital transformation’s impact in a data-constrained environment Digital inclusion for all? A gender-disaggregated analysis of e-government service use in Indonesia Measuring the effects of electronic government services and corrupt practices on information exchange: a comparison of public and private hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1