The Myth of Shangri-La and Its Counter-discourses: (Anti-)Utopian Representations of China’s Southwest Frontier in the Twenty-First Century

IF 0.3 4区 文学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Modern Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.3366/mclc.2022.0009
Jin Hao
{"title":"The Myth of Shangri-La and Its Counter-discourses: (Anti-)Utopian Representations of China’s Southwest Frontier in the Twenty-First Century","authors":"Jin Hao","doi":"10.3366/mclc.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early twenty-first century, the southwest frontier, especially the Sino-Tibetan borderlands, has been imagined as a particular utopian space, or “Shangri-La,” in China’s popular culture, but there are also literary works and films that debunk this conception. This paper is a study of these different discourses. I argue that the utopian and anti-utopian representations of China’s Southwest in these works are socially and intellectually significant. The myth of Shangri-La promises a fantasized utopian solution to social problems and a miraculous cure for personal afflictions. In contrast, Ge Fei’s End of Spring in Jiangnan ( Chun jin Jiangnan, 2011) and Ning Ken’s Sky·Tibet ( Tian·Zang, 2010) debunk the myth of Shangri-La as a utopian solution and cure. In this way, these two novels retain their critical stance toward China’s history and reality. Meanwhile, some anti-Shangri-La works can be more ambivalent: Zhu Wen’s South of the Clouds ( Yun de nanfang, 2004) and Han Han’s The Continent ( Houhui wuqi, 2014) appear to challenge the utopian construction to form their social criticism in the beginning, only to compromise this criticism in the end as they affirm the existence of utopia either in the rural Southwest or in urban China. All these utopian and anti-utopian elements make the southwest frontier a site of contestation and contradiction.","PeriodicalId":43027,"journal":{"name":"Modern Chinese Literature and Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Chinese Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/mclc.2022.0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the early twenty-first century, the southwest frontier, especially the Sino-Tibetan borderlands, has been imagined as a particular utopian space, or “Shangri-La,” in China’s popular culture, but there are also literary works and films that debunk this conception. This paper is a study of these different discourses. I argue that the utopian and anti-utopian representations of China’s Southwest in these works are socially and intellectually significant. The myth of Shangri-La promises a fantasized utopian solution to social problems and a miraculous cure for personal afflictions. In contrast, Ge Fei’s End of Spring in Jiangnan ( Chun jin Jiangnan, 2011) and Ning Ken’s Sky·Tibet ( Tian·Zang, 2010) debunk the myth of Shangri-La as a utopian solution and cure. In this way, these two novels retain their critical stance toward China’s history and reality. Meanwhile, some anti-Shangri-La works can be more ambivalent: Zhu Wen’s South of the Clouds ( Yun de nanfang, 2004) and Han Han’s The Continent ( Houhui wuqi, 2014) appear to challenge the utopian construction to form their social criticism in the beginning, only to compromise this criticism in the end as they affirm the existence of utopia either in the rural Southwest or in urban China. All these utopian and anti-utopian elements make the southwest frontier a site of contestation and contradiction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香格里拉神话及其反话语——21世纪中国西南边疆的(反)乌托邦表征
在21世纪初,西南边疆,尤其是汉藏边疆,在中国的流行文化中被想象成一个特殊的乌托邦空间,或“香格里拉”,但也有文学作品和电影揭穿了这一概念。本文是对这些不同话语的研究。我认为,这些作品中对中国西南地区的乌托邦和反乌托邦表现具有社会和智力意义。香格里拉神话承诺为社会问题提供一个幻想中的乌托邦式解决方案,并为个人痛苦提供奇迹般的治疗。相比之下,格非的《江南春尽》(春津·江南,2011)和宁肯的《天·藏》(田·藏,2010)揭穿了香格里拉神话是乌托邦式的解决和治愈。这样,这两部小说就保留了它们对中国历史和现实的批判立场。同时,一些反香格里拉的作品可能更为矛盾:朱文的《云之南》(云德南房,2004)和韩寒的《大陆》(后会无期,2014)似乎在一开始就挑战乌托邦建构来形成他们的社会批判,但最终却在肯定乌托邦在西南农村或中国城市中的存在时妥协了这种批判。这些乌托邦和反乌托邦的因素,使西南边疆成为一个充满争拗和矛盾的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The Overbearing CEO: Cinderella Fantasy and Chinese-style Neoliberal Femininity Teahouse or Not? Meng Jinghui’s Avant-garde Version of Lao She’s Classic Play Other Worlds: A Genealogy from Lu Yao’s Capitalist Realism to Maoni’s Internet Literature Minor Literature as a Vital Component of World Literature: Lu Xun’s Translation of Bulgarian Literature via German Sources Polyphonic Poetics: Reading Yang Shaoping’s Pidgin Bamboo Branch Lyrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1