Functional Knowledge versus Strategic Knowledge: What Type of Knowledge Matters Most for the Long-Term Performance of Startups

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1017/mor.2021.77
Hong Jiang, J. Murmann
{"title":"Functional Knowledge versus Strategic Knowledge: What Type of Knowledge Matters Most for the Long-Term Performance of Startups","authors":"Hong Jiang, J. Murmann","doi":"10.1017/mor.2021.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Past studies have shown that the flow of knowledge from incumbent firms is associated with the creation of startups and their subsequent performance. While much research has focused on the mechanisms of how incumbent-to-startup knowledge transfer takes place, such as entrepreneurs pursuing opportunities that their previous employers do not want to pursue, we explore with detailed qualitative analysis of six private startups in the Chinese synthetic-dye industry what type of knowledge actually flows and what type is more important for the long-term success of startups. We discover eight types of knowledge that flow from incumbents to new firms during the foundation of startups. Abstracting these eight types of knowledge into two general categories of functional knowledge and strategic knowledge, we find the reception of strategic (not functional) knowledge shapes the long-term competitiveness of surviving startups. Receiving technical knowledge – one type of functional knowledge – during the founding period is necessary for startups’ short-term survival but insufficient for long-term success. Our findings show that the performance implications of initial knowledge flows from incumbents hinge on the type of knowledge, contributing to a more explicit explanation of how incumbent-to-startup knowledge flows affect entrepreneurial performance. 摘要 现有的研究表明,从在位企业流向初创企业的知识对其创建及其后的绩效有密切关系。虽然很多研究聚焦于知识的流动机制,但很少探讨究竟有哪些知识从在位企业流向了初创企业,其中又有哪些知识对初创企业的长期成功更加重要。我们对中国合成染料行业的六家私营初创企业进行了探索性的定性分析,发现在其创建过程中,有八种知识从在位企业流入了初创企业。这八种知识又可以进一步抽象为职能知识和战略知识两大类。我们发现,对创建期后得以存活的初创企业而言,创建期内从在位企业处获取的战略知识(而不是职能知识)决定了其长期竞争力。在创建期内获取的技术知识(一种职能知识)虽然对初创企业的短期生存很有必要,但不足以支撑其长期成功。这表明,来自在位企业的初始知识流对初创企业绩效的影响事实上取决于知识的类型。本研究有助于更加清晰地解释来自在位企业的知识流如何影响初创企业的绩效。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.77","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Past studies have shown that the flow of knowledge from incumbent firms is associated with the creation of startups and their subsequent performance. While much research has focused on the mechanisms of how incumbent-to-startup knowledge transfer takes place, such as entrepreneurs pursuing opportunities that their previous employers do not want to pursue, we explore with detailed qualitative analysis of six private startups in the Chinese synthetic-dye industry what type of knowledge actually flows and what type is more important for the long-term success of startups. We discover eight types of knowledge that flow from incumbents to new firms during the foundation of startups. Abstracting these eight types of knowledge into two general categories of functional knowledge and strategic knowledge, we find the reception of strategic (not functional) knowledge shapes the long-term competitiveness of surviving startups. Receiving technical knowledge – one type of functional knowledge – during the founding period is necessary for startups’ short-term survival but insufficient for long-term success. Our findings show that the performance implications of initial knowledge flows from incumbents hinge on the type of knowledge, contributing to a more explicit explanation of how incumbent-to-startup knowledge flows affect entrepreneurial performance. 摘要 现有的研究表明,从在位企业流向初创企业的知识对其创建及其后的绩效有密切关系。虽然很多研究聚焦于知识的流动机制,但很少探讨究竟有哪些知识从在位企业流向了初创企业,其中又有哪些知识对初创企业的长期成功更加重要。我们对中国合成染料行业的六家私营初创企业进行了探索性的定性分析,发现在其创建过程中,有八种知识从在位企业流入了初创企业。这八种知识又可以进一步抽象为职能知识和战略知识两大类。我们发现,对创建期后得以存活的初创企业而言,创建期内从在位企业处获取的战略知识(而不是职能知识)决定了其长期竞争力。在创建期内获取的技术知识(一种职能知识)虽然对初创企业的短期生存很有必要,但不足以支撑其长期成功。这表明,来自在位企业的初始知识流对初创企业绩效的影响事实上取决于知识的类型。本研究有助于更加清晰地解释来自在位企业的知识流如何影响初创企业的绩效。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能知识与战略知识:什么类型的知识对初创企业的长期业绩最重要
过去的研究表明,现有企业的知识流动与初创企业的创建及其后续绩效有关。虽然许多研究都集中在现有企业到初创企业的知识转移发生的机制上,比如企业家追求他们以前的雇主不想追求的机会,但我们通过对中国合成染料行业的六家私营初创企业的详细定性分析,探讨了哪种类型的知识实际上是流动的,哪种类型对初创企业的长期成功更重要。我们发现,在初创企业建立的过程中,从现有企业流向新公司的八种知识。将这八种类型的知识抽象为功能知识和战略知识两大类,我们发现战略(非功能)知识的接受塑造了存活下来的初创公司的长期竞争力。在创业期间,获得技术知识——一种功能性知识——对于创业公司的短期生存是必要的,但对于长期成功来说是不够的。我们的研究结果表明,来自现有企业的初始知识流动对企业绩效的影响取决于知识的类型,这有助于更明确地解释现有企业到初创企业的知识流动如何影响企业绩效。摘要 现有的研究表明,从在位企业流向初创企业的知识对其创建及其后的绩效有密切关系。虽然很多研究聚焦于知识的流动机制,但很少探讨究竟有哪些知识从在位企业流向了初创企业,其中又有哪些知识对初创企业的长期成功更加重要。我们对中国合成染料行业的六家私营初创企业进行了探索性的定性分析,发现在其创建过程中,有八种知识从在位企业流入了初创企业。这八种知识又可以进一步抽象为职能知识和战略知识两大类。我们发现,对创建期后得以存活的初创企业而言,创建期内从在位企业处获取的战略知识(而不是职能知识)决定了其长期竞争力。在创建期内获取的技术知识(一种职能知识)虽然对初创企业的短期生存很有必要,但不足以支撑其长期成功。这表明,来自在位企业的初始知识流对初创企业绩效的影响事实上取决于知识的类型。本研究有助于更加清晰地解释来自在位企业的知识流如何影响初创企业的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Follow the Giver: Is Chinese MNEs’ Investment in Africa Linked to Official Aid? Local Gambling Culture and Enterprise Bribery: A Social Norms Theory Perspective Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Multiple Large Shareholders, Identity, and Corporate Tax Avoidance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1