Spoiled History: Leprosy and the Lessons of Queer Medieval Historiography

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1215/01903659-10472443
S. Adler
{"title":"Spoiled History: Leprosy and the Lessons of Queer Medieval Historiography","authors":"S. Adler","doi":"10.1215/01903659-10472443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n White supremacists fetishize the crusading knight; queer theorists claim an identification with the generative secret of the premodern sodomite. This essay attends to the epistemological circuits of transhistorical identification, examining the claims of recursive history and the theories of attachment betrayed by identification with the medieval past. Turning away from the solicitations of the crusader and the sodomite, the essay excavates histories of emotional attachment to the leper, a medieval figure whose status as abject incarnation of historical distance helps reconfigure transhistoric emotional identification. In medieval texts, the leper's ruined face scripts styles of recognition. In the medical writings of nineteenth-century imperial physicians, the medieval leper is used in negotiating fears of disease outbreaks in various colonies. The leper therefore comes to assume the status of reassuring historical distance as a result of imperial ideological needs. Attention to the circuits of desire that animate claims to the past on the basis of identification and personal attachment can account for the attraction the Middle Ages exerts on both medievalists and white supremacists.","PeriodicalId":46332,"journal":{"name":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-10472443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

White supremacists fetishize the crusading knight; queer theorists claim an identification with the generative secret of the premodern sodomite. This essay attends to the epistemological circuits of transhistorical identification, examining the claims of recursive history and the theories of attachment betrayed by identification with the medieval past. Turning away from the solicitations of the crusader and the sodomite, the essay excavates histories of emotional attachment to the leper, a medieval figure whose status as abject incarnation of historical distance helps reconfigure transhistoric emotional identification. In medieval texts, the leper's ruined face scripts styles of recognition. In the medical writings of nineteenth-century imperial physicians, the medieval leper is used in negotiating fears of disease outbreaks in various colonies. The leper therefore comes to assume the status of reassuring historical distance as a result of imperial ideological needs. Attention to the circuits of desire that animate claims to the past on the basis of identification and personal attachment can account for the attraction the Middle Ages exerts on both medievalists and white supremacists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被破坏的历史:麻风病和奇怪的中世纪史学的教训
白人至上主义者崇拜十字军骑士;酷儿理论家声称认同前现代鸡奸者的生殖秘密。本文关注超历史认同的认识论回路,考察递归历史的主张和与中世纪过去认同所背叛的依恋理论。这篇文章从十字军和鸡奸者的恳求转向挖掘对麻风病人情感依恋的历史,麻风病人是一个中世纪的人物,他作为历史距离的卑微化身,帮助重新配置了超历史的情感认同。在中世纪的文献中,麻风病人被毁的脸代表了识别的风格。在19世纪帝国医生的医学著作中,中世纪的麻风病人被用来在各个殖民地协商对疾病爆发的恐惧。因此,由于帝国意识形态的需要,麻疯病人开始承担起确保历史距离的地位。对欲望回路的关注,在认同和个人依恋的基础上激发了对过去的主张,可以解释中世纪对中世纪主义者和白人至上主义者的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Extending beyond the postmodern, boundary 2, an international journal of literature and culture, approaches problems in these areas from a number of politically, historically, and theoretically informed perspectives. boundary 2 remains committed to understanding the present and approaching the study of national and international culture and politics through literature and the human sciences.
期刊最新文献
Spoiled History: Leprosy and the Lessons of Queer Medieval Historiography A Bridge Too Far? Ludovico Marracci's Translation of the Qurʾan and the Persistence of Medieval Biblicism Race, Medieval Studies, and Disciplinary Boundaries Belle da Costa Greene and the Undoing of “Medieval” Studies Making Islam (Coherent): Academic Discourse and the Politics of Language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1