Understanding Determinents of Making Airline Entry and Exit Decisions: Application of Logit Models

Q3 Social Sciences Collegiate Aviation Review Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.22488/OKSTATE.18.101001
Canh Thi Nguyen, Cuong Thanh Nguyen
{"title":"Understanding Determinents of Making Airline Entry and Exit Decisions: Application of Logit Models","authors":"Canh Thi Nguyen, Cuong Thanh Nguyen","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.18.101001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding patterns of entry and exit decisions and determinants shaping the patterns are necessary for airline planners in drawing a robust route map and gaining their own competitive advantages.  The study used logit models to exam the relationship between two separate binary dependent variables: entry versus no-entry, exit versus no-exit, and multiple independent variables.  Dataset was extracted from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics DB1B for Quarter 1 of 2018, then was reconstructed based on original and destination (O&D) airport pairs to gain insights.  The entry decision pattern model yielded seven significant factors: total passengers, average market fare, number of carriers, distance, low-cost carriers (LCC) existence, origin hub, and destination hub.  In the meantime, the exit decision pattern model yielded all the seven aforementioned factors and two other significant factors: route type and the business model of the largest share airline.  The findings made a practical implication to airline network planners in considering determinants affecting entry and exit decisions to build a more efficient and profitable network.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.18.101001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Understanding patterns of entry and exit decisions and determinants shaping the patterns are necessary for airline planners in drawing a robust route map and gaining their own competitive advantages.  The study used logit models to exam the relationship between two separate binary dependent variables: entry versus no-entry, exit versus no-exit, and multiple independent variables.  Dataset was extracted from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics DB1B for Quarter 1 of 2018, then was reconstructed based on original and destination (O&D) airport pairs to gain insights.  The entry decision pattern model yielded seven significant factors: total passengers, average market fare, number of carriers, distance, low-cost carriers (LCC) existence, origin hub, and destination hub.  In the meantime, the exit decision pattern model yielded all the seven aforementioned factors and two other significant factors: route type and the business model of the largest share airline.  The findings made a practical implication to airline network planners in considering determinants affecting entry and exit decisions to build a more efficient and profitable network.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解航空公司出入境决策的决定因素:Logit模型的应用
了解进入和退出的决策模式和决定因素形成的模式是必要的航空公司规划者在绘制一个强大的路线图和获得自己的竞争优势。该研究使用logit模型来检验两个独立的二元因变量之间的关系:进入与不进入,退出与不退出,以及多个自变量。数据集提取自美国交通统计局(Bureau of Transportation Statistics) 2018年第一季度的DB1B数据集,然后基于原始和目的地(O&D)机场对进行重建,以获得见解。进入决策模式模型得到7个显著因素:总客运量、平均市场票价、航空公司数量、距离、低成本航空公司(LCC)存在程度、出发地枢纽和目的地枢纽。同时,退出决策模式模型得到了上述7个因素和另外两个显著因素:航线类型和最大份额航空公司的商业模式。研究结果对航空网络规划者在考虑影响进入和退出决策的决定因素以建立更高效和盈利的网络时具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Different Learning Style Inventories Report Similar Findings Among Pilots? Airspace Ownership Controversies in the United States: A Concise History A Bibliographical Analysis of Pragmatic Strategies Responding to the Pandemic Crisis in Aviation Identification, Evaluation, and Causal Factor Determination of Maintenance Errors Common to Major U.S. Certificated Air Carriers Exploring the State of SMS Implementation at Airports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1