Do Different Learning Style Inventories Report Similar Findings Among Pilots?

Q3 Social Sciences Collegiate Aviation Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22488/okstate.23.100235
Kurt Reesman, James Birdsong
{"title":"Do Different Learning Style Inventories Report Similar Findings Among Pilots?","authors":"Kurt Reesman, James Birdsong","doi":"10.22488/okstate.23.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the gender and generational learning preferences of pilots and non-pilots and the gender and generational differences among the pilots surveyed. The Felder and Soloman Index of Learning Styles questionnaire measured individual learning styles on four continuums: Active-Reflective, Sensing-Intuitive, Visual-Verbal, and Sequential-Global. Survey data indicate a statistically significant difference in learning styles of non-pilots and pilots, males and females, and different generations of pilots. Among all participants, pilots scored higher than non-pilots on the Sensing and Visual scales, and males scored higher on the Visual aspect of that scale. Generation variation occurred between Generation X and Y, where Generation Y favored the Sensing learning style more than Generation X. Among pilots, males scored higher than females on the Visual preference, and Generation Y and Z preferred the Sensing learning style. Generation Z favored the Sequential learning style more than Generation X. Curriculum design, instructional methodologies, and technologies selected to deliver course content should focus on active, sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles while balancing the other styles in the design to produce learners who can thrive in any educational setting.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.23.100235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the gender and generational learning preferences of pilots and non-pilots and the gender and generational differences among the pilots surveyed. The Felder and Soloman Index of Learning Styles questionnaire measured individual learning styles on four continuums: Active-Reflective, Sensing-Intuitive, Visual-Verbal, and Sequential-Global. Survey data indicate a statistically significant difference in learning styles of non-pilots and pilots, males and females, and different generations of pilots. Among all participants, pilots scored higher than non-pilots on the Sensing and Visual scales, and males scored higher on the Visual aspect of that scale. Generation variation occurred between Generation X and Y, where Generation Y favored the Sensing learning style more than Generation X. Among pilots, males scored higher than females on the Visual preference, and Generation Y and Z preferred the Sensing learning style. Generation Z favored the Sequential learning style more than Generation X. Curriculum design, instructional methodologies, and technologies selected to deliver course content should focus on active, sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles while balancing the other styles in the design to produce learners who can thrive in any educational setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的学习风格量表在飞行员中报告相似的结果吗?
本研究考察了飞行员和非飞行员的学习偏好的性别和代际差异,以及被调查飞行员的性别和代际差异。费尔德和所罗门学习风格指数调查问卷在四个连续体上测量了个人的学习风格:主动反思、感觉直觉、视觉语言和顺序全局。调查数据显示,非飞行员和飞行员、男性和女性以及不同世代的飞行员在学习风格上存在统计学上的显著差异。在所有参与者中,飞行员在感觉和视觉方面的得分高于非飞行员,男性在视觉方面的得分更高。X一代和Y一代之间存在代际差异,其中Y一代比X一代更喜欢感知学习风格。在飞行员中,男性在视觉偏好上的得分高于女性,Y一代和Z一代更喜欢感知学习风格。Z一代比x一代更喜欢顺序学习风格。课程设计、教学方法和技术选择来传递课程内容应该关注主动、感知、视觉和顺序学习风格,同时平衡设计中的其他风格,以培养能够在任何教育环境中茁壮成长的学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Different Learning Style Inventories Report Similar Findings Among Pilots? Airspace Ownership Controversies in the United States: A Concise History A Bibliographical Analysis of Pragmatic Strategies Responding to the Pandemic Crisis in Aviation Identification, Evaluation, and Causal Factor Determination of Maintenance Errors Common to Major U.S. Certificated Air Carriers Exploring the State of SMS Implementation at Airports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1