Rethinking recruitment ethically through the lens of corporate social responsibility (CSR)

IF 1.6 Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1108/ebhrm-05-2022-0113
Vic Benuyenah
{"title":"Rethinking recruitment ethically through the lens of corporate social responsibility (CSR)","authors":"Vic Benuyenah","doi":"10.1108/ebhrm-05-2022-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTraditional recruitment practices tend to be rigorous, but some of its elements can be improved. The length of applications, missing or unstated salary details and lack of anonymity in some emerging countries' recruitment processes mean that recruitment standards remain questionable and unethical. This paper presents a conceptual discourse on how current recruitment activities can be improved in light of progress made with global Internet infrastructure and CSR standards.Design/methodology/approachThis is primarily a conceptual paper intended to discuss unethical recruitment practices. The author used selected studies and case studies to present the case for improvements in the field of recruitment.FindingsCompared with easy apply options popularised through recruitment websites, organisations continue to favour traditionally lengthy and complicated applications. The incidence of unstated salary, lack of anonymity and poor communication from some recruiters imply that more has to be done in these areas of CSR.Research limitations/implicationsAs with most conceptual papers, this study lacks adequate empirical support. The claims and propositions made are largely based on a scanty number of current research and industry observations.Practical implicationsThis study will have potential application in scenarios where recruiters are seeking to improve their practice; however, the recommendations may not be applicable to all organisations.Social implicationsThe understanding of ethical values and their application to recruitment will vary from culture to culture.Originality/valueThe paper offers a clear path to debating recruitment ethics and improvements in current practices. No known studies have specifically targeted this area of ethical recruitment.","PeriodicalId":51902,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-05-2022-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTraditional recruitment practices tend to be rigorous, but some of its elements can be improved. The length of applications, missing or unstated salary details and lack of anonymity in some emerging countries' recruitment processes mean that recruitment standards remain questionable and unethical. This paper presents a conceptual discourse on how current recruitment activities can be improved in light of progress made with global Internet infrastructure and CSR standards.Design/methodology/approachThis is primarily a conceptual paper intended to discuss unethical recruitment practices. The author used selected studies and case studies to present the case for improvements in the field of recruitment.FindingsCompared with easy apply options popularised through recruitment websites, organisations continue to favour traditionally lengthy and complicated applications. The incidence of unstated salary, lack of anonymity and poor communication from some recruiters imply that more has to be done in these areas of CSR.Research limitations/implicationsAs with most conceptual papers, this study lacks adequate empirical support. The claims and propositions made are largely based on a scanty number of current research and industry observations.Practical implicationsThis study will have potential application in scenarios where recruiters are seeking to improve their practice; however, the recommendations may not be applicable to all organisations.Social implicationsThe understanding of ethical values and their application to recruitment will vary from culture to culture.Originality/valueThe paper offers a clear path to debating recruitment ethics and improvements in current practices. No known studies have specifically targeted this area of ethical recruitment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从企业社会责任的角度重新思考招聘的道德问题
目的传统的招聘做法往往是严格的,但其中一些要素可以改进。一些新兴国家的招聘过程中,申请时间长、工资细节缺失或未说明,以及缺乏匿名性,这意味着招聘标准仍然值得怀疑和不道德。本文从概念上阐述了如何根据全球互联网基础设施和企业社会责任标准的进展来改进当前的招聘活动。设计/方法论/方法这主要是一篇概念性论文,旨在讨论不道德的招聘行为。作者利用选定的研究和案例研究提出了改进征聘领域的理由。发现与通过招聘网站普及的简单申请选项相比,组织仍然青睐传统上冗长而复杂的申请。一些招聘人员未说明工资、缺乏匿名性和沟通不畅的情况表明,在企业社会责任的这些领域还需要做更多的工作。研究局限性/含义与大多数概念论文一样,本研究缺乏足够的实证支持。所提出的主张和主张主要基于少量的当前研究和行业观察。实际含义这项研究将在招聘人员寻求改进其实践的场景中具有潜在的应用价值;然而,这些建议可能并不适用于所有组织。社会含义对道德价值观的理解及其在招聘中的应用因文化而异。原创性/价值该论文为讨论招聘道德和当前做法的改进提供了一条清晰的途径。没有已知的研究专门针对这一道德招聘领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Do employees involved in career accidents experience greater work engagement? The moderating role of job resources Healthy employees are assets: a structural model based on individual and organizational characteristics for hotel employee well-being The moderating effects of positive thinking on the relationship between job stress and turnover intention Extending training predictors link with training transfer through mediation of motivation Impacts of knowledge-based HRM, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational supports on innovation performance: a moderated-mediation analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1