Factors related to differences in digitally measured student perceptions of teaching quality

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Effectiveness and School Improvement Pub Date : 2022-01-26 DOI:10.1080/09243453.2021.2023584
Hannah J. E. Bijlsma, C. Glas, A. Visscher
{"title":"Factors related to differences in digitally measured student perceptions of teaching quality","authors":"Hannah J. E. Bijlsma, C. Glas, A. Visscher","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2021.2023584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Modern digital technologies enable the efficient collection and processing of student perceptions of teaching quality. However, students’ ratings could be confounded by student, teacher, and classroom characteristics. We investigated students’ ratings of 26 teachers who used the digital tool Impact! in their mathematics lessons with 14- and 15-year-old students (n = 717). A Bayesian item response theory (IRT)-model approach was used to model potential associations. High-performing students on average rated their teacher higher than low- and middle-performing students. More likeable and more experienced teachers received higher ratings from their students, and the higher the class’s average math grade, the higher the students rated their teachers. Other variables investigated in this study (e.g., student and teacher gender, class size) were not associated with student perceptions of teaching quality. Both related and unrelated factors are discussed. Some implications of the findings for practice, limitations of the study, and suggestions for further research are presented.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":"33 1","pages":"360 - 380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.2023584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Modern digital technologies enable the efficient collection and processing of student perceptions of teaching quality. However, students’ ratings could be confounded by student, teacher, and classroom characteristics. We investigated students’ ratings of 26 teachers who used the digital tool Impact! in their mathematics lessons with 14- and 15-year-old students (n = 717). A Bayesian item response theory (IRT)-model approach was used to model potential associations. High-performing students on average rated their teacher higher than low- and middle-performing students. More likeable and more experienced teachers received higher ratings from their students, and the higher the class’s average math grade, the higher the students rated their teachers. Other variables investigated in this study (e.g., student and teacher gender, class size) were not associated with student perceptions of teaching quality. Both related and unrelated factors are discussed. Some implications of the findings for practice, limitations of the study, and suggestions for further research are presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与数字测量学生对教学质量感知差异相关的因素
摘要现代数字技术能够有效地收集和处理学生对教学质量的看法。然而,学生的评分可能会因学生、教师和课堂特征而混淆。我们调查了26名使用数字工具Impact!在14岁和15岁学生的数学课上(n = 717)。使用贝叶斯项目反应理论(IRT)模型方法对潜在关联进行建模。表现优异的学生平均对老师的评价高于表现较差和中等的学生。更讨人喜欢、更有经验的老师从学生那里得到的评价更高,班级的平均数学成绩越高,学生对老师的评价就越高。本研究中调查的其他变量(如学生和教师性别、班级规模)与学生对教学质量的看法无关。讨论了相关因素和不相关因素。提出了研究结果对实践的一些启示、研究的局限性以及对进一步研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
School Effectiveness and School Improvement EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: School Effectiveness and School Improvement presents information on educational effectiveness, practice and policy-making across primary, secondary and higher education. The Editors believe that the educational progress of all students, regardless of family background and economic status, is the key indicator of effectiveness and improvement in schools. The journal strives to explore this idea with manuscripts that cover a range of subjects within the area of educational effectiveness at the classroom, school or system level, including, but not limited to: •Effective pedagogy •Classroom climate •School ethos and leadership •School improvement and reform programmes •Systemwide policy and reform
期刊最新文献
Advancing the field of educational effectiveness and equity School leadership and students’ decisions about further education: exploring the roles of goal setting and school socioeconomic composition Against the odds: predictors of academic success and excellence in majority-minority schools Effects of the comprehensive school reform program Success for All on students’ reading skills in Dutch schools High-quality teachers in low-quality schools: understanding the variation in teaching quality in low-achieving Chilean schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1