Association of Pediatric Patient Demographic Factors and Scar Anatomic Features With Scar Outcomes After Surgical Repair of Cleft Lip.

A. Marston, M. S. Costello, Z. Farhood, K. A. Brandstetter, Alexander W. Murphey, S. Nguyen, C. Discolo, K. Patel
{"title":"Association of Pediatric Patient Demographic Factors and Scar Anatomic Features With Scar Outcomes After Surgical Repair of Cleft Lip.","authors":"A. Marston, M. S. Costello, Z. Farhood, K. A. Brandstetter, Alexander W. Murphey, S. Nguyen, C. Discolo, K. Patel","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nScar outcomes following cleft lip repair are an important component of pediatric patient and family satisfaction and indicate the need for future surgical interventions.\n\n\nObjective\nTo assess the association of pediatric patient demographic factors and scar anatomic features with scar outcomes following cleft lip surgical repair.\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\nA case-control study was conducted involving 58 pediatric patients who underwent surgical repair of a cleft lip from October 31, 2008, to August 4, 2016, at a tertiary care pediatric specialty hospital. Data on patient demographic factors, cleft type, and the surgical technique used were collected and analyzed from June 11, 2009, to November 21, 2017. Scar outcomes were subjectively rated by 3 physicians at 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals.\n\n\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nOverall scar outcomes at 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals were based on rating of scar appearance, color, width, height, and alignment by using a subjective, 5-point scar-assessment scale in which 1 indicated the poorest aesthetic appearance and 5, the ideal aesthetic appearance.\n\n\nResults\nA total of 58 pediatric patients who underwent cleft lip repair were evaluated; mean (SD) age at time of repair, 4.8 (3.0) months. Of these, 44 (76%) were male and 14 (24%) were female, 37 (64%) were white, 11 (19%) were black, 7 (12%) were Hispanic, 2 (3%) were Asian, and 1 (2%) was of another race/ethnicity. Scores on the Cohen κ interrater test indicated either a substantial or almost perfect strength of agreement among the physicians grading the scar outcomes. At 12 months, patients with black skin type had worse overall scar outcomes than patients with white skin type (odds ratio [OR], -0.31; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.14; P = .03). A depressed scar height (OR, -0.54; 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.49; P < .001), and hypopigmented scar color (OR, -0.45; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.32; P = .002) were associated with worse scar outcomes at 12 months following surgery. The overall median lip scar outcome significantly improved between the 6-month and 12-month follow-up assessments (scar-assessment scale score, 3.3; interquartile range [IQR], 2.7-4.0 vs 4.0; IQR, 3.3-4.3; P < .001). No association was observed between the anatomic type and severity of the cleft lip and scar outcomes (unilateral vs bilateral cleft, complete vs incomplete or microform cleft, and lip height ratio of the unilateral noncleft to cleft lip).\n\n\nConclusions and Relevance\nThis study's findings suggest that, compared with white pediatric patients, black pediatric patients exhibited worse overall scar outcomes. A depressed scar and a hypopigmented scar also were associated with overall worse scar appearance after surgical repair. Cleft lip scar outcomes were not significantly associated with the type and severity of the cleft lip.","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0669","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Importance Scar outcomes following cleft lip repair are an important component of pediatric patient and family satisfaction and indicate the