Source-to-sink efficiency of blue and green district heating and hydrogen-based heat supply systems

IF 5.4 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Smart Energy Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.segy.2022.100071
Oddgeir Gudmundsson, Jan Eric Thorsen
{"title":"Source-to-sink efficiency of blue and green district heating and hydrogen-based heat supply systems","authors":"Oddgeir Gudmundsson,&nbsp;Jan Eric Thorsen","doi":"10.1016/j.segy.2022.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hydrogen is commonly mentioned as a future proof energy carrier. Hydrogen supporters advocate for repurposing existing natural gas grids for a sustainable hydrogen supply. While the long-term vision of the hydrogen community is green hydrogen the community acknowledges that in the short term it will be to large extent manufactured from natural gas, but in a decarbonized way, giving it the name blue hydrogen. While hydrogen has a role to play in hard to decarbonize sectors its role for building heating demands is doubtful, as mature and more energy efficient alternatives exist. As building heat supply infrastructures built today will operate for the decades to come it is of highest importance to ensure that the most efficient and sustainable infrastructures are chosen. This paper compares the source to sink efficiencies of hydrogen-based heat supply system to a district heating system operating on the same primary energy source. The results show that a natural gas-based district heating could be 267% more efficient, and consequently have significantly lower global warming potential, than a blue hydrogen-based heat supply A renewable power-based district heating could achieve above 440% higher efficiency than green hydrogen-based heat supply system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34738,"journal":{"name":"Smart Energy","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955222000090/pdfft?md5=6a7996e751aa788187cf618491842001&pid=1-s2.0-S2666955222000090-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955222000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Hydrogen is commonly mentioned as a future proof energy carrier. Hydrogen supporters advocate for repurposing existing natural gas grids for a sustainable hydrogen supply. While the long-term vision of the hydrogen community is green hydrogen the community acknowledges that in the short term it will be to large extent manufactured from natural gas, but in a decarbonized way, giving it the name blue hydrogen. While hydrogen has a role to play in hard to decarbonize sectors its role for building heating demands is doubtful, as mature and more energy efficient alternatives exist. As building heat supply infrastructures built today will operate for the decades to come it is of highest importance to ensure that the most efficient and sustainable infrastructures are chosen. This paper compares the source to sink efficiencies of hydrogen-based heat supply system to a district heating system operating on the same primary energy source. The results show that a natural gas-based district heating could be 267% more efficient, and consequently have significantly lower global warming potential, than a blue hydrogen-based heat supply A renewable power-based district heating could achieve above 440% higher efficiency than green hydrogen-based heat supply system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蓝色和绿色区域供热和氢基供热系统的源到汇效率
氢通常被认为是未来的能源载体。氢的支持者主张重新利用现有的天然气电网,以实现可持续的氢供应。虽然氢社区的长期愿景是绿色氢,但社区承认,在短期内,它将在很大程度上由天然气制造,但以脱碳的方式,因此被称为蓝色氢。虽然氢在难以脱碳的行业中发挥作用,但在建筑供暖需求方面的作用值得怀疑,因为存在成熟和更节能的替代品。由于今天建造的供热基础设施将在未来几十年内运行,因此确保选择最高效和可持续的基础设施至关重要。本文将氢基供热系统的源汇效率与使用相同一次能源的区域供热系统进行了比较。结果表明,与蓝色氢基供热相比,天然气供热效率可提高267%,全球变暖潜势显著降低;可再生能源供热效率可比绿色氢基供热系统提高440%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Energy
Smart Energy Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
73 days
期刊最新文献
Predictive building energy management with user feedback in the loop Optimal energy management in smart energy systems: A deep reinforcement learning approach and a digital twin case-study Economic viability of decentralised battery storage systems for single-family buildings up to cross-building utilisation The impact of offshore energy hub and hydrogen integration on the Faroe Island’s energy system The cost of CO2 emissions abatement in a micro energy community in a Belgian context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1