Autonomía de las confesiones y profesores de religión: El caso ‘Fernández Martínez c/ España’

Q4 Social Sciences Prudentia Iuris Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.46553/PRUDENTIA.91.2021.PP.225-238
Gonzalo Castellanos
{"title":"Autonomía de las confesiones y profesores de religión: El caso ‘Fernández Martínez c/ España’","authors":"Gonzalo Castellanos","doi":"10.46553/PRUDENTIA.91.2021.PP.225-238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This is the case of a professor of religion and Catholic morality at a public educational center in Murcia (Spain), whose certificate of suitability was not renewed by the Bishopric, which authorizes him to practice as a religion teacher, due to the fact that has publicly maintained a conduct and opinions in open contrast with the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. It raises the autonomy of the Catholic Church to judge the suitability of the religion teacher, the right not to propose teachers who have lost this quality and the standards of interpretation that arise from the European Court of Human Rights in order to a legitimate jurisdictional control.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/PRUDENTIA.91.2021.PP.225-238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This is the case of a professor of religion and Catholic morality at a public educational center in Murcia (Spain), whose certificate of suitability was not renewed by the Bishopric, which authorizes him to practice as a religion teacher, due to the fact that has publicly maintained a conduct and opinions in open contrast with the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. It raises the autonomy of the Catholic Church to judge the suitability of the religion teacher, the right not to propose teachers who have lost this quality and the standards of interpretation that arise from the European Court of Human Rights in order to a legitimate jurisdictional control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教信仰和教师的自治:“fernandez martinez诉西班牙”案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La familia como fundamento del Estado Constitucional. Una investigación pretendidamente radical Comisión por omisión y causalidad La jurisprudencia en una economía con tipo de cambio múltiple. El caso de Argentina 2020-2023. ¿Francisco de Vitoria ideólogo del imperialismo? Revisión crítica de algunas interpretaciones recientes. La vigencia del derecho natural en el derecho positivo de todas las comunidades
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1