Grammatical gender in L2 Swedish in Finnish-speaking immersion students: A comparison with non-immersion students

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Nordic Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2021-02-24 DOI:10.1017/S0332586520000256
Eeva-Liisa Nyqvist, Sinikka Lahtinen
{"title":"Grammatical gender in L2 Swedish in Finnish-speaking immersion students: A comparison with non-immersion students","authors":"Eeva-Liisa Nyqvist, Sinikka Lahtinen","doi":"10.1017/S0332586520000256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Swedish grammatical gender is challenging for Finnish-speaking learners of Swedish due to its abstract meaning, the complex nature of Swedish NPs and the low salience of the morphology used to mark gender. Our study compares the expression of gender in texts written in Swedish by Finnish-speaking 12- and 15-year-old immersion students with that of 16-year-old non-immersion students. The results show that NPs with gender agreement, i.e. those with several morphemes marking gender, are more difficult than NPs with only one marker. In all informant groups, uter is significantly easier than neuter, but uter is also overused, as approximately 75% of all Swedish nouns are uter in modern Swedish. Comparisons between different informant groups show that non-immersion students often reach a significantly higher level of accuracy than immersion students, which indicates that formal teaching has a positive effect.","PeriodicalId":43203,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Linguistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"281 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0332586520000256","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586520000256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Swedish grammatical gender is challenging for Finnish-speaking learners of Swedish due to its abstract meaning, the complex nature of Swedish NPs and the low salience of the morphology used to mark gender. Our study compares the expression of gender in texts written in Swedish by Finnish-speaking 12- and 15-year-old immersion students with that of 16-year-old non-immersion students. The results show that NPs with gender agreement, i.e. those with several morphemes marking gender, are more difficult than NPs with only one marker. In all informant groups, uter is significantly easier than neuter, but uter is also overused, as approximately 75% of all Swedish nouns are uter in modern Swedish. Comparisons between different informant groups show that non-immersion students often reach a significantly higher level of accuracy than immersion students, which indicates that formal teaching has a positive effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰语浸入式学生与非浸入式学生在第二语言瑞典语中的语法性别比较
瑞典语的语法性别对讲芬兰语的瑞典语学习者来说是一个挑战,因为它的意义抽象,瑞典语np的复杂性以及用于标记性别的形态学的不显著性。我们的研究比较了12岁和15岁的芬兰语浸入式学生与16岁的非浸入式学生在瑞典语文本中的性别表达。结果表明,具有多个词素标记性别的np比只有一个词素标记性别的np更难识别。在所有的信息组中,ter明显比中性更容易使用,但ter也被过度使用,因为在现代瑞典语中,大约75%的瑞典名词都是outer。不同信息者群体之间的比较表明,非浸入式学生往往达到显著高于浸入式学生的准确性水平,这表明正式教学具有积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Strong Finals: A prosodic feature projecting ‘more to come’ in a Danish urban dialect Argument structure constructions in competition: The Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat alternation in Icelandic The Gutnish si-passive Enhanced coarticulatory labialization of /ts/ in Argentine Danish Building languages: Estonian–English two-year-old bilingual’s reliance on patterns in code-mixed utterances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1