Remote Gait Analysis as a Proxy for Traditional Gait Laboratories: Utilizing Smartphones for Subject-Driven Gait Assessment across Differing Terrains

Arjan Kahlon, Ashwini Sansare, A. Behboodi
{"title":"Remote Gait Analysis as a Proxy for Traditional Gait Laboratories: Utilizing Smartphones for Subject-Driven Gait Assessment across Differing Terrains","authors":"Arjan Kahlon, Ashwini Sansare, A. Behboodi","doi":"10.3390/biomechanics2020019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gait analysis has applications in medical diagnosis, biometrics, and development of therapeutic rehabilitation interventions (such as orthotics, prosthetics, and exoskeletons). While offering accurate measurements, gait laboratories are expensive, not scalable, and not easily accessible. In a pandemic-afflicted world, where telemedicine is crucial, there is need for subject-driven data remote collection. This study proposed a remote and purely subject-driven procedure for reproducible and scalable collection of real-life gait data. To evaluate the feasibility of our proposed procedure, the spatiotemporal parameters of gait were compared across two real-life terrains using a smartphone application on a focus population of healthy middle-aged individuals. Previous research validated smartphone motion sensors as accurate instruments for gait analysis, but required highly supervised, controlled environments on smaller sample sizes, thereby limiting application in real-life gait analysis. To this end, a custom-designed mobile application was developed to record lower extremity angular velocities on 69 healthy middle-aged adults; factoring in a subject-driven data submission error rate (DSER) of 17.4%, there were 57 usable data sets for analysis. Comparisons of spatiotemporal gait parameters across primary outcome measures on grass versus asphalt revealed significant measurable increases in gait duration (stride time), valley depth (max swing phase), and peak-to-valley (max stance phase to max swing phase). These results demonstrated the feasibility of using smartphones for a remote and fully subject-driven gait data collection. Additionally, our data analysis showed that even in short trials, a physical environmental load has a substantial and measurable effect on the gait of the understudied middle-aged population.","PeriodicalId":72381,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics2020019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Gait analysis has applications in medical diagnosis, biometrics, and development of therapeutic rehabilitation interventions (such as orthotics, prosthetics, and exoskeletons). While offering accurate measurements, gait laboratories are expensive, not scalable, and not easily accessible. In a pandemic-afflicted world, where telemedicine is crucial, there is need for subject-driven data remote collection. This study proposed a remote and purely subject-driven procedure for reproducible and scalable collection of real-life gait data. To evaluate the feasibility of our proposed procedure, the spatiotemporal parameters of gait were compared across two real-life terrains using a smartphone application on a focus population of healthy middle-aged individuals. Previous research validated smartphone motion sensors as accurate instruments for gait analysis, but required highly supervised, controlled environments on smaller sample sizes, thereby limiting application in real-life gait analysis. To this end, a custom-designed mobile application was developed to record lower extremity angular velocities on 69 healthy middle-aged adults; factoring in a subject-driven data submission error rate (DSER) of 17.4%, there were 57 usable data sets for analysis. Comparisons of spatiotemporal gait parameters across primary outcome measures on grass versus asphalt revealed significant measurable increases in gait duration (stride time), valley depth (max swing phase), and peak-to-valley (max stance phase to max swing phase). These results demonstrated the feasibility of using smartphones for a remote and fully subject-driven gait data collection. Additionally, our data analysis showed that even in short trials, a physical environmental load has a substantial and measurable effect on the gait of the understudied middle-aged population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程步态分析作为传统步态实验室的代理:利用智能手机进行不同地形的受试者驱动步态评估
步态分析在医学诊断、生物识别和治疗性康复干预措施(如矫形器、假肢和外骨骼)的开发中有应用。步态实验室虽然提供精确的测量,但价格昂贵,不可扩展,也不容易访问。在一个疫情肆虐的世界里,远程医疗至关重要,需要受试者驱动的数据远程收集。这项研究提出了一种远程和纯受试者驱动的程序,用于可重复和可扩展的真实步态数据收集。为了评估我们提出的程序的可行性,使用智能手机应用程序在健康中年人的重点人群中比较了两个真实地形中步态的时空参数。先前的研究验证了智能手机运动传感器是步态分析的精确仪器,但需要高度监督和控制的环境,样本量较小,从而限制了其在现实步态分析中的应用。为此,开发了一款定制的移动应用程序,用于记录69名健康中年人的下肢角速度;考虑到17.4%的受试者驱动的数据提交错误率(DSER),有57个可用的数据集可供分析。草地和沥青上主要结果测量的时空步态参数的比较显示,步态持续时间(步幅时间)、谷深(最大摆动阶段)和峰谷(最大站立阶段到最大摆动相位)显著增加。这些结果证明了使用智能手机进行远程和完全受试者驱动的步态数据收集的可行性。此外,我们的数据分析表明,即使在短期试验中,物理环境负荷也会对研究不足的中年人群的步态产生实质性和可衡量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Aging on Patellofemoral Joint Stress during Stair Negotiation on Challenging Surfaces. Definition of a Global Coordinate System in the Foot for the Surgical Planning of Forefoot Corrections Postural Control Behavior in a Virtual Moving Room Paradigm Patient-Specific 3D Virtual Surgical Planning Using Simulated Fluoroscopic Images to Improve Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Optimization of a Cost-Constrained, Hydraulic Knee Prosthesis Using a Kinematic Analysis Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1