Impotenza, fuga e controidilllio: Schwiebus di Arno Lubos

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Caietele Echinox Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.24193/cechinox.2023.44.17
A. Fambrini
{"title":"Impotenza, fuga e controidilllio: Schwiebus di Arno Lubos","authors":"A. Fambrini","doi":"10.24193/cechinox.2023.44.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"In the nineties, a debate on the “impossible” hypothesis of a victory for the Third Reich in the Second World War and what would happen after it ran through German historiography. According to this interpretation, National Socialism would have been an extreme and unrepeatable phenomenon. After its definitive affirmation, a process of progressive moderation would have started. “If Hitler had won, National Socialism would be stifled in its radicalism, or it would have become bourgeois,” writes Alexander Demandt in Wenn Hitler gewonnen hätte (1995). Arne Lubos’ novel Schwiebus (1980) anticipates this debate by a decade and develops the motif of “Nazism after Nazism” in an all-historical key. It denies “normalizing” perspectives and outlines scenarios in which National Socialist hegemony has given rise to a regime in which repression and terror are not entirely evident but no less widespread and frightening. Our paper aims to explain its narrative strategies.\"","PeriodicalId":40223,"journal":{"name":"Caietele Echinox","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caietele Echinox","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/cechinox.2023.44.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"In the nineties, a debate on the “impossible” hypothesis of a victory for the Third Reich in the Second World War and what would happen after it ran through German historiography. According to this interpretation, National Socialism would have been an extreme and unrepeatable phenomenon. After its definitive affirmation, a process of progressive moderation would have started. “If Hitler had won, National Socialism would be stifled in its radicalism, or it would have become bourgeois,” writes Alexander Demandt in Wenn Hitler gewonnen hätte (1995). Arne Lubos’ novel Schwiebus (1980) anticipates this debate by a decade and develops the motif of “Nazism after Nazism” in an all-historical key. It denies “normalizing” perspectives and outlines scenarios in which National Socialist hegemony has given rise to a regime in which repression and terror are not entirely evident but no less widespread and frightening. Our paper aims to explain its narrative strategies."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arno Lubos的Schwiebus
上世纪90年代,一场关于第三帝国在第二次世界大战中获胜的“不可能”假设以及战后会发生什么的辩论贯穿了德国的史学。根据这种解释,国家社会主义将是一种极端的、不可重复的现象。在它得到明确肯定之后,一个渐进的温和进程就会开始。“如果希特勒赢了,国家社会主义的激进主义就会被扼杀,或者它就会变成资产阶级,”亚历山大·德曼特(Alexander Demandt)在《希特勒执政hätte》(1995)中写道。Arne Lubos的小说《Schwiebus》(1980)将这场争论提前了十年,并以全历史的基调发展了“一个又一个纳粹主义”的主题。它否认“正常化”的观点,并概述了国家社会主义霸权产生的政权的情景,在这个政权中,镇压和恐怖并不完全明显,但同样普遍和令人恐惧。本文旨在解释其叙事策略。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Caietele Echinox
Caietele Echinox HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Memoria storica, memoria letteraria e critica del presente nel Doktor Hoechst di Robert Menasse Impotenza, fuga e controidilllio: Schwiebus di Arno Lubos Cenotaph and Tumulus – Ethics and Memory. The Micronovel Dora Bruder by Patrick Modiano and the Fiction of Herta Müller Tracce e corpi dal passato: uno sguardo al teatro della memoria spagnolo attuale (dal 2000 in poi) La Vita di Antonij il Romano: (ri-)creazione della memoria, (ri-)costruzione di un’identità
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1