Putting Value on Extracellular Vesicles

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Science and Technology Studies Pub Date : 2021-11-04 DOI:10.23987/sts.107750
Ilpo Helén, Heta Tarkkala
{"title":"Putting Value on Extracellular Vesicles","authors":"Ilpo Helén, Heta Tarkkala","doi":"10.23987/sts.107750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies over the years have paid attention to the entanglement of biomedical research and the multiplicity of expectations for scientific breakthroughs and economic gains. However, science and economy are by no means the only values attributed to the biomedical endeavour in an actual R&D project. In this article, we present an analysis of a case we studied in Finland, in which academic and commercial partners jointly studied minuscule extracellular vesicles (EVs) to develop related technologies and explore their commercialisation potential. Thus, we ask, what is the spectrum of value in biomedical R&D? Our analysis highlights that in the rapidly developing, but still immature, scientific field of EVs, the dominant value of the research project are related to the expansion of future possibilities (e.g., funding and collaborations) and the sustainability of research. The subject of our study is a new domain of biomedicine that is quite unexplored in science and technology studies (STS), and our findings contribute to ongoing discussions on valuation and economies related to biomedical R&D. We focus on the multiplicity of value, and, by doing this, critically discuss the mainstream view emphasising the dominance of commercial value.","PeriodicalId":45119,"journal":{"name":"Science and Technology Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.107750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies over the years have paid attention to the entanglement of biomedical research and the multiplicity of expectations for scientific breakthroughs and economic gains. However, science and economy are by no means the only values attributed to the biomedical endeavour in an actual R&D project. In this article, we present an analysis of a case we studied in Finland, in which academic and commercial partners jointly studied minuscule extracellular vesicles (EVs) to develop related technologies and explore their commercialisation potential. Thus, we ask, what is the spectrum of value in biomedical R&D? Our analysis highlights that in the rapidly developing, but still immature, scientific field of EVs, the dominant value of the research project are related to the expansion of future possibilities (e.g., funding and collaborations) and the sustainability of research. The subject of our study is a new domain of biomedicine that is quite unexplored in science and technology studies (STS), and our findings contribute to ongoing discussions on valuation and economies related to biomedical R&D. We focus on the multiplicity of value, and, by doing this, critically discuss the mainstream view emphasising the dominance of commercial value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重视细胞外囊泡
多年来的一些研究关注了生物医学研究的纠缠以及对科学突破和经济收益的多重期望。然而,在实际的研发项目中,科学和经济绝不是生物医学努力的唯一价值。在这篇文章中,我们分析了我们在芬兰研究的一个案例,在这个案例中,学术和商业合作伙伴共同研究了微小的细胞外囊泡(ev),以开发相关技术并探索其商业化潜力。因此,我们要问,生物医学研发的价值范围是什么?我们的分析强调,在快速发展但仍不成熟的电动汽车科学领域,研究项目的主要价值与未来可能性的扩大(如资金和合作)和研究的可持续性有关。我们的研究主题是生物医学的一个新领域,在科学和技术研究(STS)中尚未被探索,我们的研究结果有助于正在进行的关于生物医学研发的估值和经济的讨论。我们关注价值的多样性,并通过这样做,批判性地讨论强调商业价值主导地位的主流观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science and Technology Studies
Science and Technology Studies HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Facilitating the Movement of Knowledge in Occupational Health Services Elliott Anthony (2023) Algorithmic Intimacy. The Digital Revolution in Personal Relationships West Darrel M and Allen John R (2020) Turning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence “Should We Stay or Should We Go now?” Knox Hannah (2020) Thinking Like a Climate: Governing a City in Times of Environmental Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1