need for future surgical interventions. Objective To assess the association of pediatric patient demographic factors and scar anatomic features with scar outcomes following cleft lip surgical repair. Design, Setting, and Participants A case-control study was conducted involving 58 pediatric patients who underwent surgical repair of a cleft lip from October 31, 2008, to August 4, 2016, at a tertiary care pediatric specialty hospital. Data on patient demographic factors, cleft type, and the surgical technique used were collected and analyzed from June 11, 2009, to November 21, 2017. Scar outcomes were subjectively rated by 3 physicians at 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall scar outcomes at 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals were based on rating of scar appearance, color, width, height, and alignment by using a subjective, 5-point scar-assessment scale in which 1 indicated the poorest aesthetic appearance and 5, the ideal aesthetic appearance. Results A total of 58 pediatric patients who underwent cleft lip repair were evaluated; mean (SD) age at time of repair, 4.8 (3.0) months. Of these, 44 (76%) were male and 14 (24%) were female, 37 (64%) were white, 11 (19%) were black, 7 (12%) were Hispanic, 2 (3%) were Asian, and 1 (2%) was of another race/ethnicity. Scores on the Cohen κ interrater test indicated either a substantial or almost perfect strength of agreement among the physicians grading the scar outcomes. At 12 months, patients with black skin type had worse overall scar outcomes than patients with white skin type (odds ratio [OR], -0.31; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.14; P = .03). A depressed scar height (OR, -0.54; 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.49; P < .001), and hypopigmented scar color (OR, -0.45; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.32; P = .002) were associated with worse scar outcomes at 12 months following surgery. The overall median lip scar outcome significantly improved between the 6-month and 12-month follow-up assessments (scar-assessment scale score, 3.3; interquartile range [IQR], 2.7-4.0 vs 4.0; IQR, 3.3-4.3; P < .001). No association was observed between the anatomic type and severity of the cleft lip and scar outcomes (unilateral vs bilateral cleft, complete vs incomplete or microform cleft, and lip height ratio of the unilateral noncleft to cleft lip). Conclusions and Relevance This study's findings suggest that, compared with white pediatric patients, black pediatric patients exhibited worse overall scar outcomes. A depressed scar and a hypopigmented scar also were associated with overall worse scar appearance after surgical repair. Cleft lip scar outcomes were not significantly associated with the type and severity of the cleft lip.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童患者人口学因素和疤痕解剖特征与唇腭裂手术后疤痕结果的关系。
重要性唇裂修复后的疤痕结果是儿童患者和家庭满意度的重要组成部分,并表明未来需要手术干预。目的评估儿童患者人口学因素和瘢痕解剖特征与唇裂手术后瘢痕结果的关系。设计、设置和参与者一项病例对照研究涉及2008年10月31日至2016年8月4日在一家三级护理儿科专科医院接受唇裂手术修复的58名儿童患者。从2009年6月11日至2017年11月21日,收集并分析了患者人口统计学因素、腭裂类型和所用手术技术的数据。3名医生在术后6个月和12个月对瘢痕结果进行主观评分。主要结果和测量方法术后6个月和12个月的总体疤痕结果基于疤痕外观、颜色、宽度、高度和排列的评分,使用主观的5分疤痕评估量表,其中1分表示最差的美学外观,5分表示理想的美学外观。结果对58例接受唇裂修复术的患儿进行了评价;修复时的平均(SD)年龄为4.8(3.0)个月。其中,44人(76%)为男性,14人(24%)为女性,37人(64%)为白人,11人(19%)为黑人,7人(12%)为西班牙裔,2人(3%)为亚裔,1人(2%)为其他种族/族裔。Cohenκinterrater测试的分数表明,对疤痕结果进行评分的医生之间存在实质性或几乎完美的一致性。在12个月时,黑皮肤型患者的总体疤痕结果比白皮肤型患者差(比值比[OR],-0.31;95%CI,-1.15至-0.14;P = .03)。瘢痕高度降低(OR,-0.54;95%CI,-1.32至-0.49;P < .001)和色素沉着的瘢痕颜色(OR,-0.45;95%CI,-1.34至-0.32;P = .002)与手术后12个月更差的瘢痕结果相关。在6个月和12个月的随访评估中,唇瘢痕的总体中位结果显著改善(瘢痕评估量表评分,3.3;四分位间距[IQR],2.7-4.0 vs 4.0;IQR,3.3-4.3;P < .001)。唇裂的解剖类型和严重程度与疤痕结果(单侧与双侧唇裂、完全性与不完全性或微小型唇裂以及单侧非唇裂与唇裂的唇高比)之间没有相关性。结论和相关性本研究的发现表明,与白人儿童患者相比,黑人儿科患者的总体疤痕结果较差。凹陷的疤痕和色素沉着的疤痕也与手术修复后整体疤痕外观更差有关。唇裂疤痕的结果与唇裂的类型和严重程度没有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1