Escritos médico-psicopedagógicos sobre a criança: os projetos de caderneta individual no século XX

IF 4.1 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Society Pub Date : 2021-01-29 DOI:10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E79142
Samuel Boussion
{"title":"Escritos médico-psicopedagógicos sobre a criança: os projetos de caderneta individual no século XX","authors":"Samuel Boussion","doi":"10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E79142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the projects of individual medical-pedagogical notebooks for children and their evolution. In the course of the twentieth century, numerous attempts were made to introduce a health record that would also take account of psychological and pedagogical data. They were initially aimed at school hygiene, but they were also deployed in the field of prophylaxis, in order to detect “abnormal” children, and later in the field of vocational guidance. The Second World War also produced a different approach, in terms of rationalizing the child’s health and psychological writings, seeking to take into account the events and what they may have caused in the child, without abandoning the old categories, linked to the biological. No doubt the novelties are to be found more in what we intend to entrust the medical and educational notebook to the children, but this parenthesis will soon be closed and finally fade away in the face of criticism of what is then considered to be social control.","PeriodicalId":47847,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E79142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article focuses on the projects of individual medical-pedagogical notebooks for children and their evolution. In the course of the twentieth century, numerous attempts were made to introduce a health record that would also take account of psychological and pedagogical data. They were initially aimed at school hygiene, but they were also deployed in the field of prophylaxis, in order to detect “abnormal” children, and later in the field of vocational guidance. The Second World War also produced a different approach, in terms of rationalizing the child’s health and psychological writings, seeking to take into account the events and what they may have caused in the child, without abandoning the old categories, linked to the biological. No doubt the novelties are to be found more in what we intend to entrust the medical and educational notebook to the children, but this parenthesis will soon be closed and finally fade away in the face of criticism of what is then considered to be social control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于儿童的医学心理教育著作:二十世纪的个人小册子项目
本文重点介绍了儿童个体医学教学笔记本的项目及其发展。在二十世纪,人们曾多次尝试引入一种健康记录,这种记录也将考虑心理和教学数据。它们最初旨在学校卫生,但也被部署在预防领域,以检测“异常”儿童,后来又被部署在职业指导领域。第二次世界大战也产生了一种不同的方法,即合理化儿童的健康和心理写作,寻求考虑到这些事件及其可能在儿童身上造成的影响,而不放弃与生物学相关的旧类别。毫无疑问,这些新奇之处更多地体现在我们打算将医疗和教育笔记本托付给孩子们的东西上,但这一括号很快就会被关闭,并最终在当时被认为是社会控制的批评面前消失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Society
Politics & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.
期刊最新文献
Bringing Household Finance Back In: House Prices and the Missing Macroeconomics of Comparative Political Economy Who Pays for Environmental Policy? Business Power and the Design of State-Level Climate Policies* Supervising Local Cadres in China: The Quest for Authoritarian Accountability Rethinking Antitrust for the Cloud Era Antitrust and Equal Liberty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1