Growth theories: The realities of the last decades (Issues of sociocultural codes — to the expansion of the research program)

IF 0.5 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-18-42
L. Grigoryev, M.-Y. Y. Maykhrovitch
{"title":"Growth theories: The realities of the last decades (Issues of sociocultural codes — to the expansion of the research program)","authors":"L. Grigoryev, M.-Y. Y. Maykhrovitch","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-18-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is aimed at examining institutional approaches to the theories of economic growth, and touches upon especially the influence of sociocultural codes on the development of the world economy. The presented study compares the rates of economic growth, taking into account various classifications of count- ries according to Angus Maddison, Ronald Inglehart, and the cluster approach. One of the main results is a proposal to move from the dichotomy and study of “advanced—emerging states” over long time periods, used in Maddison’s research, to the study of subgroups of countries, including cluster analysis, over a more compact period — 1992—2019. With the help of clustering, it was concluded that the group of the most developed countries retains an advantage in the level of development but does not demonstrate growth rates higher than the “catching up” groups. Thus, the convergence of levels of development does not actually occur. The article also illustrates that a disaggregated analysis of growth by clusters creates interesting opportunities for a further development of the research program.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-18-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article is aimed at examining institutional approaches to the theories of economic growth, and touches upon especially the influence of sociocultural codes on the development of the world economy. The presented study compares the rates of economic growth, taking into account various classifications of count- ries according to Angus Maddison, Ronald Inglehart, and the cluster approach. One of the main results is a proposal to move from the dichotomy and study of “advanced—emerging states” over long time periods, used in Maddison’s research, to the study of subgroups of countries, including cluster analysis, over a more compact period — 1992—2019. With the help of clustering, it was concluded that the group of the most developed countries retains an advantage in the level of development but does not demonstrate growth rates higher than the “catching up” groups. Thus, the convergence of levels of development does not actually occur. The article also illustrates that a disaggregated analysis of growth by clusters creates interesting opportunities for a further development of the research program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成长理论:过去几十年的现实(社会文化密码问题——研究项目的扩展)
本文旨在考察经济增长理论的制度方法,特别是社会文化规范对世界经济发展的影响。本研究比较了经济增长率,根据Angus Maddison、Ronald Inglehart和聚类方法,考虑了各种计数分类。主要结果之一是,建议从麦迪森研究中使用的长期“先进-新兴国家”的二分法和研究,转向在1992年至2019年这一更紧凑的时期内研究国家亚组,包括聚类分析。在集群的帮助下,得出的结论是,最发达国家集团在发展水平上保持优势,但增长率并不高于“追赶”集团。因此,发展水平的趋同实际上并没有发生。文章还说明,按集群对增长的分类分析为研究计划的进一步发展创造了有趣的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Determinants of public spending composition in the Russian regions Soaring public debt: Return of financial repression and high inflation? Knowledge-based view of the firm and the phenomenon of knowledge encapsulation Economic education as a mirror of interdisciplinary discourse Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1