Mercy N. Ndalila, Grant J. Williamson, David M. J. S. Bowman
{"title":"Carbon dioxide and particulate emissions from the 2013 Tasmanian firestorm: implications for Australian carbon accounting","authors":"Mercy N. Ndalila, Grant J. Williamson, David M. J. S. Bowman","doi":"10.1186/s13021-022-00207-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Uncontrolled wildfires in Australian temperate <i>Eucalyptus</i> forests produce significant smoke emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and particulates. Emissions from fires in these ecosystems, however, have received less research attention than the fires in North American conifer forests or frequently burned Australian tropical savannas. Here, we use the 2013 Forcett–Dunalley fire that caused the first recorded pyrocumulonimbus event in Tasmania, to understand CO<sub>2</sub> and particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) emissions from a severe <i>Eucalyptus</i> forest fire. We investigate the spatial patterns of the two emissions using a fine scale mapping of vegetation and fire severity (50 m resolution), and utilising available emission factors suitable for Australian vegetation types. We compare the results with coarse-scale (28 km resolution) emissions estimates from Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) to determine the reliability of the global model in emissions estimation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The fine scale inventory yielded total CO<sub>2</sub> emission of 1.125 ± 0.232 Tg and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission of 0.022 ± 0.006 Tg, representing a loss of 56 t CO<sub>2</sub> ha<sup>−1</sup> and 1 t PM<sub>2.5</sub> ha<sup>−1</sup>. The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were comparable to GFED estimates, but GFED PM<sub>2.5</sub> estimates were lower by a factor of three. This study highlights the reliability of GFED for CO<sub>2</sub> but not PM<sub>2.5</sub> for estimating emissions from <i>Eucalyptus</i> forest fires. Our fine scale and GFED estimates showed that the Forcett–Dunalley fire produced 30% of 2013 fire carbon emissions in Tasmania, and 26–36% of mean annual fire emissions for the State, representing a significant single source of emissions.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our analyses highlight the need for improved PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission factors specific to Australian vegetation, and better characterisation of fuel loads, particularly coarse fuel loads, to quantify wildfire particulate and greenhouse gas emissions more accurately. Current Australian carbon accountancy approach of excluding large wildfires from final GHG accounts likely exaggerates Tasmania’s claim to carbon neutrality; we therefore recommend that planned and unplanned emissions are included in the final national and state greenhouse gas accounting to international conventions. Advancing these issues is important given the trajectory of more frequent large fires driven by anthropogenic climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-022-00207-9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-022-00207-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background
Uncontrolled wildfires in Australian temperate Eucalyptus forests produce significant smoke emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) and particulates. Emissions from fires in these ecosystems, however, have received less research attention than the fires in North American conifer forests or frequently burned Australian tropical savannas. Here, we use the 2013 Forcett–Dunalley fire that caused the first recorded pyrocumulonimbus event in Tasmania, to understand CO2 and particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions from a severe Eucalyptus forest fire. We investigate the spatial patterns of the two emissions using a fine scale mapping of vegetation and fire severity (50 m resolution), and utilising available emission factors suitable for Australian vegetation types. We compare the results with coarse-scale (28 km resolution) emissions estimates from Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) to determine the reliability of the global model in emissions estimation.
Results
The fine scale inventory yielded total CO2 emission of 1.125 ± 0.232 Tg and PM2.5 emission of 0.022 ± 0.006 Tg, representing a loss of 56 t CO2 ha−1 and 1 t PM2.5 ha−1. The CO2 emissions were comparable to GFED estimates, but GFED PM2.5 estimates were lower by a factor of three. This study highlights the reliability of GFED for CO2 but not PM2.5 for estimating emissions from Eucalyptus forest fires. Our fine scale and GFED estimates showed that the Forcett–Dunalley fire produced 30% of 2013 fire carbon emissions in Tasmania, and 26–36% of mean annual fire emissions for the State, representing a significant single source of emissions.
Conclusions
Our analyses highlight the need for improved PM2.5 emission factors specific to Australian vegetation, and better characterisation of fuel loads, particularly coarse fuel loads, to quantify wildfire particulate and greenhouse gas emissions more accurately. Current Australian carbon accountancy approach of excluding large wildfires from final GHG accounts likely exaggerates Tasmania’s claim to carbon neutrality; we therefore recommend that planned and unplanned emissions are included in the final national and state greenhouse gas accounting to international conventions. Advancing these issues is important given the trajectory of more frequent large fires driven by anthropogenic climate change.
背景在澳大利亚温带桉树林中,不受控制的野火产生了大量的烟雾排放,特别是二氧化碳和颗粒物。然而,与北美针叶林或经常燃烧的澳大利亚热带稀树草原的火灾相比,这些生态系统中火灾产生的排放物受到的研究关注较少。在这里,我们使用了2013年的force - dunalley火灾,该火灾导致了塔斯马尼亚州第一次有记录的火积雨云事件,以了解严重桉树森林火灾产生的二氧化碳和颗粒物(PM2.5)排放。我们利用植被和火灾严重程度(50米分辨率)的精细比例尺制图,并利用适合澳大利亚植被类型的可用排放因子,研究了这两种排放的空间格局。我们将结果与全球火灾排放数据库(GFED)的粗尺度(28公里分辨率)排放估计值进行比较,以确定全球模型在排放估算中的可靠性。结果细尺度清查产生的CO2总排放量为1.125±0.232 Tg, PM2.5总排放量为0.022±0.006 Tg,分别损失了56 t CO2 ha - 1和1 t PM2.5 ha - 1。二氧化碳排放量与GFED的估计相当,但GFED对PM2.5的估计要低三分之一。这项研究强调了GFED在估计桉树森林火灾排放时对二氧化碳而不是PM2.5的可靠性。我们的精细尺度和GFED估算显示,福斯特-杜纳利火灾产生的碳排放量占塔斯马尼亚州2013年火灾碳排放量的30%,占该州平均年火灾排放量的26-36%,是一个重要的单一排放源。sour分析强调需要改善澳大利亚植被的PM2.5排放因子,并更好地表征燃料负荷,特别是粗燃料负荷,以更准确地量化野火颗粒和温室气体排放。目前澳大利亚的碳核算方法将大型野火排除在最终的温室气体核算之外,这可能夸大了塔斯马尼亚州对碳中和的主张;因此,我们建议将计划内和计划外的排放纳入国际公约的最终国家和州温室气体核算中。考虑到由人为气候变化引起的更频繁的大火的轨迹,推进这些问题是重要的。
期刊介绍:
Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle.
The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community.
This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system.
Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.