Self-Leadership: A Paradoxical Core of Organizational Behavior

G. Stewart, S. Courtright, Charles C. Manz
{"title":"Self-Leadership: A Paradoxical Core of Organizational Behavior","authors":"G. Stewart, S. Courtright, Charles C. Manz","doi":"10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review focuses on the paradoxical concept of self-leadership—defined as a comprehensive self-influence process capturing how individuals motivate themselves to complete work that is naturally motivating or work that must be done but is not naturally motivating—as a fundamental process that challenges many traditional assumptions in organizational psychology and organizational behavior. We first present a historical review that traces the roots of self-leadership to early psychological theory and research. We next briefly summarize research related to self-leadership at both the individual and team levels of analysis. We then discuss four paradoxes associated with self-leadership: the paradox of self-leadership depletion and strengthening, the paradox of self-leadership through collaboration, the paradox of me-but-not-you self-leadership, and the paradox of needing self-leadership to improve self-leadership. We conclude with guidelines for future research and practice.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015130","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ORGPSYCH-012218-015130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

This review focuses on the paradoxical concept of self-leadership—defined as a comprehensive self-influence process capturing how individuals motivate themselves to complete work that is naturally motivating or work that must be done but is not naturally motivating—as a fundamental process that challenges many traditional assumptions in organizational psychology and organizational behavior. We first present a historical review that traces the roots of self-leadership to early psychological theory and research. We next briefly summarize research related to self-leadership at both the individual and team levels of analysis. We then discuss four paradoxes associated with self-leadership: the paradox of self-leadership depletion and strengthening, the paradox of self-leadership through collaboration, the paradox of me-but-not-you self-leadership, and the paradox of needing self-leadership to improve self-leadership. We conclude with guidelines for future research and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我领导:组织行为的矛盾核心
这篇综述的重点是自我领导的矛盾概念——定义为一个综合的自我影响过程,捕捉个人如何激励自己完成自然激励或必须完成但不是自然激励的工作——作为一个挑战组织心理学和组织行为学中许多传统假设的基本过程。我们首先提出了一个历史回顾,追溯自我领导的根源,早期的心理学理论和研究。接下来,我们简要总结了与自我领导相关的研究,包括个人和团队层面的分析。然后,我们讨论了与自我领导相关的四个悖论:自我领导的消耗和加强悖论,通过合作的自我领导悖论,我而不是你的自我领导悖论,以及需要自我领导来提高自我领导的悖论。最后,我们提出了未来研究和实践的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Launched in March 2014, the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior is a publication dedicated to reviewing the literature on I/O Psychology and HRM/OB. In the latest edition of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) in 2023, this journal achieved significant recognition. It ranked among the top 5 journals in two categories and boasted an impressive Impact Factor of 13.7.
期刊最新文献
Intensive Longitudinal Models Algorithmic Management in Organizations? From Edge Case to Center Stage On the Evolution of Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research Moral Decision-Making in Organizations How Effective Are Work-Life Balance Policies? The Importance of Inclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1