Co-constructing Professional Vision: Teacher and Researcher Learning in Co-Design

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Cognition and Instruction Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07370008.2021.2010210
Andrea S. Gomoll, C. Hmelo‐Silver, S. Šabanović
{"title":"Co-constructing Professional Vision: Teacher and Researcher Learning in Co-Design","authors":"Andrea S. Gomoll, C. Hmelo‐Silver, S. Šabanović","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2021.2010210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Prior research has highlighted that for teachers to develop robust practices, they need to develop rich professional vision (PV)—the ability to see nuanced issues of teaching and learning in situ, interpret them, and respond. In the context of problem-based learning (PBL), PV involves guiding student-centered learning and understanding when to provide just-in-time scaffolding as students navigate real-world problems. In efforts between teachers and researchers to co-design PBL experiences, design partners co-construct PV as they put forth different ways of seeing and navigate how to support student learning together. We need to better understand how (1) PV is interactionally constructed in these efforts and (2) what tools and designs support this co-construction. We use discourse analysis to explore how joint video analysis in one co-design effort supported the simultaneous development of PV for teacher and researcher. Findings revealed that collaborative video analysis of classroom interaction and student artifacts acted as boundary objects for design partners—a shared space for meaning making. On video, classroom interactions were revisited, and alternative possibilities reimagined. Group artifacts (e.g., drawings and notes) made students’ thinking available for interpretation. Consistent open-ended questions in co-design (e.g., “how are we seeing PBL in action here?”) supported the negotiation and alignment of PVs, setting shared goals, and planning actions for upcoming class periods. This research contributes to our shared understanding of how to support research and practice that is responsive to local context and is mutually beneficial for researcher and teacher.","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":"40 1","pages":"7 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Prior research has highlighted that for teachers to develop robust practices, they need to develop rich professional vision (PV)—the ability to see nuanced issues of teaching and learning in situ, interpret them, and respond. In the context of problem-based learning (PBL), PV involves guiding student-centered learning and understanding when to provide just-in-time scaffolding as students navigate real-world problems. In efforts between teachers and researchers to co-design PBL experiences, design partners co-construct PV as they put forth different ways of seeing and navigate how to support student learning together. We need to better understand how (1) PV is interactionally constructed in these efforts and (2) what tools and designs support this co-construction. We use discourse analysis to explore how joint video analysis in one co-design effort supported the simultaneous development of PV for teacher and researcher. Findings revealed that collaborative video analysis of classroom interaction and student artifacts acted as boundary objects for design partners—a shared space for meaning making. On video, classroom interactions were revisited, and alternative possibilities reimagined. Group artifacts (e.g., drawings and notes) made students’ thinking available for interpretation. Consistent open-ended questions in co-design (e.g., “how are we seeing PBL in action here?”) supported the negotiation and alignment of PVs, setting shared goals, and planning actions for upcoming class periods. This research contributes to our shared understanding of how to support research and practice that is responsive to local context and is mutually beneficial for researcher and teacher.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共建专业视野:教师与科研人员在协同设计中的学习
摘要先前的研究强调,教师要想发展强有力的实践,就需要培养丰富的专业视野(PV)——能够在现场看到教学中的细微问题,并对其进行解释和回应。在基于问题的学习(PBL)的背景下,PV涉及指导以学生为中心的学习,并理解当学生处理现实世界的问题时,何时提供及时的支架。在教师和研究人员共同设计PBL体验的努力中,设计合作伙伴共同构建PV,因为他们提出了不同的方式来看待和导航如何支持学生共同学习。我们需要更好地了解(1)PV是如何在这些努力中相互构建的,以及(2)什么工具和设计支持这种共建。我们使用话语分析来探索在一个共同设计工作中的联合视频分析如何支持教师和研究人员PV的同时发展。研究结果显示,对课堂互动和学生作品的合作视频分析是设计合作伙伴的边界对象,这是一个意义创造的共享空间。在视频中,重新审视了课堂互动,并重新构想了其他可能性。集体手工艺品(例如图纸和笔记)使学生的思维可以进行解释。共同设计中一致的开放式问题(例如,“我们如何看待PBL在这里的作用?”)支持PV的谈判和调整,设定共同目标,并为下一节课计划行动。这项研究有助于我们共同理解如何支持研究和实践,以应对当地环境,并对研究人员和教师互惠互利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
期刊最新文献
Teacher Cultivation of Classroom Statistical Modeling Practice: A Case Study Learning Inside the School, but Outside the Curriculum: An Extreme Case of Interest-Driven Learning in Alternative STEAM Learning Infrastructure for Schools The Intertwining of Children’s Interests and Micro-Practices at a Science Museum: Case Study of Three Children The Problem With Perspective: Students’ and Teachers’ Reasoning About Credibility During Discussions of Online Sources Collaborative Troubleshooting in STEM: A Case Study of High School Students Finding and Fixing Code, Circuit and Craft Challenges in Electronic Textiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1