Measuring the long-term effects of informal science education experiences: challenges and potential solutions.

Nancy L Staus, John H Falk, Aaron Price, Robert H Tai, Lynn D Dierking
{"title":"Measuring the long-term effects of informal science education experiences: challenges and potential solutions.","authors":"Nancy L Staus, John H Falk, Aaron Price, Robert H Tai, Lynn D Dierking","doi":"10.1186/s43031-021-00031-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the fact that most science learning takes place outside of school, little is known about how engagement in informal science learning (ISL) experiences affects learners' knowledge, skill development, interest, or identities over long periods of time. Although substantial ISL research has documented short-term outcomes such as the learning that takes place during a science center visit, research suggests that the genuine benefits of informal experiences are long-term transformations in learners as they pursue a \"cascade\" of experiences subsequent to the initial educational event. However, a number of major methodological challenges have limited longitudinal research projects investigating the long-term effects of ISL experiences. In this paper we identify and address four key issues surrounding the critical but challenging area of how to study and measure the long-term effects or impacts of ISL experiences: attribution, attrition, data collection, and analytic approaches. Our objective is to provide guidance to ISL researchers wishing to engage in long-term investigations of learner outcomes and to begin a dialogue about how best to address the numerous challenges involved in this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":72822,"journal":{"name":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8090518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00031-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the fact that most science learning takes place outside of school, little is known about how engagement in informal science learning (ISL) experiences affects learners' knowledge, skill development, interest, or identities over long periods of time. Although substantial ISL research has documented short-term outcomes such as the learning that takes place during a science center visit, research suggests that the genuine benefits of informal experiences are long-term transformations in learners as they pursue a "cascade" of experiences subsequent to the initial educational event. However, a number of major methodological challenges have limited longitudinal research projects investigating the long-term effects of ISL experiences. In this paper we identify and address four key issues surrounding the critical but challenging area of how to study and measure the long-term effects or impacts of ISL experiences: attribution, attrition, data collection, and analytic approaches. Our objective is to provide guidance to ISL researchers wishing to engage in long-term investigations of learner outcomes and to begin a dialogue about how best to address the numerous challenges involved in this work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量非正规科学教育经验的长期影响:挑战和潜在解决方案
尽管大多数科学学习都是在校外进行的,但人们对参与非正规科学学习(ISL)经历如何长期影响学习者的知识、技能发展、兴趣或身份却知之甚少。尽管大量的非正规科学学习研究已经记录了短期成果,比如在参观科学中心期间的学习,但研究表明,非正规体验的真正益处是学习者在最初的教育活动之后,通过 "串联 "体验而产生的长期转变。然而,一些重大的方法论挑战限制了调查 ISL 体验长期效果的纵向研究项目。在本文中,我们将围绕如何研究和测量 ISL 体验的长期效果或影响这一关键而又具有挑战性的领域,确定并解决四个关键问题:归因、自然减员、数据收集和分析方法。我们的目标是为希望参与学习者成果长期调查的 ISL 研究人员提供指导,并就如何最好地应对这项工作所涉及的众多挑战展开对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Transforming standards into classrooms for knowledge-in-use: an effective and coherent project-based learning system Alternative grading practices in undergraduate STEM education: a scoping review Characterization of physics and astronomy assistant professors’ reflections on their teaching: can they promote engagement in instructional change? Correction: Moving from surviving to thriving: a taxonomy of beginning science teacher challenges Are science competitions meeting their intentions? a case study on affective and cognitive predictors of success in the Physics Olympiad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1