Trauma and Counter-Trauma in the Book of Esther: Reading the Megillah in the Face of the Post-Shoah Sabra

Sarah Emanuel
{"title":"Trauma and Counter-Trauma in the Book of Esther: Reading the Megillah in the Face of the Post-Shoah Sabra","authors":"Sarah Emanuel","doi":"10.2104/BCT.V13I1.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociologist Kai Erikson defines collective trauma as a \"blow\" to one’s collective identity and \"social life.\" He writes, “It is a form of shock...a gradual realization that the community no longer exists as an effective source of support and that an important part of the self has disappeared.” We catch glimpses of a culture’s memories of trauma and survival of them in an array of discursive formations, including narrative. By naming, shaping, and giving words to traumatic experience, storytelling becomes an act of processing—an act that seeks to make sense of and survive the many haunting associations and dissociations that, paradoxically, signify events that exceed categorized signification. Though typically not utilizing trauma theory, scholars indirectly describe the book of Esther as taking part in this process. As Timothy Beal writes, Esther is a book “about living beyond the end,” often doing so by utilizing humor to lampoon the powers that be. However, rather than simply undermine the enemy via subversive jest, the Jews eventually turn the tables completely as they call for a mass annihilation of Jewish foes. As such, the creation of a new Jewish identity—one that appropriates Amalekite power and force—becomes another glimpse of the culture’s attempt to process, survive, and counter trauma. These tactics become even clearer, however, when cross-read intertextually with the celebration of Purim throughout the Shoah followed by the construction of the Israeli Sabra and IDF culture post-WWII. Whereas the celebration of Purim functioned more regularly as hidden resistance, the establishment of the Israeli sabra created space for both revenge fantasy and revenge reality against any and all lingering “Amaleks.” Though differing in strategy, context, and, arguably, productivity, these responses nevertheless illustrate a range of survival strategies employed in the face of communal suffering. Reading the book of Esther alongside these examples of counter trauma exposes Esther’s use of humor and appropriation of enemy ideology as articulations of post-traumatic wish-fulfillment. In short, by reading Esther as haunted by the Holocaust and the creation of the post-Shoah Sabra, we may better recognize the range of survival tactics employed in the text.","PeriodicalId":53382,"journal":{"name":"The Bible and Critical Theory","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bible and Critical Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2104/BCT.V13I1.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Sociologist Kai Erikson defines collective trauma as a "blow" to one’s collective identity and "social life." He writes, “It is a form of shock...a gradual realization that the community no longer exists as an effective source of support and that an important part of the self has disappeared.” We catch glimpses of a culture’s memories of trauma and survival of them in an array of discursive formations, including narrative. By naming, shaping, and giving words to traumatic experience, storytelling becomes an act of processing—an act that seeks to make sense of and survive the many haunting associations and dissociations that, paradoxically, signify events that exceed categorized signification. Though typically not utilizing trauma theory, scholars indirectly describe the book of Esther as taking part in this process. As Timothy Beal writes, Esther is a book “about living beyond the end,” often doing so by utilizing humor to lampoon the powers that be. However, rather than simply undermine the enemy via subversive jest, the Jews eventually turn the tables completely as they call for a mass annihilation of Jewish foes. As such, the creation of a new Jewish identity—one that appropriates Amalekite power and force—becomes another glimpse of the culture’s attempt to process, survive, and counter trauma. These tactics become even clearer, however, when cross-read intertextually with the celebration of Purim throughout the Shoah followed by the construction of the Israeli Sabra and IDF culture post-WWII. Whereas the celebration of Purim functioned more regularly as hidden resistance, the establishment of the Israeli sabra created space for both revenge fantasy and revenge reality against any and all lingering “Amaleks.” Though differing in strategy, context, and, arguably, productivity, these responses nevertheless illustrate a range of survival strategies employed in the face of communal suffering. Reading the book of Esther alongside these examples of counter trauma exposes Esther’s use of humor and appropriation of enemy ideology as articulations of post-traumatic wish-fulfillment. In short, by reading Esther as haunted by the Holocaust and the creation of the post-Shoah Sabra, we may better recognize the range of survival tactics employed in the text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《以斯帖记》中的创伤与反创伤:面对大屠杀后的Sabra解读《弥吉拉》
社会学家凯·埃里克森将集体创伤定义为对一个人的集体身份和“社会生活”的“打击”。他写道:“这是一种震惊……逐渐意识到社区不再是一个有效的支持来源,自我的一个重要部分已经消失了。”我们瞥见了一种文化对创伤的记忆,并在一系列话语形式中幸存下来,包括叙事。通过命名、塑造和描述创伤经历,讲故事变成了一种处理的行为——一种寻求理解并幸存下来的行为,这种行为是一种令人难以忘怀的联想和分离,矛盾的是,这些联想和分离表明了超出分类意义的事件。虽然通常不使用创伤理论,但学者们间接地将以斯帖记描述为参与了这一过程。正如蒂莫西·比尔(Timothy Beal)所写的,《以斯帖》(Esther)是一本“关于超越末日的生活”的书,经常用幽默来讽刺当权者。然而,犹太人并不是简单地通过颠覆性的玩笑来削弱敌人,而是最终完全扭转了局面,他们呼吁大规模消灭犹太敌人。因此,创造一种新的犹太人身份——一种利用亚玛力人的权力和力量的身份——成为该文化试图处理、生存和对抗创伤的另一个缩影。然而,当交叉阅读整个大屠杀期间的普珥节庆祝活动,以及二战后以色列Sabra和IDF文化的建设时,这些策略变得更加清晰。尽管普珥节的庆祝活动更多地是作为一种隐藏的抵抗,但以色列军刀的建立为报复幻想和报复现实创造了空间,打击所有挥之不去的“亚玛力人”。尽管在策略、背景和生产力方面有所不同,但这些反应说明了面对共同苦难时采用的一系列生存策略。把《以斯帖记》和这些反创伤的例子一起读,就会发现以斯帖用幽默和对敌人意识形态的利用来表达创伤后的愿望实现。简而言之,通过将《以斯帖记》解读为被大屠杀和后大屠杀时代的创造所困扰,我们可以更好地认识到文本中使用的生存策略的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 farm outbreaks in Ontario, January-December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2 both show similarly reduced disease severity of COVID-19 compared to Delta, Germany, 2021 to 2022. The Israelites Tell Their Story: PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION The Disputed Pauline Letters:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1