Strategic communication of EU CSDP missions – measuring the EU's external legitimacy

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transforming Government- People Process and Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-03 DOI:10.1108/TG-11-2020-0314
A. Molnár, Lili Takács, Anna Urbanovics
{"title":"Strategic communication of EU CSDP missions – measuring the EU's external legitimacy","authors":"A. Molnár, Lili Takács, Anna Urbanovics","doi":"10.1108/TG-11-2020-0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe European Union’s (EU’s) Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) has gained increasing attention as the EU faces new threats and challenges from its surroundings. As part of its CSDP, the EU currently runs six military operations and 11 civilian missions. This paper aims to analyze the EU’s social media use of four CSDP missions and operations running in two regions: in the Mediterranean and in the Western Balkans.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper has a mixed-methods research design. A computer-assisted content analysis was conducted to extract data on the Twitter communication of the chosen missions, followed by a quantitative analysis on which elements of the EU’s strategic communication can be identified. The timeframe for investigation was set up between 1 January 2019 and 31 August 2020.\n\n\nFindings\nPatterns of communication cannot be recognized either based on regional or on the civilian-military division. The strong connectivity with the accounts of other European actors and/or institutions is striking. This study finds that the concept of local ownership can be observed only at European level, local populations of the host countries are usually not targeted. Even though several elements of the EU’s strategic communication are recurrent on the missions’ official Twitter account, Twitter communication seems to be an intra-European communication tool.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research revealed the main features of the Twitter communication of four CSDP missions. Due to the software-assisted methodology, measuring influence score was made possible, a feature that was still missing from academic literature regarding this specific area, the EU’s CSDP.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2020-0314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The European Union’s (EU’s) Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) has gained increasing attention as the EU faces new threats and challenges from its surroundings. As part of its CSDP, the EU currently runs six military operations and 11 civilian missions. This paper aims to analyze the EU’s social media use of four CSDP missions and operations running in two regions: in the Mediterranean and in the Western Balkans. Design/methodology/approach The paper has a mixed-methods research design. A computer-assisted content analysis was conducted to extract data on the Twitter communication of the chosen missions, followed by a quantitative analysis on which elements of the EU’s strategic communication can be identified. The timeframe for investigation was set up between 1 January 2019 and 31 August 2020. Findings Patterns of communication cannot be recognized either based on regional or on the civilian-military division. The strong connectivity with the accounts of other European actors and/or institutions is striking. This study finds that the concept of local ownership can be observed only at European level, local populations of the host countries are usually not targeted. Even though several elements of the EU’s strategic communication are recurrent on the missions’ official Twitter account, Twitter communication seems to be an intra-European communication tool. Originality/value The research revealed the main features of the Twitter communication of four CSDP missions. Due to the software-assisted methodology, measuring influence score was made possible, a feature that was still missing from academic literature regarding this specific area, the EU’s CSDP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟CSDP任务的战略沟通——衡量欧盟的外部合法性
目的随着欧盟面临来自其周围环境的新威胁和挑战,欧盟的共同安全与防务政策(CSDP)越来越受到关注。作为CSDP的一部分,欧盟目前有6项军事行动和11项民事任务。本文旨在分析欧盟在地中海和西巴尔干两个地区执行的四项CSDP任务和行动的社交媒体使用情况。设计/方法/方法本文采用了混合方法研究设计。进行了计算机辅助的内容分析,以提取选定特派团推特通信的数据,然后进行了定量分析,确定了欧盟战略通信的哪些要素。调查的时间安排在2019年1月1日至2020年8月31日之间。无法根据地区或军民划分来识别通信模式。与其他欧洲行为者和/或机构账户的紧密联系令人震惊。这项研究发现,地方所有权的概念只能在欧洲层面上观察到,东道国的当地人口通常不是目标。尽管欧盟战略沟通的几个要素在特派团的官方推特账户上反复出现,但推特沟通似乎是欧洲内部的沟通工具。原创性/价值研究揭示了CSDP四次任务推特交流的主要特征。由于采用了软件辅助的方法,测量影响力得分成为可能,这一特点在有关这一特定领域的学术文献中仍然缺失,即欧盟的CSDP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Flawed charts in pension fund popular reports Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services Automation in public sector jobs and services: a framework to analyze public digital transformation’s impact in a data-constrained environment Digital inclusion for all? A gender-disaggregated analysis of e-government service use in Indonesia Measuring the effects of electronic government services and corrupt practices on information exchange: a comparison of public and private hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1