Re-Examining the Genetic Bottleneck: Atavistic Regression in Acquired Traits Affects the Outcome for Many Subspecies at the Allelic Level

Yosemite Sam
{"title":"Re-Examining the Genetic Bottleneck: Atavistic Regression in Acquired Traits Affects the Outcome for Many Subspecies at the Allelic Level","authors":"Yosemite Sam","doi":"10.19080/IJCSMB.2019.05.555674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genetic “bottlenecks” have long been understood to restrict the ability of a species to pass on its genetic traits to later generations. Such events occur when the numbers of one species are too small to pass on a full range of genes. Inevitably, an impoverished genome results, one that is prone to disease or to inbreeding. Now, however, a second effect of these bottlenecks is shown. Replication is the benthic standard for assessing genetic bottlenecks from wide stochastic studies. Unfortunately, this replication requirement may cause real genetic effects to be missed. A real result can fail to replicate for strategic reasons including benthic size or variability in strategic definitions across complex samples. In genome-wide strategic studies the genetic allowances of polymorphisms may differ due to sampling error or population RNA. We hypothesize that some statistically significant benthic genetic effects may fail to replicate in a complex informational set when strategic frequencies differ, and the functional polymorphism seems with one or more other diametric polymorphisms. To test this theory, we designed a simple study in which stochastic status grew by two interacting bottlenecks with data-irritability from 0.044 to 0.8 with dilatory sample sizes ranging from 400 to 1,700 individuals. We show that the need to replicate the united complex main effect of two polymorphisms can drop a little with a change of strategic distance of less than 0.1 at a semi-interacting polymorphism. We also show that differences in useful size can result in a reversal of meretricious effects where a benthic gene becomes a strategic factor in dilatory studies. Those stochastic data suggest that failure to replicate a complex bottleneck may provide strategic clues about the complexity of the underlying genetic sense. We think that morphisms that fail to replicate be checked for dilatory quirks with strategic units, particularly when taken from people with stochastic backgrounds or different geological regions.","PeriodicalId":93190,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cell science & molecular biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cell science & molecular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/IJCSMB.2019.05.555674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic “bottlenecks” have long been understood to restrict the ability of a species to pass on its genetic traits to later generations. Such events occur when the numbers of one species are too small to pass on a full range of genes. Inevitably, an impoverished genome results, one that is prone to disease or to inbreeding. Now, however, a second effect of these bottlenecks is shown. Replication is the benthic standard for assessing genetic bottlenecks from wide stochastic studies. Unfortunately, this replication requirement may cause real genetic effects to be missed. A real result can fail to replicate for strategic reasons including benthic size or variability in strategic definitions across complex samples. In genome-wide strategic studies the genetic allowances of polymorphisms may differ due to sampling error or population RNA. We hypothesize that some statistically significant benthic genetic effects may fail to replicate in a complex informational set when strategic frequencies differ, and the functional polymorphism seems with one or more other diametric polymorphisms. To test this theory, we designed a simple study in which stochastic status grew by two interacting bottlenecks with data-irritability from 0.044 to 0.8 with dilatory sample sizes ranging from 400 to 1,700 individuals. We show that the need to replicate the united complex main effect of two polymorphisms can drop a little with a change of strategic distance of less than 0.1 at a semi-interacting polymorphism. We also show that differences in useful size can result in a reversal of meretricious effects where a benthic gene becomes a strategic factor in dilatory studies. Those stochastic data suggest that failure to replicate a complex bottleneck may provide strategic clues about the complexity of the underlying genetic sense. We think that morphisms that fail to replicate be checked for dilatory quirks with strategic units, particularly when taken from people with stochastic backgrounds or different geological regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视遗传瓶颈:获得性性状的返祖回归在等位基因水平上影响许多亚种的结果
长期以来,人们一直认为基因“瓶颈”限制了一个物种将其遗传特征传给后代的能力。当一个物种的数量太少而无法传递全部基因时,就会发生这种事件。不可避免地,会产生一个贫穷的基因组,一个容易生病或近亲繁殖的基因组。然而,现在,这些瓶颈的第二个影响已经显现出来。复制是从广泛的随机研究中评估遗传瓶颈的海底标准。不幸的是,这种复制要求可能会导致错过真正的遗传效应。由于战略原因,包括海底规模或复杂样本战略定义的可变性,真实的结果可能无法复制。在全基因组战略研究中,多态性的遗传容许量可能因采样错误或群体RNA而不同。我们假设,当策略频率不同时,一些具有统计学意义的海底遗传效应可能无法在复杂的信息集中复制,并且功能多态性似乎与一个或多个其他直径多态性有关。为了验证这一理论,我们设计了一项简单的研究,其中随机状态由两个相互作用的瓶颈增长,数据易激性从0.044到0.8,扩展样本量从400到1700人不等。我们表明,在半相互作用的多态性下,复制两个多态性的联合复合体主要效应的需要可能会略有下降,策略距离的变化小于0.1。我们还表明,有用大小的差异可以逆转个体自残效应,在拖延研究中,底栖基因成为一个战略因素。这些随机数据表明,未能复制复杂的瓶颈可能会为潜在遗传意义的复杂性提供战略线索。我们认为,无法复制的形态可以用战略单位来检查是否有拖沓的怪癖,特别是当从具有随机背景或不同地质区域的人身上提取时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Covid-19: A Retrospective Study Elucidation of Anticancerous Potential of Plant Extracts Against Cervical Cancer Markers for the Characterization of Liver Mesenchymal Stem Cell Clarion and Crystal-Clear Cell Hidradenoma Re-Examining the Genetic Bottleneck: Atavistic Regression in Acquired Traits Affects the Outcome for Many Subspecies at the Allelic Level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1